Explaining Moral Behavior
A Minimal Moral Model
Abstract
Abstract. In this review we make a simple theoretical argument which is that for theory development, computational modeling, and general frameworks for understanding moral psychology researchers should build on domain-general principles from reasoning, judgment, and decision-making research. Our approach is radical with respect to typical models that exist in moral psychology that tend to propose complex innate moral grammars and even evolutionarily guided moral principles. In support of our argument we show that by using a simple value-based decision model we can capture a range of core moral behaviors. Crucially, the argument we propose is that moral situations per se do not require anything specialized or different from other situations in which we have to make decisions, inferences, and judgments in order to figure out how to act.
References
2015). Causal conceptions in social explanation and moral evaluation. A historical tour. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 790–812. doi: 10.1177/1745691615601888
(2003). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 139–167. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.139
(2009). Dopamine modulates neural networks involved in effort-based decision-making. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 383–393. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.10.010
(2008). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108, 381–417. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001
(2007). Are morally motivated decision makers insensitive to the consequences of their choices? Psychological Science, 18, 24–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01843x
(2012). Administration and Coding Manual Socio-Moral Reasoning Aptitude Level Task (SoMoral). Montreal, QC: ABCs Laboratory.
(2013). A preliminary investigation of moral reasoning and empathy after traumatic brain injury in adolescents. Brain Injury, 27, 896–902. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.775486
(2016). The morality of action: The asymmetry between judgments of praise and blame in the action – omission effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.005
(2015). The effect of probability anchors on moral decision making. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. Pasadena, CA.
(1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 109–131. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545
(2013). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying value-based decision-making: From core values to economic value. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 398. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00398
(2011). Moral concepts set decision strategies to abstract values. PLoS One, 6, e18451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018451
(2003). Omission bias in vaccination decisions: Where’s the “omission”? Where’s the “bias”? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 186–202. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00057-8
(2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 216–235. doi: 10.1037/a0031021
(2014). Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 17320–17325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408988111
(2015). Dissociable effects of serotonin and dopamine on the valuation of harm in moral decision making. Current Biology, 25, 1852–1859. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.021
(2011). Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations. Cognitive Science, 35, 1052–1075. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01167
(2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 1082–1089. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834x
(2014). Relations between false belief understanding and executive function in early childhood: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 85, 1777–1794. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12237
(1996). The effect of decision strategy on deciding to defer choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9, 265–281. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199612)9:4<265::AID-BDM231>3.3.CO;2-W
(2009).
(Motivated moral reasoning . In D. L. MedinB. H. RossD. BartelsEds., Psychology of learning and motivation. Moral judgment and decision making (Vol. 50, pp. 307–338). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Textbooks.2008). Modulators of decision making. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 410–416.
(2005). Neurobiology of decision making: A selective review from a neurocognitive and clinical perspective. Biological Psychiatry, 58, 597–604. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.06.004
(2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22, 295–299. doi: 10.1177/0956797611398497x
(2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204–1209. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012
(2012). What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices. Cognition, 123, 434–441. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001
(2010). Nameless + harmless = blameless: When seemingly irrelevant factors influence judgment of (un)ethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111, 93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.001
(2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. doi: 10.1037/a0015141
(2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769
(2014). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason and the gap between us and them. New York, NY: Atlantic Books Ltd.
(2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 517–523. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02011-9
(2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004
(2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. doi: 10.1126/science.1062872
(2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
(2003). The emotional dog does learn new tricks: A reply to Pizarro and Bloom (2003). Psychological Review, 110, 197–198. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.197
(2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Vintage.
(2008). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. The Innate Mind, 3, 367–391.
(2016). Moral psychology: An exchange. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/04/07/moral-psychology-an-exchange/
(2016). Influence of the cortical midline structures on moral emotion and motivation in moral decision-making. Behavioural Brain Research, 302, 237–251. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.01.001
(2010). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. Journal of Bioeconomics, 12, 173–177.
(2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2000). Ideal code, real world: A rule-consequentialist theory of morality. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
(2015). A single counterexample leads to moral belief revision. Cognitive Science, 39, 1950–1964. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12223
(2013). Belief updating in moral dilemmas. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4, 705–714. doi: 10.1007/s13164-013-0159-y
(1739). A treatise of human nature. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2012). Moral kinematics: The role of physical factors in moral judgments. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1387–1401. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0217-1
(2015). The moral self: A review and integration of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, S104–S168. doi: 10.1002/job.1919
(2009). The neurobiology of decision: consensus and controversy. Neuron, 63, 733–745. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.003
(1997). Risk-sensitivity: Crossroads for theories of decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 304–309. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01093-0
(1981). The second year: The emergence of self-awareness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 263–291. doi: 10.2307/1914185
(1982). Variants of uncertainty. Cognition, 11, 143–157. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90023-3
(2007). Intricate ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2009). Will the real moral judgment please stand up? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12, 77–96. doi: 10.1007/s10677-008-9136-4
(2009). Bounded ethicality: The perils of loss framing. Psychological Science, 20, 378–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02296x
(2004). Development of “hot” executive function: The children’s gambling task. Brain and Cognition, 55, 148–157. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00275-6
(Knobe J.Nichols S.Eds. (2008). Experimental philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2000). Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36, 220–232. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.220
(1969).
(Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization . In D. A. GoslinEd., Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.1983).
(Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics . In J. A. MeachamEd., Contributions to human development, Vol. 10 (pp. 196–209). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.2015). Causal superseding. Cognition, 137. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.013
(2013). An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 527–539.
(1960). Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 28, 287–309. doi: 10.2307/1907722
(2014). Concrete and abstract ways to deontology: Cognitive capacity moderates construal level effects on moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.002
(2008). Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability. Cognition, 108, 754–770. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.009
(2009). Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer: Discrepantly fluent violations are deemed less morally wrong. Cognition, 112, 462–466. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.001
(2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. New York, NY: Crown.
(2009). The role of moral commitments in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 33, 273–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01013.x
(2016). The value of effort: How do we make decisions when effort is involved? (Unpublished thesis). London, UK: Queen Mary University of London.
(2007). Childhood and adolescent resiliency, regulation, and executive functioning in relation to adolescent problems and competence in a high-risk sample. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 541–563. doi: 10.1017/S0954579407070265
(2009). A reanalysis of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 577–580. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.002
(2007). Domain-general contributions to social reasoning: Theory of mind and deontic reasoning re-explored. Cognition, 102, 179–218. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.011
(2011). Elements of moral cognition. Rawls’ linguistic analogy and the cognitive science of moral and legal judgement. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Relations of moral reasoning and vicarious emotion to young children’s prosocial behavior toward peers and adults. Developmental Psychology, 32, 210–219. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.210
(2008). Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 19, 549–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02122.x
(1995). The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 715–726. doi: 10.1007/BF00872325
(1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
(2002). Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment. Cognition, 84, 221–236. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00048-3
(2015a). Moral judgments: Truth, order and Consequence. Psychology, 6, 633–642. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.65061
(2015b). Dynamic moral judgments and emotions. Psychology, 6, 922–931. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.68090
(2009). Dirty work, clean hands: The moral psychology of indirect agency. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 134–141. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.03.002
(1996). Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 145–171. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(96)00041-6
(1965). The moral judgment of the child (original 1932). New York, NY: Free Press.
(2012). Biases in children’s and adults’ moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.03.006
(1996). Moral and social reasoning and perspective taking in later life: A longitudinal study. Psychology and Aging, 11, 66–73. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.66
(1991). Decision-making over time and under uncertainty – A common approach. Management Science, 37, 770–786. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.37.7.770
(1981). Maximization theory in behavioral psychology. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 371–388. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00009407
(2010). Moral principles or consumer preferences? Alternative framings of the trolley problem. Cognitive Science, 34, 311–321. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01088.x
(2008). A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 9, 545–556. doi: 10.1038/nrn2357
(2014). Decisions, dopamine, and degeneracy in complex biological systems. Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, 11, 11–18. doi: 10.2147/nan.s32234
(1983).
(Morality . In P. H. MussenEd., Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 556–629). New York, NY: Wiley.2012). A model of reward- and effort-based optimal decision making and motor control. PLoS Computational Biology, 8, e1002716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002716
(1992). Status-quo and omission biases. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 46–61. doi: 10.1007/BF00208786
(1999). Protected values and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 79–94. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2839
(1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.
(2012). Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator’s group affiliation. Cognition, 124, 325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.004
(2012). Young children enforce social norms. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 232–236. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.004
(2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1096–1109. doi: 10.1177/0146167208317771
(2016). The psychologists take power. The New York Review of Books Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/02/25/the-psychologists-take-power/
(2010). Moral judgments recruit domain-general valuation mechanisms to integrate representations of probability and magnitude. Neuron, 67, 667–677. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.07.020
(1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245–255. doi: 10.1016/0148-2963(95)00155-7
(1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 76–105. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(91)90011-T
(2005).
(A framework for the psychology of norms . In P. CarruthersEd., The innate mind: Culture and cognition (pp. 280–301). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.2009). Using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to construct a measure of the magnitude of consequences component of moral intensity. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 391–407. doi: 0.1007/s10551-008-0006-8
(1992). Mental capacity constraints and the development of moral reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 251–287. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(92)90020-7
(1989). Doing away with personal injury law: New compensation mechanisms for victims, consumers, and business. New York, NY: Quorum Books.
(2011). Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 282–288. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr008
(in press).
(Reasoning and moral judgment: A common experimental toolbox . In L. J. BallV. A. ThompsonEds., International handbook of thinking and reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31–48. doi: 10.1037/h0026750
(1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and uncertainty, 5, 297–323. doi: 10.1007/BF00122574
(1995). Inaction inertia: Foregoing future benefits as a result of an initial failure to act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 793–803. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.793
(2011). Money or life: Behavioral and neural context effects on choice under uncertainty. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4, 25–36. doi: 10.1037/a0021241
(2014). Cognitive underpinnings of moral reasoning in adolescence: The contribution of executive functions. Journal of Moral Education, 44, 17–33. doi: 10.1080/03057240.2014.986077
(2016). All for one: Contributions of age, socioeconomic factor, executive functioning, and social cognition to moral reasoning in childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 227. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00227
(2012).
(Moral judgment . In K. J. HolyoakR. G. MorrisonEds., The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 364–389). Oxford, UK: Oxford Library of Psychology.2004).
(Gus in the gap: Bridging the judgment-action gap in moral functioning . In D. LapsleyD. NarvaezEds., Moral development, self and identity (pp. 1–20). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.1996). Influences upon managerial moral decision making: Nature of the harm and magnitude of consequences. Human Relations, 49, 1–22. doi: 10.1177/001872679604900101
(2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x
(under review). Intuitive expertise and irrelevant options.
(2012). Order effects in moral judgment. Philosophical Psychology, 25, 813–836. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2011.631995
(2014). Transfer effects between moral dilemmas: A causal model theory. Cognition, 131, 28–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.004
(
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Register for access
- Claim
-
Restore content access
This functionality works only for purchases made as a guest