Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Reactions to Somatic Stress Questionnaire (RSSQ)
Abstract
Abstract.Background: Stress is a ubiquitous phenomenon in modern societies and is often accompanied by somatic sensations and symptoms, such as tension and nausea. Despite the inherent somatic component of stress, research on coping with stress has previously neglected to consider how somatic stress responses (i.e., somatic stress) may affect stress-coping behavior. Aim: To address this gap in the literature, this study introduces the concept of reactions to somatic stress (RSS). It also provides the first psychometric evaluation of the Reactions to Somatic Stress Questionnaire (RSSQ), a novel 16-item questionnaire that assesses hampering and facilitating RSS. Method: The RSSQ and a battery of questionnaires on related constructs were administered via an online survey to N = 265 participants from the general population. Results: Exploratory (n = 133) and confirmatory (n = 132) factor analyses yielded two dimensions of the RSSQ: Hampering RSS (RSS-H) and facilitating RSS (RSS-F). Both subscales showed good internal consistency (α = .81–.89). Correlations with body awareness, emotion regulation skills, and beliefs about stress indicated medium to high convergent and discriminant validity. The RSS-H and RSS-F scores significantly predicted maladaptive and adaptive coping behavior, respectively. This association remained stable after controlling for subjective stress and related measures. Limitations: Generalization of the obtained results is limited to healthy individuals. Conclusion: The study supports the theoretical assumptions underlying the RSS concept. The RSSQ suggests a promising way to assess reactions to somatic stress as they relate to coping with stress. The RSSQ could be used for clinical and health psychological testing or interdisciplinary research.
References
2013). Good stress, bad stress and oxidative stress: Insights from anticipatory cortisol reactivity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(9), 1698–1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.004
(2020). The effect of Health Belief Model-based health education programme on coping with premenstrual syndrome: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 26(2), Article
(e12816 . https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.128162014). Improving your exploratory factor analysis for ordinal data: A demonstration using FACTOR. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(5), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.7275/dsep-4220
(2003). Measuring well-being rather than the absence of distress symptoms: A comparison of the SF-36 Mental Health subscale and the WHO-Five Well-Being Scale. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 12(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.145
(2008a). Emotionserleben und Emotionsregulation und ihr Zusammenhang mit psychischer Symptomatik
([Experience and validation of emotions and their link to psychomatic symptoms] . Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 58(09/10), 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-9863192008b). Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Emotionserleben und Emotionsregulation (EER)
([Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess emotion experience and regulation] . [Unpublished thesis]. Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck.2013). The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: Existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness, 4, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0110-9
(2008). Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur standardisierten Selbsteinschätzung Emotionaler Kompetenzen (SEK-27)
([Development and validation of the Emotion-Recognition Skill Questionnaire] . Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 56(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-4747.56.2.1412000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren
([Stress and coping in pairs] . Hogrefe.2020). Validation of the German version of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ). Mindfulness, 11, 2219–2234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01447-x
(2007). Teststatistische Prüfung und Normierung der deutschen Versionen des EUROHIS-QOL Lebensqualität-Index und des WHO-5 Wohlbefindens-Index
([Testing and standardization of the German version of the EUROHIS-QOL and WHO-S quality-of life-indices] . Diagnostica, 53(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.53.2.832006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
(2003). SF-36 Health Survey in rehabilitation research. Die Rehabilitation, 42(4), 218–225.
(2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(4), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466508X314891
(2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: A review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(5), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2008.0495
(2009). Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 5(7), 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2009.106
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
(2015). How do you feel? An interoceptive moment with your neurobiological self. Princeton University Press.
(2018). Being aware of the painful body: Validation of the German Body Awareness Questionnaire and Body Responsiveness Questionnaire in patients with chronic pain. PLoS One, 13(2), Article
(e0193000 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.01930001951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
(2020). Optimizing stress: An integrated intervention for regulating stress responses. Emotion, 20(1), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000670
(2005). The relationship of yoga, body awareness, and body responsiveness to self-objectification and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00183.x
(2019). Combining biofeedback with stress management interventions: A systematic review of physiological and psychological effects. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 44, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-018-09427-7
(1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39(1), 1–38.
(2013). What’s next for somatic symptom disorder? American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(12), 1393–1395. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13050589
(2012). Efficacy of abbreviated progressive muscle relaxation in a high-stress college sample. International Journal of Stress Management, 19(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027326
(2009). Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3(1), 1465–1858. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4
(1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
(2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed.). Sage.
(2001). Validation of the “Perceived Stress Questionnaire” (PSQ) in a German sample. Diagnostica, 47(3), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.142
(2005). The Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) reconsidered: Validation and reference values from different clinical and healthy adult samples. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000151491.80178.78
(2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol, 55, 745–774. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456
(2017). Relationship between traumatic life events, cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and somatic complaints. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 24, 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-017-9494-y
(2014). Prevalence and course of somatic symptoms in patients with stress-related exhaustion: Does sex or age matter. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-118
(2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00573-7
(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
(2020). IBM SPSS statistics for Macintosh (Version 26.0) [Computer software].
. (2013). Stress, distress, and bodytalk: Co-constructing formulations with patients who present with somatic symptoms. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 21(6), 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000008
(1996). Untersuchung mit einer deutschen Version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS)
([Investigations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)] . Diagnostica, 42(2), 139–156.2018). The Beliefs About Stress Scale (BASS): Development, reliability, and validity. International Journal of Stress Management, 25(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000047
(1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. Springer.
(2007). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12, 1–11.
(1993). Development of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: A new tool for psychosomatic research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 37(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(93)90120-5
(2010). In an unspoken voice: How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books.
(2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1401–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.010
(2011). SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand: Deutsche Version des Short Form-36 Health Survey
([The SF-36 health survey: German version of the Short Form Health Survey] . Hogrefe.2018). Trauma exposure and the mediating role of posttraumatic stress on somatic symptoms in civilian war victims. BMC Psychiatry, 18, Article
(92 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1680-42005). Stress and health: A positive direction. Stress & Health, 21(2), 73–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1053
(2015). Somatic experiencing: Using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma therapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 93–111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00093
(2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25(6), 551–603. https://doi.org/0160-7715/02/1200-0551/0
(2018). Interoceptive awareness skills for emotion regulation: Theory and approach of mindful awareness in body-oriented therapy (MABT). Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article
(798 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.007982007). Measuring dimensions of body connection: Body awareness and bodily dissociation. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 13(9), 945–953. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2007.0537
(2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
. (2006). Effects of a single session of large-group meditation and progressive muscle relaxation training on stress reduction, reactivity, and recovery. International Journal of Stress Management, 13(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.13.3.273
(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
(2020). Preoccupied with the body: Mild stress amplifies the relation between rumination and interoception. Cognition and Emotion, 34(7), 1382–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1746242
(2005). Stress and health: Psychological, behavioral, and biological determinants. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 607–628. https://doi.org/0.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144141
(1995).
(Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale . In J. WeinmanS. WrightM. JohnstenEds., Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio (pp. 35–37). NferNelson.1999). Assessment of perceived general self- efficacy on the Internet: Data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 12(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615809908248327
(2010). Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000001
(2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
(2007). Coping resources, coping processes, and mental health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3(1), 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091520
(2018). The traumatized body: Long-term PTSD and its implications for the orientation towards bodily signals. Psychiatry Research, 261, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.083
(2016). Unipark EFS software. Globalpark AG.
. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking Press.
(2014).
(Stress proliferation . In W. C. CockerhamR. DingwallS. R. QuahEds., The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society (pp. 2346–2348). John Wiley & Sons.1995). F-12: How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Health Institute.
(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
(2015).
(Stress, coping and health behavior . In K. GlanzB. K. RimerK. ViswanathEds., Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice (5th ed., pp. 223–242). Jossey-Bass.2017). Coping skills are associated with gastrointestinal symptom severity and somatization in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 15, 1565–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.02.032
(2018). Konfirmatorische Prüfung der Skalenstruktur des SF-12 Version 2.0 in einer deutschen bevölkerungs-repräsentativen Stichprobe
([Confirmatory analysis of the SF-12 version 2.0 scale structure in a representative German sample] . Diagnostica, 64(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a0001942019). Relationship between interoception and emotion regulation: New evidence from mixed methods. Journal of Affective Disorders, 246, 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.101
(