The Relative Effects of Constructive, Laissez-Faire, and Tyrannical Leadership on Subordinate Job Satisfaction
Results From Two Prospective and Representative Studies
Abstract
Knowledge on short and long-term effects of perceived leadership behaviors on subordinates’ job satisfaction, and particularly so regarding the relative influences of constructive and destructive forms of leadership, is scarce. Based on two prospective and representative surveys, with time lags of 6 months (Study 1) and 2 years (Study 2), respectively, we investigated the relative influence of constructive, laissez-faire, and tyrannical leadership behaviors, respectively, on followers job satisfaction. Interestingly, destructive forms of leadership were the sole significant predictors in both studies. Tyrannical leadership predicted a decrease in subordinate job satisfaction over a 6-month period, while laissez-faire leadership turned out as the sole predictor of job satisfaction over a 2-year time lag. A reversed relationship was found between job satisfaction and subsequent perceived constructive leadership over the 6-month lag. Dissatisfied subordinates did not, however, report increased exposure to destructive forms of leadership, disconfirming the gloomy perception mechanism of dissatisfied and stressed subordinates to perceive their leaders in an ever more negative way. Hence, destructive forms of leadership seem to be better predictors of job satisfaction than are constructive forms of leadership which is in line with the notion that “bad is stronger than good.”
References
2012 ). Destructive leadership: Conceptualisation, measurement, prevalence and outcomes. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Bergen, Norway.2010). The prevalence of destructive leadership behaviour. British Journal of Management, 21, 438–452.
(2002). Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 673–704.
(2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and sampler set. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
(2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139–1160.
(1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
(1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
(1998). Two faces of the powerless. Coping with tyranny in organizations. In , Power and influence in organizations (pp. 203–219). London, UK: Sage.
(2008). Leaders, followers, and time. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 654–668.
(1951). An index of job satisfaction. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307–311.
(2004). The relationships between work characteristics and mental health: Examining normal, reversed and reciprocal relationships in a 4-wave study. Work & Stress, 18, 149–166.
(2005). Different mechanisms to explain the reversed effects of mental health on work characteristics. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 31, 3–14.
(2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7–52.
(2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.
(2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. In , Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead, Monographs in Leadership and Management, Vol. 2, pp. 35–66). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
(2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735–744.
(2007). Destructive leadership behaviour: A definition and conceptual model. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 207–216.
(2013). When leaders are bullies: Concepts, antecedents, and consequences. In , The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of leadership, change, and organizational development (pp. 129–153). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
(1991). Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7, 17–26.
(2003). A fit approach to work stress and health. In , The handbook of work & health psychology (pp. 549–568). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
(2014). How do occupational stressor-strain effects vary with time? A review and meta-analysis of the relevance of time lags in longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 28, 1–22.
(2007). Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: Results of a large representative study. Work & Stress, 21, 220–242.
(2008). A theoretical and empirical examination of the transactional and non-leadership dimensions of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 501–513.
(2008). Leadership is a hygiene factor. Paper presented at the 23rd annual conference of the Society for Industrial-Organizational Psychology.
(2006). Undersøkelse om arbeidsmiljø: Destruktiv atferd i arbeidslivet: Destruktiv atferd i arbeidslivet. Dokumentasjonsrapport
([A study of work environment: Destructive behaviors in working life. Documentation report] . Oslo, Norway: Statistisk sentralbyrå.1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
(1998). Interaction and nonlinear modeling: Issues and approaches. In , Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modelling (pp. 239–250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.
(2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 36–51.
(1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2005). Poor leadership. In , Handbook of work stress (pp. 89–112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York, NY: Springer.
(2012). Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 107–123.
(1996). Assessing Goodness of Fit: Is parsimony always desirable? Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 364–390.
(2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 120–137.
(2005). The external leadership of self-managing teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 497–508.
(2006). Event criticality, urgency, and duration: Understanding how events disrupt teams and influence team leader intervention. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 271–287.
(1998). Longitudinal influences of managerial support on employee well-being. Work & Stress, 12, 29–49.
(2012). The relative impact of complementary leader behaviors: Which matter most? The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 567–581.
(2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36, 94–120.
(2009). Job-satisfaction in organizational research. In , The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 196–212). London, UK: Sage.
(1998). Investigating the positive and negative sides of personal relationships: Through a lens darkly? In , The dark side of close relationships (pp. 369–393). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology, 1, 145–164.
(2010). Abusive and supportive leadership two sides of the same coin. In , The “Dark” side of management (pp. 49–67). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
(2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 138–158.
(2007). From passive recipients to active co-producers: Followers’ roles in the leadership process. In , Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl (pp. 9–39). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
(2011). Leadership takes time: Some implications of (not) taking time seriously in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 307–315.
(2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
(2010). Are leaders’ well-being, behaviours and style associated with the affective well-being of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work & Stress, 24, 107–139.
(1999). The importance of a change-centred leadership style in four organizational cultures. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 15, 289–306.
(2007). The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 80–92.
(in press ). Is avoidant leadership a root cause of subordinate stress? Longitudinal relationships between laissez-faire leadership and role ambiguity. Work & Stress.2014). Patterns of “good” and “bad” leadership behaviours, and their relationships with individual outcomes. Paper presented at the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology, London.
(1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
(2014). Cause and effect: Optimizing the designs of longitudinal studies in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 28, 1–8.
(2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.
(2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289.
(1993). Social support and undermining in close relationships: Their independent effects on the mental health of unemployed persons.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 350.
(1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. London, UK W. W. Norton & Company.
(2007). Ostracism. Annual Review Psychology, 58, 425–452.
(2014). Changes in leadership behaviors predict changes in job satisfaction and well-being in low-skilled workers: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21, 1–16. doi: 10.1177/1548051814527771
(2011). Do employees cope effectively with abusive supervision at work? An exploratory study. International Journal of Stress Management, 18, 5–8.
(