Social Networking Websites in Personnel Selection
A Signaling Perspective on Recruiters’ and Applicants’ Perceptions
Abstract
Industry surveys and media reports suggest that recruiters increasingly use social networking websites (SNWs) in the selection process, but corresponding scientific research is still limited. Using signaling theory, we examine SNWs as a new way for applicants to signal their qualities to recruiters. Results suggest that recruiters and potential applicants (students and graduates) both perceive professional SNWs (e.g., LinkedIn) as a potential antecedent of Person-Job fit information and personal SNWs (e.g., Facebook) as a potential antecedent of Person-Organization fit information. When evaluating the same SNW profile, recruiters and potential applicants focus on different sections of the profile (e.g., recruiters focus more on job-related information), but they tend to infer similar personality traits. Implications for using SNWs in selection are discussed.
References
2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21, 372–374.
(2012). Personnel selection as a signaling game. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 719–738.
(1986). A comparison of selection decision models in manager versus student samples. Personnel Psychology, 39, 599–617.
(2010). The influence of social networking web sites on the evaluation of job candidates. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 341–347.
(2008). The newest way to screen job applicants: A social networker’s nightmare. Federal Communication Law Journal, 60, 597–626.
(2011). The writing on the (Facebook) wall: The use of social networking sites in hiring decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 219–225.
(2009). Nearly half of employers use social networking sites to screen job candidates. CareerBuilder.com Survey Finds. Retrieved from thehiringsite.careerbuilder.com/2009/08/20/nearly-half-of-employers-use-social-networking-sites-to-screen-job-candidates/
(2010). Employer’s use of social networking sites: A socially irresponsible practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 507–525.
(2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836.
(1992). Revised neo personality inventory (neo pi-r) and neo five-factor inventory (neo-ffi). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
(2004). Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: An experimental study. Marketing Letters, 15, 21–36.
(2012). The selection interview from the interviewer and applicants perspective: Can’t have one without the other. In , The Oxford handbook of personnel selection and assessment (pp. 323–352). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(2007). Job candidates getting tripped up by facebook. MSNBC. Retrieved from www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20202935/from/ET/.
(2010). Generation Y hide your secrets? The e.impression and interview ratings. Paper presented at the 25th Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.
(2010). Who’s posting Facebook faux pas? A cross-cultural examination of personality differences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 174–186.
(2009). Future employment selection methods: evaluating social networking web sites. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24, 567–580.
(2000). Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters’ perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Personnel Psychology, 53, 643–671.
(1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
(2008). Social networking profiles: An examination of student attitudes regarding use and appropriateness of content. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11, 95–97.
(2009). Social networking web sites and human resource personnel. Business Communication Quarterly, 72, 110–114.
(2011). Training students to increase employment opportunity using social networking websites. Paper presented at the 26th Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
(2009). Constructing the self through the photo selection-Visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3(1), Retrieved from cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2009061501&article=1.
(1991). Relative effect of applicant work experience and academic qualification on selection interview decisions: A study of between-sample generalizability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 550–559.
(2012). Reactions to using social networking websites in pre-employment screening. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
(2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one’s profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 15, 314–335.
(2004). e-Perceptions: Personality impressions based on personal websites. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 123–132.
(2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28–49.
(2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203–220.
(