Gender Role Orientation Moderates Effects of Stereotype Activation on Test Performances
Abstract
Abstract. We investigated the moderation of effects of activated gender stereotypes on the performance of women in tests of different ability domains. The Bem Sex Role Inventory assessed masculinity and femininity. The difference of the masculinity and femininity scores served as a continuous independent variable of gender role orientation. Only participants with feminine gender role orientation suffered from stereotype activation with regard to mental rotation and math performance. In contrast, participants with feminine gender role orientation profited from stereotype activation with regard to emotional sensitivity performance. These results demonstrate a generally higher susceptibility to gender stereotypes of women with feminine gender role orientation. Higher self-relevance of stereotypes was associated with stronger stereotype threat, but also stronger stereotype lift or boost.
References
2004). Deflecting negative self-relevant stereotype activation: The effects of individuation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 401–408. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.08.003
(1999). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000: IST 2000
([Intelligence Structure Test 2000] . Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.1999). When white men can’t do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29–46. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1371
(1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
(2006). Disabling the able: Stereotype threat and women’s work performance. Human Performance, 19, 133–158. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1902_3
(1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Old questions, new answers. Sex Roles, 30, 423–457. doi: 10.1007/BF01420602
(2009). The role of performance-avoidance goals and worry in mediating the relationship between stereotype threat and performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.005
(2003). Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 626–633. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00039-8
(2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Psychological Science, 16, 572–578. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01577.x
(2009). Stereotype endorsement and perceived ability as mediators of the girls’ gender orientation-soccer performance relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 297–299. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.08.002
(2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307–1310. doi: 10.1126/science.1128317
(2009). Dynamics of social comparison in counter-stereotypic domains: Stereotype boost, not stereotype threat, for women engineering majors. Social Influence, 4, 171–184. doi: 10.1080/15534510802607953
(2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628. doi: 10.1177/014616702237644
(2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1–40.
(2012). Speed of emotional information processing and emotional intelligence. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 429–437. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.656131
(1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotion from facial cues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
(1997). Sex differences in intelligence. The American Psychologist, 52, 1091–1102. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1091
(2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00234
(2007). PXLab: The Psychological Experiments Laboratory [online]. Version 2.1.11. Mannheim, Germany: University of Mannheim. Retrieved from http://www.pxlab.de
(1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
(1985). Sex role development as a function of parent models and oedipal fixation. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 146, 89–99. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1985.9923451
(1990). Gender differences in personality: Biological and/or psychological? European Journal of Personality, 4, 303–317. doi: 10.1002/per.2410040404
(2006). Combating stereotype threat: The effect of self-affirmation on women’s intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 236–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.010
(2005). Individual differences in gender role belief influence spatial ability test performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 99–111. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2004.11.002
(2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 486–493. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2006.06.003
(2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1314–1334. doi: 10.1037/a0012702
(2008). Where are the gender differences? Male priming boosts spatial skills in women. Sex Roles, 59, 274–281. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9448-9
(2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194–201. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2001.1500
(2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440
(2004). The cost of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50, 835–850. doi: 10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0
(2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336
(1988). Die Erfassung von Geschlechtsrollen – Ergebnisse zur deutschen Neukonstruktion des Bem Sex Role Inventory
([Assessment of gender roles: Results for the new German version of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory] . Diagnostica, 34, 256–270.2004). Stereotype threat and performance: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 38.
(1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701
(2002). Stereotype performance boosts: The impact of self-relevance and the manner of stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 638–647. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.638
(2012).
(Stereotype boost . In M. InzlichtT. SchmaderEds., Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 141–156). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
(1999). Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1213–1227. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1213
(2014). Stereotype threat, test anxiety, and mathematics performance. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 491–501. doi: 10.1007/s11218-014-9263-9
(1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualizations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 456–467. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
(2011). Digit ratio (2D:4D) and sex-role orientation: Further evidence and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 417–422. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.009
(2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00019-2
(1995). Effects of sex and sex role attributions on the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Neuropsychology, 9, 62–67. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.9.1.62
(