Skip to main content
Research Report

Overfulfilling the Norm

The Better-Than-Average Effect in Judgments of Attitudes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000280

Abstract. This research extends the better-than-average (BTA) effect commonly observed in judgments of abilities and personality traits to the domain of attitudes. Participants reported their attitudes toward 18 sociopolitical issues and estimated the attitudes of most other people toward these issues. Consistent with the research on pro-norm and anti-norm deviance, for issues high (vs. low) in the injunctive norm, participants perceived their attitudes to be more supportive (vs. deprecatory) than the attitudes of the majority. This effect was stronger for issues that participants judged to be personally important as well as when participants estimated others’ attitudes before indicating their own attitudes.

References

  • Abrams, D., Marques, J., Bown, N. & Dougill, M. (2002). Anti-norm and pro-norm deviance in the bank and on the campus: Two experiments on subjective group dynamics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5, 163–182. doi: 10.1177/1368430202005002922 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N. & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906–912. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.906 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621–1630. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alicke, M. D. & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In M. D. AlickeD. A. DunningJ. I. KruegerEds., The Self in social judgment (pp. 85–108). New York, NY: Tailor & Francis Group. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In H. GuetzkowEd., Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482. doi: 10.1177/0146167291175001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376. doi: 10.1521/soco.1986.4.4.353 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, J. D. (2012). Understanding the better than average effect: Motives (still) matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 209–219. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432763 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chambers, J. R. & Windschitl, P. D. (2004). Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 813–838. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–622. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R. & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A. & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082–1090. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiedler, K. (2002). Frequency judgment and retrieval structures: Splitting, zooming, and merging the units of the empirical world. In P. SedlmeierT. BetschEds., Frequency processing and cognition (pp. 67–87). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiedler, K. & Unkelbach, C. (2014). Regressive judgment: Implications of a universal property of the empirical world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 361–367. doi: 10.1177/0963721414546330 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiedler, K., Unkelhach, C. & Freytag, P. (2009). On splitting and merging categories: A regression account of subadditivity. Memory & Cognition, 37, 383–393. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.4.383 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gold, R. S. (2008). Unrealistic optimism and event threat. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13, 193–201. doi: 10.1080/13548500701426745 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heck, P. R. & Krueger, J. I. (2015). Self-enhancement diminished. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 1003–1020. doi: 10.1037/xge0000105 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoorens, V. & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Social comparison of health risks: Locus of control, the person-positivity bias, and unrealistic optimism1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 291–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01088.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hornsey, M. J. & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248–264. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judd, C. M., Westfall, J. & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54–69. doi: 10.1037/a0028347 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kruger, J. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 221–232. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.221 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marks, G. (1984). Thinking one’s abilities are unique and one’s opinions are common. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 203–208. doi: 10.1177/0146167284102005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, D. T. & Morrison, K. R. (2009). Expressing deviant opinions: Believing you are in the majority helps. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 740–747. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Monin, B. & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The limits of direct replications and the virtues of stimulus sampling. Social Psychology, 45, 299–300. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Morrison, K. R. & Miller, D. T. (2008). Distinguishing between silent and vocal minorities: Not all deviants feel marginal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 871–882. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.871 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morrison, K. R. & Wheeler, S. C. (2010). Nonconformity defines the self: The role of minority opinion status in self-concept clarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 297–308. doi: 10.1177/0146167209358075 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Otten, W. & Van Der Pligt, J. (1996). Context effects in the measurement of comparative optimism in probability judgments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 80–101. doi: 10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.80 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prentice, D. A. & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243–256. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ross, L., Greene, D. & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stavrova, O., Schösser, T. & Köneke, V. (2016). BTA effect in attitudes (Germany). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. 2016-03-14. doi: 10.3886/E64441V1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tafarodi, R. W., Kang, S. J. & Milne, A. B. (2002). When different becomes similar: Compensatory conformity in bicultural visible minorities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1131–1142. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Warr, P. B. & Coffman, T. L. (1970). Personality, involvement and extremity of judgement. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 9, 108–121. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1970.tb00650.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wänke, M., Schwarz, N. & Noelle-Neumann, E. (1995). Asking comparative questions: The impact of the direction of comparison. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 347–372. doi: 10.1086/269481 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wood, W., Pool, G. J., Leck, K. & Purvis, D. (1996). Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1181–1193. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1181 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar