Skip to main content
Original Article

Relations of Personality Traits to Military Aviator Performance

It Depends on the Criterion

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000100

Abstract. Most research on cognitive and personality characteristics needed for effective military aircrew has focused on identifying measures that predict initial training outcomes (Carretta & Ree, 2003). While many of the same cognitive aptitudes predictive of military pilot training outcomes are likely to also predict on-the-job technical performance, the strict technical focus of training may make it difficult to fully evaluate the relations of personality to broader job performance criteria. This study evaluated the extent to which pre-accession personality measures were predictive of the stratification (i.e., ranking based on job performance) of early-career US Air Force aviators on Officer Performance Reports in assignments after initial training. Supervisor and senior rater stratifications of aviators on overall job performance were significantly related to pre-accession personality scores. For both pilots and navigators whose job performance was ranked, higher levels of Extraversion and Agreeableness were associated with more favorable supervisory performance rankings (uncorrected r values = .20–.28).

References

  • Barrick, M. R. & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H. & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. SchmidtW. C. BormanAssociatesEds., Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, J. S., Castaneda, M. & Pulos, S. (2010). Meta-analysis of personality assessments as predictors of military aviation training success. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 20, 92–109. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carretta, T. R. (2011). Pilot candidate selection method: Still an effective predictor of US Air Force pilot training performance. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 1, 3–8. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Carretta, T. R. & Ree, M. J. (2003). Pilot selection methods. In B. H. (Series Ed.) KantowitzP. S. TsangM. A. (Vol. Eds.) VidulichEds., Human factors in transportation: Principles and practices of aviation psychology (pp. 357–396). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carretta, T. R., Rodgers, M. N. & Hansen, I. (1993). The identification of ability requirements and selection instruments for fighter pilot training, AL-TP-1993–0016. Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate, Manpower and Personnel Research Division. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carretta, T. R., Teachout, M. S., Ree, M. J., Barto, E. L., King, R. E. & Michaels, C. F. (2014). Consistency of the relations of cognitive ability and personality traits to pilot training performance. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 24, 247–264. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dolgin, D. L. & Gibb, G. D. (1989). Personality assessment in aviator selection. In R. S. JensenEd., Aviation psychology (pp. 288–320). London, UK: Gower Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Drasgow, F., Nye, C. D., Carretta, T. R. & Ree, M. J. (2010). Factor structure of the Air Force Officer Qualifying Test form S: Analysis and comparison with previous forms. Military Psychology, 22, 68–85. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Edwards, M. R. & Ewen, A. J. (1996). 360° feedback: The powerful new model for employee assessment & performance improvement. New York, NY: American Management Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1978). Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures. Retrieved from http://uniformguidelines.com/uniformguidelines.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goeters, K. M., Maschke, P. & Eissfeldt, H. (2004). Ability requirements in core aviation professions: Job analysis of airline pilots and air traffic controllers. In K. M. GoetersEd., Aviation psychology: Practice and research (pp. 99–119). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goffin, R. D., Gellatly, I. R., Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N. & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Criterion validation of two approaches to performance appraisal: The behavioral observation scale and the relative percentile method. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11, 23–33. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers of the Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Held, J. D., Carretta, T. R. & Rumsey, M. G. (2014). Evaluation of tests of perceptual speed/ accuracy and spatial ability for use in military occupational classification. Military Psychology, 26, 199–220. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hunter, D. R. & Burke, E. F. (1994). Predicting aircraft pilot training success: A meta-analysis of published research. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 297–313. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hurtz, G. M. & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869–879. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality Research Form. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, D. N. (1985). Multidimensional aptitude battery. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • King, R. E., Barto, E., Ree, M. J. & Teachout, M. S. (2011). Compilation of pilot personality norms, AFRL-SA-WP-TR-2011-0008. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: School of Aerospace Medicine, Aeromedical Research Division. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • King, R. E., Retzlaff, P. D. & Orme, D. R. (2000). A comparison of US Air Force pilot psychological baseline information to safety outcomes, AFSC-TR-2001-0001. Kirtland AFB, NM: Policy Research, and Technology Division, Air Force Safety Center. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kubisiak, C. & Katz, L. (2006). U. S. Army aviator job analysis, Technical Report 1189. Arlington, VA: United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Rotary-Wing Aviator Research Unit. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Manley, G. G. (2011). Development of domain and facet level scales for the Self-Description Inventory, ALCAPS-TR-2011–0007. Randolph AFB, TX: Air Force Personnel Center, Strategic Research and Assessment Branch. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Martinussen, M. (1996). Psychological measures as predictors of pilot performance: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 1–20. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCarthy, J. M. & Goffin, R. D. (2001). Improving the validity of letters of recommendation: An investigation of three standardized reference forms. Military Psychology, 13, 199–222. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McHenry, J. J., Hough, L. M., Toquam, J., Hanson, M. A. & Ashworth, S. (1990). Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Personnel Psychology, 43, 335–354. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Millon, T. (1983). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Motowidlo, S. J. & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475–480. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Retzlaff, P. D. & Gilbertini, M. (1987). Air force pilot personality: Hard data on the “right stuff”. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 383–399. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Retzlaff, P. D., King, R. E. & Callister, J. D. (1995). USAF pilot training completion and retention: A ten year follow-up on psychological testing, AL/AO-TR-1995–0124. Brooks AFB, TX: Aerospace Medicine Directorate, Clinical Sciences Division, Neuropsychological Branch. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rotundo, M. & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. L., Dunn, W. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1995). Potential utility increases from adding new tests to the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB). TN-95-5. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Siem, F. M. & Murray, M. W. (1994). Personality factors affecting pilot combat performance: A preliminary investigation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, A45–A48. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N. & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • United States Air Force. (2015). Officer and enlisted evaluation systems. Air Force Instruction 36-2406. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of the Air Force. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • U. S. Department of Labor. (1999). Testing and assessment: An employer’s guide to good practices. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Woilfgeher, S. L. (2009). Inflation of USAF officer performance reports: Analyzing the organizational environment (Unpublished master’s thesis). Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar