Does the world rock when the eyes roll?
Allocentric orientation representation, ocular counterroll, and the subjective visual vertical
Abstract
When the head is inclined sideways, the eyes are counter-rotated with respect to the head (ocular-counterroll, OCR). In man, the gain of OCR in static body tilts is limited to about 10% of the angle of roll tilt, which suggests that its function is vestigial. However, it is still unclear how the residual OCR is related to the perceived orientation of visual stimuli. Wade and Curthoys (1997) claim that the brain does not “take into account” the OCR, so that the eye position directly interferes with perception of visual orientation. Alternately, it has been argued that OCR is partly compensated by an extraretinal eye-position information such as, e.g., an efference copy (Haustein, 1992; Haustein & Mittelstaedt, 1990). The two experiments reported in this study are targeted towards critically examining this inter-relation between OCR and perceived visual orientation. The latter was assessed via the subjective visual vertical, SVV, which is determined when a subject judges the orientation of an indicator (e.g., a short line segment) as apparently vertical. The OCR was measured by using a video-oculographic system. In Experiment 1, a human centrifuge was used to test the effect of an increase of the gravito-inertial force (GIF) on SVV and OCR. Experiment 2 was inspired by the fact that OCR can also be elicited during “barbecue rotation”. Again, it was the aim to compare OCR and SVV in different body positions, such as pure roll and barbecue rotated tilts. The present study provides convincing experimental evidence that SVV is widely uninfluenced by the course of OCR. Increasing the GIF in Experiment 1 had a divergent effect on SVV and OCR; the gain of OCR increases whereas the SVV changed differently, at obtuse tilt angles even in the opposite direction. OCR and SVV were again found to dissociate in Experiment 2, which emphasizes the fact that the SVV and OCR are not controlled by the same neural mechanism, but rather use different spatial reference information.
References
(1995). Struktur und Bedeutung. Eine Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Bern: Huber.
(1974). Optic-vestibular orientation to the vertical. In: H. H. Kornhuber (Ed.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vestibular System, Part 2, (pp. 155-190). Heidelberg: Springer.
(1996). Subjective postural vertical inferred from vestibular-optokinetic vs. proprioceptive cues. Brain Research Bulletin, 40, 413– 415.
(1999). The vestibular cortex. Its locations, functions, and disorders. In B. Cohen and B. J. M. Hess (Eds.), Otolith function in spatial orientation and movement (pp. 293-312). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 871. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.
(1990). A novel automatic procedure for measuring ocular counterrolling: A computeranalytical method to determine the eye's roll angle while subjects work on perceptual tasks. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 433– 439.
(1992). An analysis of ocular counterrolling in response to body postions in three-dimensional space. Journal of Vestibular Research, 2, 213– 220.
(1975). Optically induced eye torsion. Albrecht v. Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 196, 1– 7.
(1991). Human ocular torsional position before and after unilateral vestibular neurectomy. Experimental Brain Research, 85, 218– 225.
(1996). The role of ocular torsion in visual measures of vestibular function. Brain Research Bulletin, 40, 399– 403.
(1989). A model of otolith stimulation. Biological Cybernetics, 60, 185– 194.
(1996). Saccular impact on ocular torsion. Brain Research Bulletin, 40, 321– 330.
(1983). Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function. Neurology, 3, 1460– 1469.
(1991). Prediction of space motion sickness susceptibility by disconjugate eye torsion in parabolic flight. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 62, 201– 205.
(1992). Wallenberg's syndrome: lateropulsion, cyclorotation, and subjective visual vertical in thirty-six patients. Annals of Neurology, 31, 399– 408.
(1992). Determinants of orientation in microgravity. Acta Astronautica, 27, 1– 9.
(1998). Three-dimensional modeling of static vestibulo-ocular brain stem syndromes. NeuroReport, 9, 3841– 3845.
(1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20– 25.
(1979). Eye torsion in response to a tilted visual stimulus. Vision Research, 19, 1177– 1179.
(1996). Determination of ocular torsion by means of automatic pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 43, 471– 479.
(1999). Three-dimensional eye movement recording for clinical application. Journal of Vestibular Research, 9, 157– 162.
(1990). Evaluation of retinal orientation and gaze direction in the perception of the vertical. Vision Research, 30, 255– 262.
(1992). Head-centric visual localization with lateral body tilt. Vision Research, 32, 669– 673.
(1998). Apparent body tilt and postual aftereffect. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 331– 347.
(1999). In B. Cohen and B. J. M. Hess (Eds.), Human ocular counterrolling during roll-tilt and centrifugation (pp. 173-180). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 871. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.
(1983). Do the eyes counterroll during barbecue rotation?. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, Vol. 9, 243– 243.
(1985). Dynamic ocular counterrolling: A comparison of responses to naso-occipital and barbecue rotations in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral vestibular sections. In M. Igarashi and F. O. Black (Eds.), Vestibular and Visual Control on Posture and Locomotor Equilibrium (pp.246-250). Basel: Karger.
(1996). Perceived body position and the visual horizontal. Brain Research Bulletin, 40, 393– 398.
(1992). Wahrnehmung der Vertikalen bei Variation von Stärke und Richtung des wirkenden Gravitationsfeldes. In: L. Montada (Ed.), Bericht über den 38. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Trier (pp. 261-262), vol 1. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(1996). The dynamic contributions of the otolith organs to human ocular torsion. Experimental Brain Research, 110, 110 315– 321.
(1983). A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical. Naturwissenschaften, 70, 272– 281.
(1988). The relative effect of saccular and somatosensory information on spatial perception and control. Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 42, 24– 30.
(1995). The formation of the visual and postural vertical. In T. Mergner & F. Hlavacka (Eds.), Multisensory control of posture (pp. 147-155). New York: Plenum Press.
(1996). Somatic Graviception. Biological Psychology, 42, 53– 74.
(1999). The role of the otoliths in perception of the vertical and in path integration. In B. Cohen & B. J. M. Hess (Eds.), Otolith function in spatial orientation and movement (pp. 334-344). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 871. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.
(1977). Listing's law, eye position sense, and the perception of the vertical. Vision Research, 17, 453– 457.
(1998). Sensory conflict theory and space sickness: our changing perspective. Journal of Vestibular Research, 8, 51– 56.
(1992). Vestibular-neck interaction of human ocular counterroll. Behavioral Brain Research, 48, 87– 90.
(1999). Orientation constancy in neurons of monkey visual cortex. Visual Cognition, 6, 43– 54.
(1964). On the role of gravity in human spatial orientation. Aerospace Medicine, 35, 764– 772.
(1978). The effect of preceding tilt on the perceived vertical. Hysteresis in perception of the vertical. Acta Otolaryngologica, 85, 68– 73.
(1967). Subjective vertical as as function of body position and gravity magnitude. Naturwissenschaften, 54, 288– 289.
(1997). The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli. Vision Research, 37, 1071– 1078.
(1959). Counterrolling of the eyes and its dependence on the magnitude of gravitational and inertial force acting laterally on the body. Journal of Applied Physiology, 14, 632– 634.
