The Surprisingly Limited Malleability of Implicit Racial Evaluations
Abstract
Implicit preferences for Whites compared to Blacks can be reduced via exposure to admired Black and disliked White individuals (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001). In four studies (total N = 4,628), while attempting to clarify the mechanism, we found that implicit preferences for Whites were weaker in the “positive Blacks” exposure condition compared to a control condition (weighted average d = .08). This effect was substantially smaller than the original demonstration (Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001; d = .82). Factors beyond exposure to admired Blacks may be necessary for the effect, such as making race accessible during exemplar exposure and including negative White exemplars. Our evidence suggests that exposure to known-group members shifts implicit race bias reliably, but weakly.
References
2009). The sorting paired features task: A measure of association strengths. Experimental Psychology, 56, 329–343.
(1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
(2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261.
(1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.
(2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642–658.
(2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800–814.
(2008). When social context matters: The influence of long-term contact and short-term exposure to admired outgroup members on implicit attitudes and behavioral intentions. Social Cognition, 26, 112–123.
(2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias: The role of motivations to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 835–848.
(2003). In the privacy of their own homes: Using the internet to access racial bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 273–284.
(2005). The power of a story: New, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 133–144.
(2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046.
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
(2009). Alienable speech: Ideological variations in the application of free-speech principles. Political Psychology, 30, 67–92.
(2001). Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 842–855.
(2003). Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 455–469.
(1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167–184.
(2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565–584.
(2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625–666.
(2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180.
(2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In , Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265–292). New York: Psychology Press.
(2008). The associations in our heads belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 553–594.
(2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88.
(2008). Implicit attitude generalization occurs immediately; explicit attitude generalization takes time. Psychological Science, 19, 249–254.
(2001). “Unlearning” automatic biases: The malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 856–868.
(2006). Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 995–1008.
(2007). Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 867–878
(1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
(1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309–316.
(2005). Social tuning of automatic attitudes: The role of affiliative motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 583–592.
(2005). Social psychological research and the Internet: The promise and peril of a new methodological frontier. In , In the social net: The social psychology of the Internet (pp. 1–25). New York: Cambridge University Press.
(2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 815–827.
(
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.- Personal login
- Register for access
- Claim
-
Restore content access
This functionality works only for purchases made as a guest