Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article

Reactance to (or Acceptance of) Stereotypes

Implicit and Explicit Responses to Group Identity Threat

Published Online:December 08, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000225

Abstract

Abstract. We propose that reactance to threats to individual freedom can be broadened to include threats to group identity and its associated values and norms. In two studies we primed women and men with (counter) stereotypical roles and measured implicit activation of reactance versus acceptance goals, task persistence, and support for system justification beliefs and collective action. Although we found no direct evidence of reactance activation, men activated acceptance when primed with gender stereotypes, whereas women did not. Further, traditional women legitimize the system after counter-stereotypical exposure, whereas progressive women (feminist identifiers) persist more in solving a task stereotypically favoring men under these conditions (Study 1). Finally, nonsexist women show higher support for collective action after stereotypical exposure when threat to their identity is blatant (Study 2). We argue that reactions to identity threats depend on the content of that identity so that the specific form reactance takes may depend on the group norms being threatened.

References

  • Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. (2002). The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 629–639. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M. & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Becker, J. C. & Wagner, U. (2009). Doing gender differently – The interplay of strength of gender identification and content of gender identity in predicting women’s endorsement of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 487–508. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.551 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brehm, J. (1993). Control, its loss, and psychological reactance. In G. WearyF. GleicherK. MarshEds., Control motivation and social cognition (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, M., Hong, Y. & Li, Q. (2004). Dynamic entitativity: Perceiving groups as actors. In V. YzerbytC. M. JuddO. CorneilleEds., The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 25–38). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Condor, S. (1986). Sex role beliefs and ‘traditional’ women: Feminist and intergroup perspectives. In S. WilkinsonEd., Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice (pp. 97–118). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • de Hoog, N. (2013). Processing of social identity threats. A defense motivation perspective. Social Psychology, 44, 361–372. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000133 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • de Lemus, S., Lupiáñez, J., Spears, R., Bukowski, M. & Moya, M. (2015). Implicit resistance to sexist role relations by women: The effects of stereotype exposure on in-group bias. Manuscript in preparation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • de Lemus, S., Spears, R., Bukowski, M., Moya, M. & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Reversing implicit gender stereotype activation as a function of exposure to traditional gender roles. Social Psychology, 44, 109–116. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000140 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Dillar, J. P. & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its roles in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144–168. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Doosje, B., Ellemers, N. & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ellemers, N., Spears, R. & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Forbes, C. E. & Schmader, T. (2010). Retraining attitudes and stereotypes to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 740–754. doi: 10.1037/a0020971 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Ablasser, C., Beyer, M., Kuban, J., Manger, A. M. & Schultz, M. (2013). The power of we: Evidence for group-based control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 19–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.014 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fritsche, I., Jonas, E. & Kessler, T. (2011). Collective reactions to threat: Implications for intergroup conflict and for solving societal crises. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 101–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01027.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Glick, P. & Fiske, S. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hewstone, M., Rubin, M. & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jiménez, L. & Méndez, C. (1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 25, 236–259. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.236 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jonas, E. & Fritsche, I. (2012). Follow the norm! Terror management theory and the influence of descriptive norms. Social Psychology, 43, 28–32. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000077 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kay, A. C. & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kossowska, M., Hanusz, K. & Trejtowicz, M. (2012). Skrócona wersja Skali Potrzeby Poznawczego Domknięcia: Dobór pozycji i walidacja skali [Shortened version of the Need for Cognitive Closure scale: Item selection and validation of the scale]. Psychologia Społeczna, 9, 89–99. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kray, L. J., Reb, J., Galinsky, A. D. & Thompson, L. (2004). Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: The effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 399–411. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kray, L. J., Thompson, L. & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 942–958. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Laurin, K., Kay, A. C. & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2012). Reactance versus Rationalization: Divergent responses to policies that constrain freedom. Psychological Science, 23, 205–209. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mandera, P., Wodniecka, Z. & Keuleers, E. (2012). Subtlex-pl: Polish word frequency estimates based on film subtitles. Poster presented at the 1st BAPS-SEPEX Joint Meeting. Belgian Association for Psychological Sciences and Spanish Society of Experimental Psychology, Liège. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mikolajczak, M. & Pietrzak, J. (2015). A broader conceptualization of ambivalent sexism. In S. SafdarN. KosakowskaEds., The psychology of gender through the lens of culture (pp. 169–191). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Miron, A. M. & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance Theory – 40 years later. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 9–18. doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.37.1.3 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Moya, M., Glick, P., Expósito, F., de Lemus, S. & Hart, J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s tolerance of paternalistic discrimination by intimate partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mullen, B., Brown, R. & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420220202 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pietrzak, J. & Mikołajczak, M. (2011). Religia a legitymizacja nierówności płciowej w Polsce [Religion a legitimization system of sex inequality in Poland]. In W. M. KoftaEd., Wobec obcych. Zagrożenia psychologiczne a stosunki międzygrupowe. Warszawa, Poland: Polskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin (114, pp. 510–532). First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sittenthaler, S., Steindl, C. & Jonas, E. (2015). Legitimate vs. illegitimate restrictions – a motivational and physiological approach investigating reactance processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00632 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Snyder, M. L. & Wicklund, R. A. (1978). Attribute ambiguity. In J. H. HarveyW. IckesR. F. KiddEds., New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 197–221). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spears, R., Jetten, J. & Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. T. JohnB. MajorEds., The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice and intergroup relations (pp. 332–362). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrated theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. AustinS. WorchelEds., The social psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. WorchelL. W. AustinEds., Psychology of Intergroup Relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taush, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P. & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148. doi: 10.1037/a0022728 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J. & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187–204. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van Breen, J., Spears, R., Kuppens, T. & de Lemus, S. (2015). Implicit Resistance to Implicit Threat: Who, When, Why? Manuscript in preparation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Worchel, S. (1972). The effect of films on the importance of behavioral freedom. Journal of Personality, 40, 417–435. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Worchel, S. (2004). The diamond in the stone: Exploring the place of free behavior in studies of human rights and culture. In R. A. WrightJ. GreenbergS. S. BrehmEds., Motivational analyses of social behavior. Building on Jack Brehm’s contributions to psychology (pp. 107–128). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Worchel, S. & Brehm, J. W. (1971). Direct and implied social restoration of freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 294–304. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar