Skip to main content
Free AccessOriginal Article

Social Perception of Self-Enhancement Bias and Error

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000287

Abstract. How do social observers perceive and judge individuals who self-enhance (vs. not)? Using a decision-theoretic framework, we distinguish between self-enhancement bias and error, where the former comprises both correct and incorrect self-perceptions of being better than average. The latter occurs when a claim to be better than others is found to be false. In two studies, we find that when judging people’s competence, observers are sensitive to the accuracy of self-perception. When judging their morality, however, they tend to respond negatively to any claims of being better than average. These findings are further modulated by the domain of performance (intelligence vs. moral aptitude). Implications for the strategic use of self-enhancement claims are discussed.

References

  • Abele, A. E., Cuddy, A. J., Judd, C. M. & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2008). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Special Issue of European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063–1065. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.574 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alicke, M. D. & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In M. D. AlickeD. A. DunningJ. I. KruegerEds., The self in social judgment (pp. 85–106). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection. New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C., Ames, D. R. & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one’s status in a group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 90–101. doi: 10.1177/0146167207307489 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C., Brion, S., Moore, D. A. & Kennedy, J. A. (2012). A status-enhancement account of overconfidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 718–735. doi: 10.1037/a0029395 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baron, J. (2012). Where do non-utilitarian moral rules come from?. In J. I. KruegerEd., Social judgment and decision-making (pp. 261–278). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carli, L. L., LaFleur, S. J. & Loeber, C. C. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1030–1041. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1030 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • CBS News, Sixty Minutes. (2016, July 17). The Republican Ticket: Trump and Pence. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-trump-pence-republican-ticket/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Colvin, C. R., Block, J. & Funder, D. C. (1995). Overly positive self-evaluations and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1152–1162. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1152 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dufner, M., Denissen, J. A., Sedikides, C., Van Zalk, M., Meeus, W. H. J. & Van Aken, M. A. G. (2013). Are actual and perceived intellectual self-enhancers evaluated differently by social perceivers? European Journal of Personality, 27, 621–633. doi: 10.1002/per.1934 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunning, D. & Helzer, E. G. (2014). Beyond the correlation coefficient in studies of self-assessment accuracy: Commentary on Zell & Krizan. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 126–130. doi: 10.1177/1745691614521244 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, A. M., Dillon, K. D. & Rand, D. G. (2015). Fast but not intuitive, slow but not reflective: Decision conflict drives reaction times in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 951–966. doi: 10.1037/xge0000107 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Exline, J. J. & Geyer, A. L. (2004). Perceptions of humility: A preliminary study. Self and Identity, 3, 95–114. doi: 10.1080/13576500342000077 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldin, G. & Darlow, A. (2013). TurkGate (Version 0.4.0) [Software]. Retrieved from http://gideongoldin.github.com/TurkGate/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J. & Rozin, P. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148–168. doi: 10.1037/a0034726 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hartley, A. G., Furr, R. M., Helzer, E. G., Jayawickreme, E., Velasquez, K. R. & Fleeson, W. (2016). Morality’s centrality to liking, respecting, and understanding others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1948550616655359 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heck, P. R. & Krueger, J. I. (2015). Self-enhancement diminished. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 1003–1020. doi: 10.1037/xge0000105 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoorens, V. (2014). What’s really in a name-letter effect? Name-letter preferences in indirect measures of self-esteem. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 228–262. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2014.980085 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoorens, V., Pandelaere, M., Oldersma, F. & Sedikides, C. (2012). The Hubris hypothesis: You can self-enhance, but you’d better not show it. Journal of Personality, 80, 1237–1274. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00759.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P. & Robins, R. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206–219. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.206 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kennedy, J. A., Anderson, C. & Moore, D. A. (2013). When overconfidence is revealed to others: Testing the status-enhancement theory of overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 266–279. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.08.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, N. & Epley, N. (2016). Maybe holier, but definitely less evil, than you: Bounded self-righteousness in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 660–674. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000050 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, J. I. & Acevedo, M. (2007). Perceptions of self and other in the prisoner’s dilemma: Outcome bias and evidential reasoning. American Journal of Psychology, 120, 593–618. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, J. I. & DiDonato, T. E. (2010). Perceptions of morality and competence in (non)interdependent games. Acta Psychologica, 134, 85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, J. I., Freestone, D. & MacInnis, M. L. (2013). Comparisons in research and reasoning: Toward an integrative theory of social induction. New Ideas in Psychology, 31, 73–86. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2012.11.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, J. I., Massey, A. L. & DiDonato, T. E. (2008). A matter of trust: From social preferences to the strategic adherence to social norms. Negotiation & Conflict Management Research, 1, 31–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-4716.2007.00003.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, J. I., Vohs, K. D. & Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Is the allure of self-esteem a mirage after all? The American Psychologist, 63, 64–65. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.1.64 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kruger, J. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The “below-average effect” and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 221–232. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.221 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kwan, V. S. Y., John, O. P., Kenny, D. A., Bond, M. H. & Robins, R. W. (2004). Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review, 111, 94–110. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.94 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lafrenière, M.-A., Sedikides, C., Van Tongeren, D. R. & Davis, J. (2015). On the perceived intentionality of self-enhancement. The Journal of Social Psychology, 156, 28–42. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1041447 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lamba, S. & Nityananda, V. (2014). Self-deceived individuals are better at deceiving others. PLoS One, 9, e104562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104562 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leary, M. R. & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • MacDonald, G., Saltzman, J. L. & Leary, M. R. (2003). Social approval and trait self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 23–40. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00531-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mijović-Prelec, D. & Prelec, D. (2010). Self-deception as self-signaling: A model and experimental evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 227–240. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0218 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moore, D. A. & Cain, D. M. (2007). Overconfidence and underconfidence: When and why people underestimate (and overestimate) the competition. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 197–213. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moore, D. A. & Kim, T. G. (2003). Myopic social prediction and the solo comparison effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1121–1135. doi: 1037/0022-3514.85.6.1121 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moore, D. A. & Small, D. A. (2007). Error and bias in comparative judgment: On being both better and worse than we think we are. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 972–989. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.972 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197–1208. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1197 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Qualtrics Research Suite. (2013). [Survey software]. Provo, UT: Qualtrics. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rapoport, A. & Chammah, A. M. (1966). The game of chicken. American Behavioral Scientist, 10, 10–28. doi: 10.1177/000276426601000303 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reeder, G. D. & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61–79. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.86.1.61 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robins, R. W. & Beer, J. S. (2001). Positive illusions about the self: Short-term benefits and long-term costs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 340–352. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.340 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rozin, P. & Nemeroff, C. (1990). The laws of sympathetic magic: A psychological analysis of similarity and contagion. In J. W. StiglerR. A. ShwederG. HerdtEds., Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 205–232). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schroeder-Abé, M., Rentzsch, K., Asendorpf, J. B. & Penke, L. (2015). Good enough for an affair: Self-enhancement of attractiveness, interest in potential mates and popularity as a mate. European Journal of Personality, 30, 12–18. doi: 10.1002/per.2029 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skowronski, J. J. & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131–142. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strohminger, N. & Nichols, S. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 131, 159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M. & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 1–26. doi: 10.1111/1529-1006.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MD: Pearson Education. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, S. E. & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sherman, D. K., Sage, R. M. & McDowell, N. K. (2003). Portrait of the self-enhancer: Well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 165–176. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.165 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tenney, E. R. & Spellman, B. A. (2011). Complex social consequences of self-knowledge. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 343–350. doi: 10.1177/1948550610390965 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tenney, E. R., Vazire, S. & Mehl, M. R. (2013). This examined life: The upside of self-knowledge for interpersonal relationships. PLoS One, 8, e69605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069605 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 181–228. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Damme, C., Hoorens, V. & Sedikides, C. (2016). Why self-enhancement provokes dislike: The hubris hypothesis and the aversiveness of explicit self-superiority claims. Self and Identity, 15, 173–190. doi: 10.1080/15298868.2015.1095232 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Lange, P. A. M., Joireman, J., Parks, C. & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125–140. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Von Hippel, W. & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 1–16. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10001354 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person-and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188. doi: 10.1080/10463280500229619 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zell, E. & Krizan, Z. (2014). Do people have insight into their abilities? A metasynthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 111–125. doi: 10.1177/1745691613518075 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar