Leader-Member Exchange and Innovative Behavior
The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment
Abstract
This study investigates the process underlying the relationship between leadership and employees’ innovative workplace behavior. By combining findings from leader-member exchange (LMX) theory and from research on psychological empowerment, we propose that empowerment mediates the effects of LMX on innovative behavior. We tested the proposed process model with a structural equation model based on a time-lagged questionnaire study with a sample of 225 employees. This design allowed us to investigate the proposed effects under control of the temporal stability of innovative behavior. In partial support of the hypotheses, the model revealed a full mediation of LMX on subsequent innovation behavior via psychological empowerment. The indirect effect was significant even when controlling for the stability of innovative behavior over time.
References
2006). Leader-member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59, 793–801. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.03.003
(2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 1–18. doi: 10.1002/job.283
(1997). Leader-member exchange and transformational leadership: An empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader-member dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 477–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00643
(2007). A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 331–346. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.331
(2007). Leader-member exchange and member performance: A new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 202–212. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.202
(2008). Innovative Work Behavior: Measurement and Validation. Zoetermeer: Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs: SCALES Unpublished Manuscript.
(2011). The effects of leader-member exchange and organizational identification on performance and turnover among salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 31, 21–34. doi: 10.2753/PSS0885-3134310102
(1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634. doi: 10.2307/258314
(2012). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38, 1715–1759. doi: 10.1177/0149206311415280
(2001). The leader-member exchange as a link between managerial trust and employee empowerment. Group & Organization Management, 26, 53–69. doi: 10.1177/1059601101261004
(1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. In , Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201–1245). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
(1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A development approach. In , Leadership frontiers (pp. 143–165). Kent, OH: Kent State University.
(1982). Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 868–872. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.67.6.868
(1987). Towards a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
(1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi level multi domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
(2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
(1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 21, 107–112. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275
(1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member-exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance in predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680–694. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.84.5.680
(1990). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317–325. doi: 10.2307/2393393
(2008). Mediation analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
(1999). Psychological empowerment as a multidimensional construct: A test of construct validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 127–142. doi: 10.1177/0013164499591009
(2007). The impact of leader-member-exchange quality, empowerment, and core self-evaluation on nurse manager’s job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Administration, 37, 221–229. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000269746.63007.08
(1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 143–172. doi: 10.1177/014920639802400105
(1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In , Research in personnel and human resource management, Vol. 15, (pp. 47–119). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
(2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 407–416. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.407
(1993). A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchanges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662–674. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.78.4.662
(1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175–199. doi: 10.1002/job.237
(2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 609–623. doi: 10.1002/job.650
(1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544. doi: 10.1177/014920638601200408
(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
(2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 2.15). Vienna, Austria R Foundation for Statistical Computing Retrieved from www.R-project.org
. (2012). Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft. Indikatorenbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2011.
([Innovation behavior of the German Economy] Mannheim, Germany: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (ZEW).2012). Time and change in teams: Where we are and where we are moving. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 629–656. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.729821
(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
(2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76, 130–147. doi: 10.1509/jm.10.0494
(2010). How to support innovative behaviour? The role of LMX and satisfaction with HR practices. Technology and Investment, 1, 59–68. doi: 10.4236/ti.2010.11007
(1986). When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader-member exchange and decision influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 579–584. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.71.4.579
(2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23–74.
(2011). Effects of vice-principals’ psychological empowerment on job satisfaction and burnout. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 252–264. doi: 10.1108/09513541111120097
(1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63–113. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)80009-5
(2000). Investigating contingencies: An examination of the impact of span of supervision and upward controllingness on leader-member exchange using traditional and multivariate within- and between-entities analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 659–677. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.659
(2002). Überprüfung einer deutschsprachigen Skala zum Leader – Member-Exchange-Ansatz.
([Evaluation of a German scale for the assessment of leader–member exchange] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23, 235–245. doi: 10.1024//0170-1789.23.2.2352012). Can some leaders have a good relationship with many followers? The role of personality in the relationship between leader-member exchange and span of control. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 33, 594–606. doi: 10.1108/01437731211253046
(2005). Comparing antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange in a German working context to findings in the US. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 1–22. doi: 10.1108/01437730810906362
(2008). The relationship between leader-member exchange and outcomes as rated by leaders and followers. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29, 631–646. doi: 10.1108/01437730810906362
(1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607. doi: 10.2307/256701
(2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 332–349. doi: 10.2307/20159585
(2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 981–1003. doi: 10.1037/a0022676
(2012). The relationship between psychological empowerment and innovative behavior: A dimensional analysis with job involvement as mediator. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11, 127–137. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000065
(1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. The Academy of Management Review, 22, 522–552. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1997.9707154068
(1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1442–1465. doi: 10.2307/256865
(1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 483–504. doi: 10.2307/256789
(2008). Taking stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work. In , Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 54–72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An ‘interpretive’ model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666–681. doi: 10.2307/258687
(1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
(2002). Gender, race, and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships: The moderating role of relationship duration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 240–262. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1855
(1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types, effects, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228–234. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.73.2.228
(1984). The vertical dyad linkage model of leadership: Problems and prospects. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 5–20. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90035-7
(1988). Japanese management progress: Mobility into middle management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 217–227. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.217
(2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader-member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 204–213. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp. 2010.11.002
(2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
(1999). Determinants of delegation and consultation by managers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 219–232. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199903)20:2<219::AID-JOB922>3.0.CO;2-8
(1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 261–276. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.261
(2012). Supervisors’ upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: Testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 668–680. doi: 10.1037/a0026305
(