Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Free AccessOriginal Article

Bullying and Conspiracy Theories

Experiences of Workplace Bullying and the Tendency to Engage in Conspiracy Theorizing

Published Online:October 27, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000492

Abstract

Abstract. Experiences of bullying in the workplace can increase anxiety, paranoia, and hypervigilance to threat in victims. Such factors are also associated with conspiracy beliefs. Two preregistered studies (cross-sectional and experimental) tested whether bullying experiences may be linked to the development of conspiracy beliefs. Study 1 (n = 273) demonstrated that experiences of workplace bullying were positively associated with conspiracy beliefs, an effect that could be explained by paranoia. In Study 2 (n = 206), participants who imagined being bullied (vs. supported) reported increased belief in conspiracy theories. Our research uncovers another antecedent of conspiracy beliefs: workplace bullying. Future research should endeavor to explore how best to support victims and avert the link between being bullied and conspiracy theorizing emerging.

References

  • Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637–647. 10.1111/0162-895X.00160 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Alsuhibani, A., Shevlin, M., Freeman, D., Sheaves, B., & Bentall, R. P. (2022). Why conspiracy theorists are not always paranoid: Conspiracy theories and paranoia form separate factors with distinct psychological predictors. PLoS ONE, 17(4), e0259053. 10.1371/journal.pone.0259053 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Anti-Bullying Alliance. (2021). Changing Faces: ChildWise survey 2021. https://anti-bullyingalliance.org.uk/tools-information/all-about-bullying/at-risk-groups/appearance-targeted-bullying First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Armaly, M. T., & Enders, A. M. (2021). 'Why Me?' The role of perceived victimhood in American politics. Political Behaviour, 1–27. Advance online publication. 10.1007/s11109-020-09662-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bartlett, J. E., & Bartlett, M. E. (2011). Workplace bullying: An integrative literature review. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(1), 69–84. 10.1177/1523422311410651 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bender, D., & Lösel, F. (2011). Bullying at school as a predictor of delinquency, violence and other anti-social behaviour in adulthood. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21(2), 99–106. 10.1002/cbm.799 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bernstein, R. E., Delker, B. C., Knight, J. A., & Freyd, J. J. (2015). Hypervigilance in college students: Associations with betrayal and dissociation and psychometric properties in a Brief Hypervigilance Scale. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 7(5), 448–455. 10.1037/tra0000070 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 998–1012. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(1), Article 279. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper-Thomas, H., Gardner, D., O'Driscoll, M., Catley, B., Bentley, T., & Trenberth, L. (2013). Neutralizing workplace bullying: The buffering effects of contextual factors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(4), 384–407. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1108/JMP-12-2012-0399 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Douglas, K. (2021). COVID-19 conspiracy theories. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 24(2), 270–275. 10.1177/1368430220982068 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Douglas, K. M., & Leite, A. C. (2017). Suspicion in the workplace: Organisational conspiracy theories and work-related outcomes. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 486–506. 10.1111/bjop.12212 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. 10.1177/0963721417718261 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(1), 3–35. 10.1111/pops.12568 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. I., & Matthiesen, S. B. (1994). Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality. An exploratory study. The European Work and Organisational Psychologist, 4(4), 381–401. 10.1080/13594329408410497 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fenigstein, A., & Vanable, P. A. (1992). Paranoia and self-consciousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(1), 129–138. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.1.129 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the Workplace Ostracism Scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1348–1366. 10.1037/a0012743 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fisher, H. L., Appiah-Kusi, E., & Grant, C. (2012). Anxiety and negative self-schemas mediate the association between childhood maltreatment and paranoia. Psychiatry Research, 196(2-3), 323–324. 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Franks, B., Bangerter, A., Bauer, M. W., Hall, M., & Noort, M. C. (2017). Beyond “monologicality”? Exploring conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1), 861. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00861 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Freeman, D., Pugh, K., Green, C., Valmaggia, L., Dunn, G., & Garety, P. (2007). A measure of state persecutory ideation for experimental studies. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(9), 781–784. 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318145a0a9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gamian-Wilk, M., & Madeja-Bien, K. (2018). Ostracism in the workplace. In P. D’CruzE. NoronhaL. KeashlyS. Tye-Williams (Eds.), Special topics and particular occupations, professions and sectors (pp. 1–30). Springer Nature First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Grzesiak-Feldman, M. (2013). The effect of high-anxiety situations on conspiracy thinking. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 32(1), 100–118. 10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Grzesiak-Feldman, M., & Ejsmont, A. (2008). Paranoia and conspiracy thinking of Jews, Arabs, Germans, and Russians in a Polish sample. Psychological Reports, 102(3), 884–886. 10.2466/pr0.102.3.884-886 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimisation and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(4), 441–455. 10.1111/1469-7610.00629 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hewett, R., Liefooghe, A., Visockaite, G., & Roongrerngsuke, S. (2018). Bullying at work: Cognitive appraisal of negative acts, coping, wellbeing, and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(1), 71–84. 10.1037/ocp0000064 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2018). How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine-grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 909–926. 10.1002/ejsp.2494 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jack, A. H., & Egan, V. (2018). Childhood bullying, paranoid thinking and the misappraisal of social threat: Trouble at school. School Mental Health, 10(1), 26–34. 10.1007/s12310-017-9238-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 35–56. 10.1111/bjop.12018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., Leite, A., & Schrader, T. (2019). Belief in conspiracy theories and intentions to engage in everyday crime. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 534–549. 10.1111/bjso.12311 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., Skipper, Y., Thomas, E., & Cookson, D. (2021). Measuring adolescents’ beliefs in conspiracy theories: Development and validation of the Adolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 499–520. 10.1111/bjdp.12368 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jolley, D., & Jaspal, R. (2020). Discrimination, HIV conspiracy theories and pre-exposure prophylaxis acceptability in gay men. Sexual Health, 17(6), 525–533. 10.1071/SH20154 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jolley, D., Marques, D., & Cookson, D. (2022). Shining a spotlight on the dangerous consequences of conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology. 47(1), 101363. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101363 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jolley, D., & Paterson, J. (2020). Pylons ablaze: Examining the role of 5G COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 628–640. 10.1111/bjso.12394 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Judd, C. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Muller, D. (2014). Mediation and moderation. In H. ReisC. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 653–676). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511996481.030 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lalot, F., Abrams, D., & Travaglino, G. A. (2021). Aversion amplification in the emerging COVID-19 pandemic: The impact of political trust and subjective uncertainty on perceived threat. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 213–222. 10.1002/casp.2490 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lamberty, P., & Imhoff, R. (2018). Powerful pharma and its marginalised alternatives? Effects of individual differences in conspiracy mentality on attitudes toward medical approaches. Social Psychology, 49(5), 255–270. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000347 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Lantian, A., & Jolley, D. (2022). Data, materials, and preregistration for “Bullying and conspiracy theories.” https://osf.io/4t6bp/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M. (2007). A major event has a major cause: Evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Social Psychological Review, 9(2), 18–28. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165–184. 10.1080/13594329608414853 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McClelland, G. H. (2014). Unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis. In H. T. ReisC. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 608–626). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/cbo9780511996481.028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nauman, S., Malik, S. Z., & Jalil, F. (2019). How workplace bullying jeopardizes employees' life satisfaction: The roles of job anxiety and insomnia. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 2292. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02292 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nielsen, M. B., Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2011). Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In S. EinarsenH. HoelD. ZapfC. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace developments in theory, research and practice. CRC Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Notelaers, G., Van der Heijden, B., Hoel, H., & Einarsen, S. (2019). Measuring bullying at work with the Short-Negative Acts Questionnaire: Identification of targets and criterion validity. Work & Stress, 33(1), 58–75. 10.1080/02678373.2018.1457736 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style (s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. 10.1111/ajps.12084 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pantazi, M., Gkinopoulos, T., Witkowska, M., Klein, O., & Bilewicz, M. (2022). Historia est magistra vitae”? The impact of historical victimhood on current conspiracy beliefs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 581–601. 10.1177/1368430220968898 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Poon, K-T., Chen, Z., & Wong, W-Y. (2020). Beliefs in conspiracy theories following ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(8), 1234–1246. 10.1177/0146167219898944 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213–1232. 10.1177/00187267035610003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilise? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shetgiri, R. (2013). Bullying and victimization among children. Advances in Pediatrics, 60(1), 33–51. 10.1016/j.yapd.2013.04.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Singham, T., Viding, E., Schoeler, T., Arseneault, L., Ronald, A., Cecil, C. M., McCrory, E., Rijsdijk, F., & Pingault, J. B. (2017). Concurrent and longitudinal contribution of exposure to bullying in childhood to mental health: The role of vulnerability and resilience. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(11), 1112–1119. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2678 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sjåstad, H., Zhang, M., Espegren, A., & Baumeister, R. (2021). Social exclusion reduces happiness by creating expectations of future rejection. Self and Identity, 20(1), 116–125. 10.1080/15298868.2020.1779119 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Snaith, R. P. (2003). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Health Quality Life Outcomes, 1(1), 29. 10.1186/1477-7525-1-29 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stassen Berger, K. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten?. Developmental Review, 27(1), 90–126. 10.1016/j.dr.2006.08.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323–333. 10.1177/1750698017701615 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Prooijen, J.-W., & Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 109–115. 10.1002/ejsp.1922 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vreeman, R. C., & Carroll, A. E. (2007). A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161(1), 78–88. 10.1001/archpedi.161.1.78 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yzerbyt, V., Muller, D., Batailler, C., & Judd, C. M. (2018). New recommendations for testing indirect effects in mediational models: The need to report and test component paths. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 929–943. 10.1037/pspa0000132 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar