Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Predicting Readiness for Diversity Training

The Influence of Perceived Ethnic Discrimination and Dyadic Dissimilarity

Published Online:September 22, 2016https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000170

Abstract

Abstract. Using data collected from 160 employed professionals in the US, we performed multivariate and univariate multiple regression analyses to examine the joint effect of perceived ethnic discrimination and ethnic dyadic dissimilarity on trainee readiness for diversity training (pre-training motivation to learn, self-efficacy, intention to use, and perceived utility). A significant interaction effect showed that individuals displayed stronger pre-training motivation to learn, intention to use, and perceived utility when they perceived discrimination based on ethnic background and when they were ethnically dissimilar to their supervisor. However, perceived ethnic discrimination was not associated with these three readiness variables when subordinate-supervisor ethnic backgrounds were the same. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

References

  • Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W. Jr., Traver, H. & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 502, 341–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00911.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39. doi: 10.2307/258189 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F. & Wilson, D. C. (2008). What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 235–249. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.235 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Avery, D. R., Volpone, S. D., Mckay, P. K., King, E. B. & Wilson, D. C. (2012). Is relational demography relative? How employment status influences effects of supervisor-subordinate demographic similarity. Journal of Business Psychology, 27, 83–98. doi: 10.1007/s10869-011-9230-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Biernacki, P. & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10, 141–163. doi: 10.1177/004912418101000205 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, P. N. & Thacker, J. W. (1998). Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practices. NJ: Prince Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buzrukova, K., Jehn, K. A. & Spell, C. S. (2012). Reviewing diversity training: Where we have been and where we should go. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 207–227. doi: 10.5465/amle.2008.0090 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chung, Y. (2013). Trainee readiness for diversity training. Journal of Diversity Management, 8, 77–84. doi: 10.19030/jdm.v8i2.8234 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chung, Y., Liao, H., Jackson, S. E., Subramony, M. A., Colakoglu, S. & Jiang, Y. (2015). Cracking but not breaking: Joint effects of faultline strength and diversity climate on loyal behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1495–1515. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0829 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A. & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 855, 678–707. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Combs, G. M. & Luthans, F. (2007). Diversity training: Analysis of the impact of self-efficacy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 91–120. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1193 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corobot-Mason, D., Konrad, A. M. & Linnehan, F. (2006). Measures for quantitative diversity scholarship. In A. M. KonradP. PrasadJ. K. PringleEds., Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 237–270). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dattalo, P. (2013). Analysis of multiple dependent variables. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199773596.001.0001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (2015). Charge statistics FY 1997 through FY 2014, Retrieved from http://www1.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/charges.cfm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ford, J. K. & Noe, R. A. (1987). Self-assessed training needs: The effects of attitudes towards training, managerial level, and function. Personnel Psychology, 40, 39–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb02376.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Green, K. W., Whitten, D. & Medlin, B. (2005). Impact of relational differences on supervisor/subordinate dyad. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105, 369–383. doi: 10.1108/02635570510590165 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldman, B. M., Gutek, B. A., Stein, J. H. & Lewis, K. (2006). Employment discrimination in organizations: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management, 32, 786–830. doi: 10.1177/0149206306293544 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gully, S. M. & Chen, G. (2010). Individual differences, attribute-treatment interactions, and training outcomes. In S. W. J. KozlowskiE. SalasEds., Learning, training, and development in organizations (pp. 3–64). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, SIOP Organizational Frontiers Series. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Holladay, C. L., Knight, J. L., Paige, D. L. & Quiñones, M. A. (2003). The influence of framing on attitudes toward diversity training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14, 245–263. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1065 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • James, K., Lavato, C. & Cropanzano, R. (1994). Correlation and known-group comparison validation of a workplace prejudice/discrimination inventory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1573–1592. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01563.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kalinoski, Z. T., Steele-Johnson, D., Peyton, E. J., Leas, K. A., Steinke, J. & Bowling, N. A. (2013). A meta-analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 1076–1104. doi: 10.1002/job.1839 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • King, E. B., Dawson, J. F., Kravitz, D. A. & Gulick, L. M. V. (2012). Multilevel relationships between diversity training, discrimination, and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 5–20. doi: 10.1002/job.728 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kulik, C. T., Pepper, M. B., Roberson, L. & Parker, S. K. (2007). The rich get richer: Predicting participation in voluntary diversity training. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 753–769. doi: 10.1002/job.444 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lau, D. C., Lam, L. W. & Salamon, S. D. (2008). The impact of relational demographics on perceived managerial trustworthiness: Similarity or norms? Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 187–208. doi: 10.3200/socp.148.2.187-209 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mathieu, J. E. & Martineau, J. W. (1997). Individual and situational influences on training motivation. In J. K. FordS. W. J. KozlowskiK. KraigerE. SalasM. S. TeachoutEds., Improving training effectiveness in work organizations (pp. 193–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I. & Salas, E. (1992). Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 828–847. doi: 10.2307/256317 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mor Barak, M. E., Cherin, D. A. & Berkman, S. (1998). Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: Ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34, 82–104. doi: 10.1177/0021886398341006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee training and development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Noe, R. A. & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psychology, 39, 497–523. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00950.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Patrick, J., Smy, V., Tombs, M. & Shelton, K. (2012). Being in one’s chosen job determines pre-training attitudes and training outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 245–257. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02027.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Phillips, J. M. & Gully, S. M. (1997). The role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal setting process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 792–802. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.792 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roberson, L., Kulik, C. T. & Pepper, M. B. (2001). Designing effective diversity training: Influence of group composition and trainee experience. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 871–885. doi: 10.1002/job.117 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roberson, L., Kulik, C. T. & Pepper, M. B. (2003). Using needs assessment to resolve controversies in diversity training design. Group & Organization Management, 28, 148–174. doi: 10.1177/1059601102250028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roberson, L., Kulik, C. T. & Pepper, M. B. (2009). Individual and environmental factors influencing the use of transfer strategies after diversity training. Group and Organization Management, 34, 67–89. doi: 10.1177/1059601108329732 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roberson, L., Kulik, C. T. & Tan, R. Y. (2013). Effective diversity climate. In Q. M. RobersonEd., The Oxford handbook of diversity and work (pp. 341–365). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Siemsen, E., Roth, A. & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476. doi: 10.1177/1094428109351241 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sitzmann, T., Brown, K. G., Casper, W. J., Ely, K. & Zimmerman, R. E. (2008). A review and meta-analysis of the nomological network of trainee reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 280–295. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.280 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Society for Human Resource Management. (2010). SHRM research spotlight: Workplace diversity practices poll, Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/Research/SurveyFindings/Articles/Documents/DiversityFlier_FINAL_spotlight.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tracey, J. B., Hinkin, T. R., Tannenbaum, S. I. & Mathieu, J. E. (2001). The influence of individual characteristics and the work environment on varying levels of training outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 5–23. doi: 10.1002/1532-1096(200101/02)12:1%3C5::aid-hrdq2%3E3.0.co;2-j First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tsui, A. S. & O’Reilly, C. A. III (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402–423. doi: 10.2307/256368 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tsui, A. S., Porter, L. W. & Egan, T. D. (2002). When both similarities and dissimilarities matter: Extending the concept of relational demography. Human Relations, 55, 899–929. doi: 10.1177/0018726702055008176 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Turner, J. C. & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social Identity, organizations and leadership. In M. E. TurnerEd., Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 1463–1492). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dick, R., van Knippenberg, D., Hagele, S., Guillaume, Y. & Brodbeck, F. (2008). Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations, 61. doi: 10.1177/0018726708095711 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wesolowski, M. & Mossholder, K. (1997). Relational demography in supervisor-subordinate dyads: Impact on job satisfaction, burnout, and perceived procedural justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 351–362. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199707)18:4%3C351::aid-job802%3E3.0.co;2-# First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, A. R., Shanine, K. K., Leon, M. R. & Whitman, M. W. (2014). Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 1–26. doi: 10.1111/joop.12042 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wiethoff, C. (2004). Motivation to learn and diversity training: Application of the theory of planned behavior. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, 263–278. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1103 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilk, S. L. & Makarius, E. E. (2015). Choosing the company you keep: Racial relational demography outside and inside of work. Organization Science, 26, 1316–1331. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2015.0991 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar