Skip to main content
Original Article

Young People’s Engagement With the European Union

The Importance of Visions and Worries for the Future of Europe

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000314

Abstract. This study investigated whether demographic variables, efficacy beliefs, visions, and worries are associated with four different forms of (dis)engagement with the European Union (EU): intended voting in the 2019 EU elections, nonconventional political engagement, psychological engagement, and the wish that one’s own country should leave the EU. The sample comprised 3,764 young people aged 16–25 years living in seven European countries: Albania, Austria, Germany, Italy, Romania, Spain, and the UK. Economic challenges, human rights, and the environment were the most important future visions; unemployment and poverty, climate change, civil unrests, and collapse of the EU were the most important future worries. The four forms of (dis)engagement with the EU were differentially associated with predictors, although internal efficacy and future vision of economic challenges predicted all forms. Implications for future EU policy are discussed.

References

  • Albanesi, C., Mazzoni, D., Cicognani, E. & Zani, B. (2015). Predictors of civic and political participation among native and migrant youth in Italy: The role of organizational membership, sense of community, and perceived social well-being. In M. BarrettB. ZaniEds., Political and civic engagement. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 268–291). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Amnå, E. (2012). How is civic engagement developed over time? Emerging answers from a multidisciplinary field. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Amnå, E. & Ekman, J. (2015). Standby citizens: Understanding non-participation in contemporary democracies. In M. BarrettB. ZaniEds., Political and civic engagement. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 96–108). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barrett, M. (2015). An integrative model of political and civic engagement: Linking the macro, social and psychological levels of explanation. Political and civic engagement: Theoretical understandings, evidence and policies. In M. BarrettB. ZaniEds., Political and civic engagement. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 162–188). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barrett, M. & Zani, B. (2015a). Political and civic engagement. Multidisciplinary perspectives. London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barrett, M. & Zani, B. (2015b). Political and civic engagement: Theoretical understandings, evidence and policies. In M. BarrettB. Zani (Eds.), Political and civic engagement. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 3–26). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, J. C. & Tausch, N. (2014). When group memberships are negative: The concept, measurement, and behavioral implications of psychological disidentification. Self and Identity, 13, 294–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2013.819991 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brunton-Smith, I. & Barrett, M. (2015). Political and civic participation: Findings from the modeling of existing data sets. In M. BarrettB. ZaniEds., Political and civic engagement. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 195–212). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Capanna, C. & Mebane, M. (2009). Perceived political self-efficacy: Theory, assessment, and applications. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1002–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.604 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cicognani, E. & Zani, B. (2015). Social and psychological factors influencing political and civic participation: A psychosocial perspective. In M. BarrettB. ZaniEds., Political and civic engagement. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 124–145). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cicognani, E., Zani, B., Fournier, B., Gavray, C. & Born, M. (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.10.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duchesne, S. & Ratelle, C. F. (2016). Patterns of anxiety symptoms during adolescence: Gender differences and sociomotivational factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 46, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.07.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eckstein, K., Noack, P. & Gniewosz, B. (2012). Attitudes toward political engagement and willingness to participate in politics: Trajectories throughout adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.07.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ekman, J. & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22, 283–300. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gavray, C., Born, M. & Fournier, B. (2015). Participation among youth, women and migrants: Findings from the Wallonia-Brussels Federation of Belgium. In M. BarrettB. ZaniEds., Political and civic engagement. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 292–310). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Montgomery, V. (2015). Participation and integration: The contextual factors influencing minority and migrant participation. In M. BarrettB. ZaniEds., Political and civic engagement. Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 71–84). London, UK: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Prodromitis, G., Chryssochoou, X. & Papastamou, S. (2017). Accepting austerity or Grexit? Predicting acceptance of crisis solution strategies from people’s image of the Greece-EU relationship, their own position and norms of justice. International Review of Social Psychology, 30, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.98 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Šerek, J., Lacinova, L. & Macek, P. (2012). Does family experience influence political beliefs? Relation between interparental conflict perceptions and political efficacy in late adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.10.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Timmerman, M. E. & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zani, B. & Barrett, M. (2012). Engaged citizens? Political participation and social engagement among youth, women, minorities and migrants. Human Affairs, 22, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0023-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar