Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Contact With Gay Men and Lesbian Women Moderates the Negative Relationship Between Religiosity and Endorsement of Same-Sex Unions’ and Families’ Rights

Published Online:May 19, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000416

Abstract

Abstract. This study investigated the moderation effect of contact with gay men and lesbian women on the relationship between religiosity levels with the endorsement of same-sex unions’ and families’ rights. Analyses were carried out on a national representative cross-sectional sample of 5,544 Italian adult residents (% females = 54). Multiple linear regressions coupled with an examination of the interaction between contact and religiosity showed that contact mitigated the negative relationship between religiosity and endorsement of same-sex unions’ and families’ rights, especially at lower rather than higher levels of religiosity. These results are important in terms of understandings of the relationship between religiosity and policy preference regarding same-sex unions’ and families’ rights. Contact can promote equality for gay men and lesbian women but different susceptibility levels persist between highly and less religious individuals in this respect.

References

  • Akrivopoulou, C. M. (2016). Same-sex unions in Italy and the recent European Court of Human Rights case law: A short comment on Oliari and Others versus Italy (judgment of 21.7. 2015). International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies, 4, 176–179. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRCS.2016.078276 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Allport, G. W., Clark, K., & Pettigrew, T. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Allport, G., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anderson, J., & Koc, Y. (2015). Exploring patterns of explicit and implicit anti‐gay attitudes in Muslims and Atheists. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2126 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baiocco, R., Nardelli, N., Pezzuti, L., & Lingiardi, V. (2013). Attitudes of Italian heterosexual older adults towards lesbian and gay parenting. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 10, 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-013-0129-2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baker, A. A., & Brauner-Otto, S. R. (2015). My friend is gay, but… The effects of social contact on Christian Evangelicals’ beliefs about gays and lesbians. Review of Religious Research, 57, 239–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-014-0184-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barcaccia, B., Pistella, J., Baiocco, R., Pallini, S., Saliani, A. M., Mancini, F., & Salvati, M. (2018). Forgiveness and religious practice: A study on a sample of Italian preadolescents. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 39, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2017.1381439 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barth, J., Overby, L. M., & Huffmon, S. H. (2009). Community context, personal contact, and support for an anti-gay rights referendum. Political Research Quarterly, 62, 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908317033 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Barth, J., & Parry, J. (2009). 2 < 1 + 1? The impact of contact with gay and lesbian couples on attitudes about gays/lesbians and gay-related policies. Politics & Policy, 37, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00160.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bramlett, B. H. (2012). The cross-pressures of religion and contact with gays and lesbians, and their impact on same-sex marriage opinion. Politics and Policy, 40, 13–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00337.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bréchon, P. (2007). Cross-national comparisons of individual religiosity. In J. A. BeckfordN. J. Demerath IIIEds., The SAGE handbook of the sociology of religion (pp. 463–489). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, M. J., & Henriquez, E. (2008). Socio-demographic predictors of attitudes towards gays and lesbians. Individual Differences Research, 6, 193–202. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Catholic Church. (2012). Catechism of the Catholic Church. Vatican City, Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. A., Pereira, H., & Leal, I. (2014). “The contact hypothesis” and attitudes toward same- sex parenting. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-014-0171-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cunningham, G. B., & Melton, E. N. (2013). The moderating effects of contact with lesbian and gay friends on the relationships among religious fundamentalism, sexism, and sexual prejudice. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.648029 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davies, M. (2004). Correlates of negative attitudes toward gay men: Sexism, male role norms, and male sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552233 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duck, R. J., & Hunsberger, B. (1999). Religious orientation and prejudice: The role of religious proscription, right-wing. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0903_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fingerhut, A. W. (2011). Straight allies: What predicts heterosexuals’ alliance with the LGBT community? 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 2230–2248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00807.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fisher, A., Castellini, G., Ristori, J., Casale, H., Giovanardi, G., Carone, N., … Jannini, E. (2017). Who has the worst attitudes toward sexual minorities? Comparison of transphobia and homophobia levels in gender dysphoric individuals, the general population and health care providers. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, 40, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0552-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Garner, A. (2013). Ambivalence, the intergroup contact hypothesis, and attitudes about gay rights. Politics & Policy, 41, 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12010 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gato, J., & Fontaine, A. M. (2016). Attitudes toward adoption by same-sex couples: Effects of gender of the participant, sexual orientation of the couple, and gender of the child. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 12, 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2015.1049771 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Graf, S., Paolini, S., & Rubin, M. (2014). Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2052 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Harbaugh, E., & Lindsey, E. W. (2015). Attitudes toward homosexuality among young adults: Connections to gender role identity, gender-typed activities, and religiosity. Journal of Homosexuality, 62, 1098–1125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1021635 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hodson, G. (2011). Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411409025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hodson, G., Costello, K., & MacInnis, C. C. (2013). Is intergroup contact beneficial among intolerant people? Exploring individual differences in the benefits of contact on attitudes. In G. HodsonM. HewstoneEds., Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 49–80). London, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hodson, G., & Hewstone, M. (2013). Advances in intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hodson, G., Harry, H., & Mitchell, A. (2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.558 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoffarth, M. R., & Hodson, G. (2016). Who needs imagined contact? Replication attempts examining previous contact as a potential moderator. Social Psychology, 47, 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000258 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Hoffarth, M. R., & Hodson, G. (2020). Coming out, intergroup relations, and attitudes towards LGBT rights. Oxford encyclopedia of LGBT politics and policy, Oxford University Press. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1179 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association-Europe. (2019). Annual review of the human rights situation of lesbian. Retrieved from https://www.ilga-europe.org/sites/default/files/Attachments/annual_review_2017_online.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. (2014). Survey on discriminations by gender, sexual orientation and ethnic origin. Retrieved from http://www.istat.it/en/archive/137611 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. London, UK: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Koenig, H. G., & Büssing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions, 1, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1010078 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kordsmeier, B., Tumlison, C., & Song, G. (2019). Ideological Orientations, LGBT Contact, and Formation of LGBT Policy Position. Social Science Quarterly, 100, 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12579 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kuntz, A., Davidov, E., Schwartz, S. H., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Human values, legal regulation, and approval of homosexuality in Europe: A cross‐country comparison. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2068 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Laurence, J. (2014). Reconciling the contact and threat hypotheses: Does ethnic diversity strengthen or weaken community inter-ethnic relations? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37, 1328–1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.788727 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lemmer, G., & Wagner, U. (2015). Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2079 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lewis, G. B. (2011). The friends and family plan: Contact with gays and support for gay rights. The Policy Studies Journal, 39, 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00405.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Licciardello, O., Castiglione, C., Rampullo, A., & Scolla, V. (2014). Social dominance orientation, cross-group friendship and prejudice towards homosexuals. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4988–4992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1060 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lingiardi, V., Nardelli, N., Ioverno, S., Falanga, S., Di Chiacchio, C., Tanzilli, A., & Baiocco, R. (2016). Homonegativity in Italy: Cultural issues, personality characteristics, and demographic correlates with negative attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0197-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lolliot, S., Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Al Ramiah, A., Tausch, N., & Swart, H. (2013). Generalized effects of intergroup contact: The secondary transfer effect. In G. HodsonM. HewstoneEds., Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 81–112). London, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2015). The development of online cross-group relationships among university students: Benefits of earlier (vs. later) disclosure of stigmatized group membership. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 788–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514548394 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maher, M. J. (2013). Homophobic bullying in Catholic high schools: Five US studies in heterosexism, authority, masculinity, and religion. In Z. GrossL. DaviesA.-K. DiabEds., Gender, religion and education in a chaotic postmodern world (pp. 271–284). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Massey, S. G., Merriwether, A. M., & Garcia, J. R. (2013). Modern prejudice and same-sex parenting: Shifting judgments in positive and negative parenting situations. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 9, 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2013.765257 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miles, E., & Crisp, R. J. (2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pacilli, M. G., Taurino, A., Jost, J. T., & van der Toorn, J. (2011). System justification, right-wing conservatism, and internalized homophobia: Gay and lesbian attitudes toward same-sex parenting in Italy. Sex Roles, 65, 580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9969-5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Petruccelli, I., Baiocco, R., Ioverno, S., Pistella, J., & D’Urso, G. (2015). Famiglie possibili: uno studio sugli atteggiamenti verso la genitorialità di persone gay e lesbiche [Possible families: A study on attitudes towards parenting of gay and lesbian people]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 42, 805–808. https://doi.org/10.1421/81943 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Piumatti, G. (2017). A mediational model explaining the connection between religiosity and anti-homosexual attitudes in Italy: The effects of male role endorsement and homosexual stereotyping. Journal of Homosexuality, 64, 1961–1977. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1289005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Piumatti, G., & Russo, S. (2019). Moderators of linear and nonlinear associations between religiosity, xenophobia, and tolerance toward immigrants in Italy. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 11, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000223 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ragone, S., & Volpe, V. (2016). An emerging right to a “gay” family life? The case Oliari v. Italy in a comparative perspective. German Law Journal, 17, 451–485. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200019830 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rampullo, A., Castiglione, C., Licciardello, O., & Scolla, V. (2013). Prejudice toward gay men and lesbians in relation to cross-group friendship and gender. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.557 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reimer, N. K., Becker, J. C., Benz, A., Christ, O., Dhont, K., Klocke, U., Neji, S., … Hewstone, M. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Salvati, M., Piumatti, G., Giacomantonio, M., & Baiocco, R. (2019). Gender stereotypes and contact with gay men and lesbians: The mediational role of sexism and homonegativity. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2412 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sakalh, N., & Ugurlu, O. (2002). Effects of social contact with homosexuals on heterosexual Turkish university students’ attitudes towards homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v42n01_03 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sani, G. M. D., Knijn, T., Naldini, M., Solera, C., & Yerkes, M. A. (2018). National attitudes as a barrier to European citizenship rights? The case of parenthood and partnership rights for individuals in diverse family forms. In T. KnijnM. NaldiniEds., Gender and generational division in EU citizenship (pp. 60–84). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Song, M. K., Lin, F. C., Ward, S. E., & Fine, J. P. (2013). Composite variables: When and how. Nursing Research, 62, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182741948 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, S. J., Axelton, A. M., & Saucier, D. A. (2009). The effects of contact on sexual prejudice: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 61, 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9627-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Świątkowski, W., & Dompnier, B. (2017). Replicability crisis in social psychology: Looking at the past to find new pathways for the future. International Review of Social Psychology, 30, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.66 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Valfort, M. (2017). LGBTI in OECD countries: A review (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 198). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Whitley, B. E. Jr. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A meta-analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508610802471104 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Worthen, M. G., Lingiardi, V., & Caristo, C. (2017). The roles of politics, feminism, and religion in attitudes toward LGBT individuals: A cross-cultural study of college students in the USA, Italy, and Spain. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14, 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0244-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yerkes, M. A., Dotti Sani, G. M., & Solera, C. (2018). Attitudes toward parenthood, partnership, and social rights for diverse families: Evidence from a pilot study in five countries. Journal of Homosexuality, 65, 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1310507 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar