Skip to main content
Review Article

Do High Working Memory Groups Perform Better?

A Conceptual Approach Linking Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity to Group Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000111

A growing body of research shows that individual differences in working memory capacity play a pivotal role for a large number of higher order cognitive tasks. Surprisingly, however, the impact of individual differences in working memory capacity on group performance has received little attention. In this conceptual article, we focus on three typical group tasks (group idea generation, group decision making, group judgment) and, for each task, provide an analysis of how individual differences in working memory capacity might affect group performance. Our key idea is that group interaction is a cognitively demanding task as group members have to continuously monitor the ongoing conversation, hold their ideas in memory, integrate the information put forth by others, and update their mental representations accordingly. Therefore, individual differences in working memory capacity are presumed to have a profound impact on how people process information during group interaction.

References

  • Ackerman, P. L. , Beier, M. E. , Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ackerman, P. L. , Cianciolo, A. T. (2000). Cognitive, perceptual-speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 259–290. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alloway, T. P. (2009). Working memory, but not IQ, predicts subsequent learning in children with learning difficulties. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 92–98. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Anguera, J. A. , Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. , Willingham, D. T. , Seidler, R. D. (2010). Contributions of spatial working memory to visuomotor learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1917–1930. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baddeley, A. D. , Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. Bower, (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-Level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Betts, K. R. , Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Collaborative memory performance: Processes, performance and techniques for improvement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 119–130. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brewin, C. R. , Smart, L. (2005). Working memory capacity and suppression of intrusive thoughts. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 36, 61–68. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bühner, M. , König, C. J. , Pick, M. , Krumm, S. (2006). Working memory dimensions as differential predictors of the speed and error aspect of multitasking performance. Human Performance, 19, 253–275. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clarkson-Smith, L. , Hartley, A. A. (1990). The game of bridge as an exercise in working memory and reasoning. Journal of Gerontology, 45, 233–238. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Colom, R. , Flores-Mendoza, C. , Quiroga, M. Á. , Privado, J. (2005). Working memory and general intelligence: The role of short-term storage. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1005–1014. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Colom, R. , Rebollo, I. , Palacios, A. , Juan-Espinosa, M. , Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277–296. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Daneman, M. , Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Daneman, M. , Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 422–433. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. , Nijstad, B. A. , Baas, M. , Wolsink, I. , & Roskes, M. (2012). Working memory benefits creative insight, musical improvisation and original ideation through maintained task-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 656–669. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deiglmayr, A. , Spada, H. (2010). Collaborative problem-solving with distributed information: The role of inferences from interdependent information. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 361–378. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Diehl, M. , & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dougherty, M. R. P. , Hunter, J. (2003). Probability judgment and subadditivity: The role of working memory capacity and constraining retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 31, 968–982. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Einhorn, H. J. , Hogarth, R. M. , Klempner, E. (1977). Quality of group judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 158–172. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Engle, R. W. , Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. H. Ross, (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 145–199). New York, NY: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Faulmüller, N. , Kerschreiter, K. , Mojzisch, A. , Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Beyond group-level explanations for the failure of groups to solve hidden profiles: The individual preference effect revisited. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 653–671. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fraidin, S. N. (2004). When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 102–113. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greitemeyer, T. , Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322–339. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hackman, J. R. , Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 8, (pp. 47–99). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hinsz, V. B. , Tindale, R. S. , Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43–64. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofmann, W. , Schmeichel, B. J. , Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 174–180. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ilkowska, M. , Engle, R. W. (2010). Trait and state differences in working memory capacity. In A. Gruszka, G. Matthews, B. Szymura, (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 295–320). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonides, J. , Smith, E. E. (1997). The architecture of working memory. In M. D. Rugg, (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience (pp. 243–276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kane, M. J. , Engle, R. W. (2000). Working memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 333–358. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kane, M. J. , Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kane, M. J. , Hambrick, D. Z. , Conway, A. R. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • King, J. , & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580–602. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kohn, N. W. , Paulus, P. B. , Choi, Y. (2011). Building on the ideas of others: An examination of the idea combination process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 554–561. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krumm, S. , Lipnevich, A. A. , Schmidt-Atzert, L. , Bühner, M. (2012). Relational integration as a predictor of academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 759–769. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krumm, S. , Schmidt-Atzert, L. , Bühner, M. , Ziegler, M. , Michalczyk, K. , Arrow, K. (2009). Storage and non-storage components of working memory predicting reasoning: A simultaneous examination of a wide range of ability factors. Intelligence, 37, 347–364. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krumm, S. , Ziegler, M. , Bühner, M. (2008). Reasoning and working memory as predictors of school grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 248–257. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kyllonen, P. C. , Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389–433. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kyllonen, P. C. , Dennis, A. (1996). Is working memory capacity Spearman’s g. In I. Dennis, P. Tapsfield, (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 49–75). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kyllonen, P. C. , Stephens, D. L. (1990). Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 129–160. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Larson, J. R. Jr. (2010). In search of synergy in small group performance. New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lewin, K. (1945). The Research Center for Group Dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sociometry, 8, 126–136. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Littlepage, G. , Robison, W. , Reddington, K. (1997). Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 133–47. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Littlepage, G. , Schmidt, G. , Whisler, E. , & Frost, A. (1995). An input- process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 877–889. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lu, L. , Yuan, Y. C. , McLeod, P. L. (2012). Twenty-five years of hidden profiles in group decision making: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 54–75. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miyake, A. , Friedman, N. P. , Emerson, M. J. , Witzki, A. H. , Howerter, A. , Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mojzisch, A. , Schulz-Hardt, S. (2006). Information sampling in group decision making: Sampling biases and their consequences. In K. Fiedler, P. Juslin, (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 299–325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mojzisch, A. , Schulz-Hardt, S. (2010). Knowing others’ preferences degrades the quality of group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 794–808. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mojzisch, A. , Schulz-Hardt, S. , Kerschreiter, R. , Brodbeck, F. C. , Frey, D. (2008). Social validation in group decision making: Differential effects on the decisional impact of preference-consistent and preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1477–1490. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nijstad, B. A. , Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norman, D. A. , Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behaviour. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, D. Shapiro, (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Plenum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oberauer, K. , Schulze, R. , Wilhelm, O. , & Süß, H. M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence – their correlation and their relation: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 61–65. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oberauer, K. , Süß, H. M. , Schulze, R. , Wilhelm, O. , & Wittmann, W. W. (2000). Working memory capacity – facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oberauer, K. , Süß, H. M. , Wilhelm, O. , Wittman, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167–193. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oberauer, K. , Süß, H. M. , Wilhelm, O. , Wittmann, W. W. (2008). Which working memory functions predict intelligence? Intelligence, 36, 641–652. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Scribner. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pennington, N. , Hastie, R. (1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition, 49, 123–163. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Redick, T. S. , Broadway, J. M. , Meier, M. E. , Kuriakose, P. S. , Unsworth, N. , Kane, M. J. , Engle, R. W. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 164–171. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Sassenberg, K. , Woltin, K. A. (2008). Group-based self-regulation: The effects of regulatory focus. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 126–164. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmeichel, B. J. , Volokhov, R. , Demaree, H. A. (2008). Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1526–1540. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. L. , Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scholten, L. , van Knippenberg, D. , Nijstad, B. , De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Motivated information processing and group decision making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 539–552. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schultze, T. , Mojzisch, A. , Schulz-Hardt, S. (2012). Why groups perform better than individuals at quantitative judgment tasks: Group-to-individual transfer as an alternative to differential weighting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 24–36. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schulz-Hardt, S. , Brodbeck, F. C. (2012). Group performance and leadership. In M. Hewstone, W. Stroebe, K. Jonas, (Eds.), An introduction to social psychology (5th ed.). (pp. 415–447). Chichester, UK: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schulz-Hardt, S. , Mojzisch, A. (2012). How to achieve synergy in group decision making: Lessons to be learned from the hidden profile paradigm. European Review of Social Psychology, 23, 305–343. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sniezek, J. A. , Henry, R. A. (1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 1–28. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sniezek, J. A. , Henry, R. A. (1990). Revision, weighting and commitment in consensus group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 66–84. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, A. Simpson, (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 48–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stasser, G. , Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Süß, H. M. , Oberauer, K. , Wittmann, W. W. , Wilhelm, O. , Schulze, R. (2002). Working-memory capacity explains reasoning ability – and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, D. W. , Berry, P. C. , Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 23–47. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Unsworth, N. , Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wittenbaum, G. M. , Hollingshead, A. B. , Botero, I. C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286–310. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar