Pay-for-Performance and Interpersonal Deviance
Competitiveness as the Match That Lights the Fire
Abstract
Abstract. Many organizations use pay-for-performance (PfP) programs in order to fuel employee motivation and performance. In the present article, we argue that PfP may also increase employees’ interpersonal deviance (i.e., active harming behavior toward coworkers) because it might induce social comparison and competition. In order to uncover the underlying process, we further argue that this effect should be particularly pronounced for employees who are high in individual competitiveness, that is, employees who have a strong desire for interpersonal comparison and aspire to be better than others. A cross-sectional field study (N = 250) and two experiments (N = 92; N = 192) provide support for our interaction hypothesis. We discuss the theoretical implications regarding PfP and competitiveness, and offer suggestions concerning the practical implementation of PfP.
References
1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York, NY: Sage.
(2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703
(2009). Predicting workplace aggression and violence. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 671–692. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163629
(2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349–360. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349
(2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 613–636. doi: 10.1037/a0026739
(2008). When employees strike back: Investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1104–1117. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1104
(1998). Effects of trait competitiveness and perceived intraorganizational competition on salesperson goal setting and performance. The Journal of Marketing, 62, 88–98. doi: 10.2307/1252289
(2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980
(2009). Performance pay and worker cooperation: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 458–469. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2008.02.012
(2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980–1008. doi: 10.1037/a0035661
(2004). Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 599–609. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.599
(2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 766–785. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004
(2015). Pay for performance does not always increase performance. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 59, 85–94. doi: 10.1026/0932-4089/a000180
(2012). A social context model of envy and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 643–666. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0804
(2011). I know what you did: The effects of interpersonal deviance on bystanders. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 80–94. doi: 10.1037/a0021708
(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202
(2008). The interactive relationship of competitive climate and trait competitiveness with workplace attitudes, stress, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 922, 899–922. doi: 10.1002/job.503
(2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453
(2014). The effect of financial incentives on performance: A quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 102–137. doi: 10.1111/joop.12039
(2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 634–650. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504114
(2007). Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 439–477. doi: 10.1080/19416521003654186
(2015). Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: Revisiting long-held beliefs. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 489–521. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111418
(1992). Pay, performance, and participation (CAHRS Working Paper #92-28). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.
(2009). Pay and performance: Individuals, groups, and executives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 251–315. doi: 10.1080/19416520903047269
(1978). The Work and Family Orientation Questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8, 21–35.
(2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24–44. doi: 10.1002/job.621
(2002). A factorial analysis of scales measuring competitiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 284–298. doi: 10.1177/0013164402062002006
(2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128–1145. doi: 10.1037/a0015978
(2011). Interactions do not only tell us when, but can also tell us how: Testing process hypotheses by interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 180–190. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.762
(1998). Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 777–787. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.777
(2006). Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multilevel model. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 126–138. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.126
(2012). The psychic cost of doing wrong: Ethical conflict, divestiture socialization, and emotional exhaustion. Journal of Management, 38, 784–808. doi: 10.1177/0149206310381133
(1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.78
(1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841–864. doi: 10.1086/261010
(2004). Linking goals to monetary incentives. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 130–133. doi: 10.5465/AME.2004.15268732
(1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
(2007, August). Inside the countrywide lending spree. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/26/business/yourmoney/26country.html?
(2011). Some ethical implications of individual competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 347–359. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-1094-4
(1983). Prizes and incentives: Towards a general theory of compensation and competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 21–43. doi: 10.2307/3003535
(2011). Can work make you sick? A meta-analysis of the relationships between job stressors and physical symptoms. Work & Stress, 25, 1–22. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2011.569175
(2013). Pay-for-performance’s effect on future employee performance: Integrating psychological and economic principles toward a contingency perspective. Journal of Management, 42, 1753–1783. doi: 10.1177/0149206313515520
(2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
(2013). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1023–1031. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
(1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615–631. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.6.615
(2012). Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 4086–4091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118373109
(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
(2010). The cost of bad behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 39, 64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.10.006
(1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572. doi: 10.2307/256693
(2015). Let the evidence speak again! Financial incentives are more effective than we thought. Human Resource Management Journal, 25, 281–293. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12080
(1999). Social loafing and expectancy-value theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1147–1158. doi: 10.1177/01461672992512008
(2003). Enron ethics (or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 243–256. doi: 10.1023/A:1024194519384
(1983). Achievement-related motives and behaviors. Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 7–74). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
(2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
(1993). Productivity and extra-role behavior: The effects of goals and incentives on spontaneous helping. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 374–381. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.3.374
(