Screening cardiovascular patients for aortic aneurysms (SCAN) – high prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in coronary heart disease patients requiring intervention
Abstract
Summary:Background: Since the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in Europe has declined to about 2.5%, general screening programs of elderly men are being called into question. On the other hand, other vascular diseases (e.g. coronary heart disease, CHD) are associated with a higher prevalence of AAA. This might have an impact on future targeted AAA screening programs. This study aimed to reevaluate the current prevalence of AAA in male patients with CHD, in order to assess whether CHD patients should be offered a targeted AAA ultrasound screening program. Patients and methods: The SCAN (Screening Cardiovascular Patients for Aortic Aneurysms) study prospectively evaluated the AAA prevalence in 1000 consecutive male CHD patients (70.1 ± 11.2 years) requiring any coronary intervention at an university hospital. All patients received transverse and longitudinal ultrasound scans of the abdominal aorta. Aortic diameter was assessed using the outer-to-outer measurement-technique. Primary endpoint was the prevalence of AAA. Secondary outcomes included stratification in 1-, 2-, or 3-vessel CHD. Results: AAA was detected in 85 patients (median diameter 38 mm, range 30–80 mm), corresponding to an overall prevalence of 8.5%. AAA prevalence was significantly associated with CHD severity: 5.6% in 1-vessel, 7.1% in 2-vessel, and 10.8% in 3-vessel CHD (P = 0.037). The multivariable analysis showed, that age per 10 years increase (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2–1.9, P = 0.001) and hyperlipidemia (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3–3.8, P = 0.003) were significantly associated with an AAA. The likelihood to be diagnosed with an AAA was significantly lower in non-smokers (OR 0.24, 95% CI, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study confirms that CHD requiring any type of coronary intervention is strongly associated with AAA in male patients. AAA prevalence increases with CHD severity. Since the AAA prevalence is still significantly higher than in the general population, targeted ultrasound screening should be considered for all CHD patients.
References
1 European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(1):8–93.
2 Kurzfassung S3-Leitlinie zu Screening, Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Bauchaortenaneurysmas. Gefässchirurgie. 2018;23:432–51.
3 . Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Online. 2007;(2):CD002945.
4 . Ultrasonographic screening for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2009;106(41):657–63.
5 . Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(5):741–51.
6 . Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation. 2011;124(10):1118–23.
7 . Lower prevalence than expected when screening 70-year-old men for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46(4):453–9.
8 . Prevalence and trends of the abdominal aortic aneurysms epidemic in general population – a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81260.
9 . Cost-effectiveness of the National Health Service abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme in England. BJS. 2014;101(8):976–82.
10 . Ultraschall-Screening auf abdominelle Aortenaneurysmen. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2016;141(14):1030–4.
11 . Decreasing prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm and changes in cardiovascular risk factors. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(3):651–8.
12 . Benefits and harms of screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Sweden: A registry-based cohort study. Lancet. 2018;391(10138):2441–7.
13 . The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm is consistently high among patients with coronary artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(1):232–40.e3.
14 . Introduction to statistical analysis. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1957.
15 . The saw-toothed behavior of power versus sample size and software solutions. Am Stat. 2002;56(2):149–55.
16 . The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;17(6):472–5.
17 . Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Br J Surg. 1995;82(8):1066–70.
18 . Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from a randomised population screening trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;23(1):55–60.
19 The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9345):1531–9.
20 Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ. 2004;329(7477):1259.
21 Initial results of ultrasound screening for aneurysm of the abdominal aorta in Western Australia: Relevance for endoluminal treatment of aneurysm disease. Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;9(3):234–40.
22 , Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A best-evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(3):203–11.
23 . Reproducibility of ultrasound measurement of the abdominal aorta. Br J Surg. 2011;98(11):1517–25.
24 High prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47(3):273–8.
25 Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(3):539–48.
26 A multicentre observational study of the outcomes of screening detected sub-aneurysmal aortic dilatation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45(2):128–34.
27 . Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(6):441.
28 The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: Validation cohort and final results. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(10):1425–30.
