References
2016). The learning brain: Neuronal recycling and inhibition. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 277–285. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000263
(2016). Development of reading remediation for dyslexic individuals: Added benefits of the joint consideration of neurophysiological and behavioral data. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 240–246. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000259
(2016). Behavioral and neural effects of game-based learning on improving computational fluency with numbers: An optical brain imaging study. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 297–302. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000267
(2016). Measuring implicit cognitive and emotional engagement to better understand learners’ performance in problem solving. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 294–296. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000266
(2016). Neuroscience-based approaches to teaching students on the autism spectrum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 290–293. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000265
(2016). A systematic review of the literature linking neural correlates of feedback processing to learning. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 247–256. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000260
(2010). Cognitive Neuroscience and Mathematics Learning [Special issue]. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42(6).
(Grabner, R. H.De Smedt, B.Eds.. (2016). Cognitive neuroscience and mathematics learning – revisited after five years [Special issue]. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(3).
2015). Facets of the mathematical brain – from number processing to mathematical problem solving [Special issue]. Mind, Brain and Education, 9(4).
(2016). Learning in development and education – a mechanistic understanding is needed: Commentary on Dion & Restrepo (2016). Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 307–308. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000270
(2016). The origin and functional organization of cortical areas involved in reading: Commentary on Ahr, Borst, and Houdé (2016). Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 311. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000272
(2016). Dyslexia intervention – What can we learn from neuroscience? Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 303–304. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000268
(2016). What does brain activation tell us about numerical congruity and salience? Commentary on Stavy, Babai, and Kallai (2016). Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 309–310. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000271
(2016). Event-related potentials (ERPs) reflecting feedback and error processing in the context of education. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 286–289. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000264
(2016). What are the benefits and potential problems of jointly considering neurophysiological and behavioral data in dyslexia intervention research? Commentary on Bédard, Laplante, & Mercier (2016). Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 305–306. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000269
(2007). The Brain is not enough: Potentials and limits in integrating neuroscience and pedagogy. Analyse und Kritik, 29, 38–46.
(2016). Proportional reasoning: The role of congruity and salience in behavioral and imaging research. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 266–276. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000262
(2005). Pedagogy meets neuroscience. Science, 310, 745.
(2006). Educational research and neurosciences: Expectations, evidence, research prospects (Education Reform, Vol. 13). Bonn/Berlin, Germany: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).
(2014).
(Neurosciences and learning . In D. PhillipsEd., Encyclopedia of educational theory and philosophy (pp. 572–574). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2016). The effect of a prospected reward on semantic processing: An N400 EEG study. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 257–265. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000261
(2016). The long and winding road to educationally relevant cognitive neuroscience: Commentary on Çakır, Çakır, Ayaz, and Lee (2016). Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224, 312. doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000273
(