Who Needs Imagined Contact?
Replication Attempts Examining Previous Contact as a Potential Moderator
Abstract
Abstract. Imagined contact is a widely-used methodology for decreasing prejudice. Recently, however, the effectiveness and replicability of imagined contact have been debated. To the extent that imagined contact is theoretically a valuable intervention when actual contact is absent or less feasible, previous intergroup contact experiences presumably moderate the efficacy of imagined contact. The present investigation found that imagined contact effects were stronger among heterosexuals with infrequent (vs. frequent) previous contact with gays, improving their intergroup emotions and attitudes (Study 1, N = 261). In contrast, there were no such effects of imagined contact with Muslims among non-Muslims (Study 2, N = 320). These findings highlight the potential for moderators to impact the efficacy of experimental contact simulations. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
References
1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2013). Unwilling, but not unaffected – Imagined contact effects for authoritarians and social dominators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 404–412.
(1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19–39.
(2011). Support for gay and lesbian civil rights: Development and examination of a new scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 58, 462–475.
(2014). Reducing prejudice through mental imagery: Notes on replication, interpretation, and generalization. Psychological Science, 25, 840–841.
(2014). Support for the replicability of imagined contact effects. Social Psychology, 45, 303–304.
(2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. The American Psychologist, 64, 231–240.
(2012). The imagined contact hypothesis. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 126–182.
(2013).
(Imagined intergroup contact: Refinement, debates, and clarification . In G. HodsonM. HewstoneEds., Advances in intergroup contact. London, UK: Psychology Press.2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172–177.
(2013). Special thematic section on “societal change”: ‘What’s so funny “bout peace, love and understanding?” Further reflections on the limits of prejudice reduction as a model of social change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 239–252.
(2012). Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS One, 7, e29081.
(2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
(1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477.
(2008). Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 325–351.
(2011). Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 154–159.
(2009). Experiencing alien-nation: Effects of a simulation intervention on attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 974–978.
(2013).
(Is intergroup contact beneficial among intolerant people? Exploring individual differences in the benefits of contact on attitudes . In G. HodsonM. HewstoneEds., Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 49–80). London, UK: Psychology Press.2015). Can (elaborated) imagined contact interventions reduce prejudice among those higher in intergroup disgust sensitivity (ITG-DS)? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 123–131.
(2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509–525.
(Hodson G.Hewstone M. (Eds.). (2013). Advances in intergroup contact. London, UK: Psychology Press.
2015). Development and validation of the attitudes toward asexuals (ATA) scale. Psychology & Sexuality. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/19419899.2015.1050446
(2010). Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 943–950.
(2012). Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 645–654.
(2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “Many Labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152.
(2009). The Islamophobia Scale: Instrument development and initial validation. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 92–105.
(2014). Treating prejudice with imagery: Easier said than done? Psychological Science, 25, 837–839.
(2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 3–26.
(2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188.
(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
(2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934.
(2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.
(1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175.
(2010). Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 129–142.
(2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 427–441.
(2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 93, 369–388.
(2013). Out-group trust, intergroup anxiety, and out-group attitude as mediators of the effect of imagined intergroup contact on intergroup behavioral tendencies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E196–E205.
(2015). Imagined contact works in high-prejudice contexts: Investigating imagined contact’s effects on anti-gay prejudice in Cyprus and Jamaica. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12, 60–69.
(