Abstract
Abstract. Individuals regularly exhibit antisocial responses after social exclusion. In four unregistered studies (1a, 1b, 2, and 3) and one preregistered experiment (Study 4), we tested the hypothesis that the excluder’s physical attractiveness reduces the relationship between social exclusion and negative responding. Results showed that exclusion by a highly attractive source caused less aggressive and more prosocial responses than exclusion by a less attractive source (Studies 1–3). The interaction effect was mediated by perceived likeability of the excluding person (Study 3). The preregistered experiment did not confirm the interactive effect between exclusion and attractiveness (Study 4); however, exploratory analyses indicated the effect on pro- (but not antisocial) responding. Inconsistent findings as well as the theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
References
2011). Does being attractive always help? Positive and negative effects of attractiveness on social decision-making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1042–1054. doi: 10.1177/0146167211410355
(2010). The effects of social exclusion on religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 742–753. doi: 10.1177/0146167210367491
(2011). My role is my castle: The appeal of family roles after experiencing social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 981–986. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.020
(2012). “Man’s best friend:” How the presence of a dog reduces mental distress after social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 446–449. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.09.011
(2008). Individual differences in the rejection-aggression link in the hot sauce paradigm: The case of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 775–782. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.004
(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
(2008). Adaptive responses to social exclusion: Social rejection improves detection of real and fake smiles. Psychological Science, 19, 981–983. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02187.x
(1993). Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1061–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.1061
(1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.616
(1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00023992
(2003). The anatomy of loneliness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 71–74. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01232
(2012). Imagined future social pain hurts more now than imagined future physical pain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 314–317. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.186
(2012). The optimal calibration hypothesis: How life history modulates the brain’s social pain network. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience, 4, 10. doi: 10.3389/fnevo.2012.00010
(2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1–15. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.1
(2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: Selective attention to signs of acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 729–741. doi: 10.1037/a0014634
(2011). Social exclusion and the desire to reconnect. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 919–932. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00383.x
(2010). Acceptance by one differs from acceptance by none: Applying social impact theory to the rejection-aggression link. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 168–174. doi: 10.1177/1948550610361387
(1998). Jealousy as a function of rival characteristics: An evolutionary perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1158–1166. doi: 10.1177/01461672982411003
(2009). The relation between popularity and aggressive, destructive, and norm-breaking behaviors: Moderating effects of athletic abilities, physical attractiveness, and prosociality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 401–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00594.x
(1972). Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children’s transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 207–213. doi: 10.1037/h0033372
(1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290. doi: 10.1037/h0033731
(1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327
(1991). Natural observations of the links between attractiveness and initial legal judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 541–547. doi: 10.1177/0146167291175009
(1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
(1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45–54. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
(2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292. doi: 10.1126/science.1089134
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
(1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304–341. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304
(2007). Bias against overweight job applicants: Further explorations of when and why. Human Resource Management Journal, 46, 203–222. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20157
(2005).
(Coping with rejection: Core social motives across cultures . In K. D. WilliamsJ. P. ForgasW. von HippelEds., The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 185–198). New York, NY: Psychology Press.2008). When rejection by one fosters aggression against many: Multiple-victim aggression as a consequence of social rejection and perceived groupness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 958–970. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.004
(2000). Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 486–496. doi: 10.1177/0146167200266007
(2009). On being rejected: A meta-analysis of experimental research on rejection. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 468–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01158.x
(2014). Are all ostracism experiences equal? A comparison of the autobiographical recall, Cyberball, and O-Cam paradigms. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 660–667. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0408-0
(2013). Determinanten physischer Attraktivität – der Einfluss von Durchschnittlichkeit, Symmetrie und sexuellem Dimorphismus auf die Attraktivität von Gesichtern,
([Determinants of physical attractiveness – the impact of averageness, symmetry and sexual dimorphism on human facial attractiveness] . Regensburg, Germany: Habilitation, University of Regensburg. Retrieved from http://www.beautycheck.de/cmsms/index.php/habilitationsschrift2005). The impact of physical attractiveness on women’s social status and interactional power. Sociological Forum, 20, 449–471. doi: 10.1007/s11206-005-6597-2
(2006). Language exclusion and the consequences of perceived ostracism in the workplace. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, 56–70. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.10.1.56
(2013). Beyond metaphor: contrasting mechanisms of social and physical pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.002
(2001). Reward value of attractiveness and gaze: Making eye contact enhances the appeal of a pleasing face, irrespective of gender. Nature, 413, 589–590. doi: 10.1038/35098149
(2008). Benefits of membership: The activation and amplification of group identities in response to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1200–1213. doi: 10.1177/0146167208320062
(1975). Physical attractiveness, social relations, and personality style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 245–253. doi: 10.1037/h0076286
(2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334–339. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14481
(2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
(2013). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 610–624. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.819511
(2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 202–214. doi: 10.1002/ab.10061
(1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor. The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518
(2010). What is beautiful is good because what is beautiful is desired: Physical attractiveness stereotyping as projection of interpersonal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 339–353. doi: 10.1177/0146167209359700
(2006). Facial attractiveness, sexual selection, and personnel selection: When evolved preferences matter. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 241–255. doi: 10.1002/job.357
(2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 202–223. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202
(2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42–55. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42
(2007). Can’t take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 389–401. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.389
(2010). The endocrinology of exclusion: Rejection elicits motivationally tuned changes in progesterone. Psychological Science, 21, 581–588. doi: 10.1177/0956797610362676
(2009). Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: Being rejected versus being ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 415–431. doi: 10.1037/a0012958
(2013).
(How and when exclusion motivates social reconnection . In C. N. DeWallEd., The Oxford handbook of social exclusion (pp. 121–131). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.2015). Sugar or spice: Using I3 metatheory to understand how and why glucose reduces rejection-related aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 537–543. doi: 10.1002/ab.21593
(2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095–1107. doi: 10.1177/0146167203262085
(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
(2011). Explaining the paradoxical rejection-aggression link: The mediating effects of hostile intent attributions, anger, and decreases in state self-esteem on peer rejection-induced aggression in youth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 955–963. doi: 10.1177/0146167211410247
(2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365–383. doi: 10.1037/a0015250
(2014). Orders to shoot (a camera): Effect of ostracism on obedience. Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 208–216. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.883354
(2010). Paying to belong: When does rejection trigger ingratiation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 802–823. doi: 10.1037/a0020013
(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(2014). A matter of vertical position consequences of ostracism differ for those above versus below its perpetrators. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 149–157. doi: 10.1177/1948550613488953
(1973). Deviance and respectability: An observational study of reactions to shoplifting. Social Forces, 51, 417–426. doi: 10.1093/sf/51.4.417
(2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 56–66. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.56
(2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058–1069. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058
(2007). Replenishing connectedness: Reminders of social activity reduce aggression after social exclusion. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 205–224. doi: 10.1348/014466605X90793
(2015). Responses to exclusion are moderated by its perceived fairness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 280–293. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2152
(2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 213–220. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2152
(2009). “I feel your pain”: The effects of observing ostracism on the ostracism detection system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1308–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.003
(2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
(2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 279–314. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00406-1
(2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748
(2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on ostracism and interpersonal acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 38, 174–180. doi: 10.3758/BF03192765
(1997). Social ostracism by one’s coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 693–706. doi: 10.1177/0146167297237003
(2010). Eye gaze as relational evaluation: Averted eye gaze leads to feelings of ostracism and relational devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 869–882. doi: 10.1177/0146167210370032
(2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficint to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006
(