Abstract
Zielsetzung: Untersuchung des Einflusses der wahrgenommenen Verfügbarkeit von Alkohol auf die Initiierung des Rauschtrinkens im Kindes- und Jugendalter Methodik: Es handelt sich um eine längsschnittliche Beobachtungsstudie mit drei Erhebungszeitpunkten über einen Zeitraum von 30 Monaten. Die Daten wurden an 1167 Schüler/innen mittels Fragebögen erhoben. Ergebnisse: Die Wahrscheinlichkeit für die Initiierung des Rauschtrinkens im Beobachtungszeitraum war bei Kindern und Jugendliche, die die Verfügbarkeit von Bier/Wein als hoch einschätzten, im Vergleich zu denen, die sie für gering erachteten, mit einem Chancenverhältnis (Adjustiertes Odds Ratio: AOR) von 1,54 (95 % Konfidenzintervall (KI): 1,14 – 2,09; p = 0,005) signifikant erhöht. Auch die wahrgenommene Verfügbarkeit von Spirituosen stellte sich als signifikanter Prädiktor heraus (AOR = 1,59; 95 % KI: 1,10 – 2,32; p = 0,014). Hier ergab sich weiterhin ein signifikanter Interaktionseffekt mit dem Alter der Kinder und Jugendlichen (AOR = 3,01; 95 % KI: 1,35 – 6,74; p = 0,007). Ein signifikanter Einfluss der wahrgenommenen Verfügbarkeit von Spirituosen konnte lediglich bei älteren Jugendlichen gefunden werden. Schlussfolgerungen: Neben politischen Maßnahmen zur Regulation der objektiven Verfügbarkeit von Alkohol (Mindestbezugsalter, Öffnungszeiten und Dichte von Verkaufsstellen) erscheint im Hinblick auf die subjektive Verfügbarkeit auch die Berücksichtigung des unmittelbaren sozialen Umfeldes für präventive Maßnahmen von Bedeutung zu sein.
Aims: To investigate the impact of the perceived availability of alcohol on the incidence rate of binge drinking among children and adolescents. Methods: A longitudinal observational study with three waves and a time interval of 30 months. Data from 1167 students were collected by self-administered questionnaires. Results: The perceived high availability of beer and wine was associated with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.54 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.14 – 2.09, p = .005) for initiating binge drinking compared with low perceived availability. The perceived availability of spirits was also found to be a significant predictor of initial binge drinking (AOR = 1.59; 95 % CI: 1.10 – 2.32, p = .014). Additionally, there was a significant interaction effect with the age of the students (AOR = 3.01; 95 % CI: 1.35 – 6.74, p = .007). The significant predictive effect of the perceived availability of spirits on initial binge drinking was found, however, only among older adolescents. Conclusion: While structural preventive measures focus on the objective availability of alcohol (legal age, opening hours, outlet density), with respect to the subjective availability of alcohol one should also consider the immediate social environment.
Literatur
1990). Subjective, social, and physical availability. I. Their interrelationships. The International Journal of the Addictions, 25, 889 – 910.
(1993). Physical, subjective, and social availability: their relationship to alcohol consumption in rural and urban areas. Addiction, 88, 489 – 499.
(2003). High school drinking and its consequences. Adolescence, 38, 567 – 579.
(2006). The burden of cancer attributable to alcohol drinking. International Journal of Cancer, 119, 884 – 887.
(2004). Health Consequences of Adolescent Alcohol Involvement. In R. Bonnie & M. E. OConnell (Eds.), Reducing Underage Drinking: A Collective Responsibility (pp. 383 – 401). Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
(2014). Der Alkoholkonsum Jugendlicher und junger Erwachsener in Deutschland 2012. Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Repräsentativbefragung und Trends. Köln: Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung.
(2002). The effects of price on alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems. Alcohol Research & Health, 26, 22 – 34.
(2010). Community alcohol outlet density and underage drinking. Addiction, 105, 270 – 278.
(2001). Age at onset of alcohol use and DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: a 12-year follow-up. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 493 – 504.
(2001). Adolescent drinking and alcohol policy. Contemporary Drug Problems, 28, 87 – 131.
(2000). The relative importance of social versus commercial sources in youth access to tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs. Preventive Medicine, 31 (1), 39 – 48.
(2007). Who needs liquor stores when parents will do? The importance of social sources of alcohol among young urban teens. Preventive Medicine, 44, 471 – 476.
(2000). Age of drinking onset and unintentional injury involvement after drinking. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 1527 – 1533.
(2002). Age of drinking onset, driving after drinking, and involvement in alcohol related motor-vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34, 85 – 92.
(2013). Neurotoxic effects of alcohol in adolescence. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 703 – 721.
(2009). Schutz- und Risikofaktoren. In R. Thomasius, M. Schulte-Markwort, U. J. Küstner & P. Riedesser (Hrsg.), Suchtstörungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter (pp. 127 – 138). Stuttgart: Schattauer.
(2002). Pisa 2000: Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institiut für Bildungsforschung.
(2008). Alcohol outlet density, perceived availability and adolescent alcohol use: a multilevel structural equation model. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 811 – 816.
(2011). Adult consequences of late adolescent alcohol consumption: a systematic review of cohort studies. PLoS Medicine, 8, e1000413.
(2001). Origins and consequences of age at first drink. I. Associations with substance-use disorders, disinhibitory behavior and psychopathology, and P3 amplitude. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25, 1156 – 1165.
(2005). Adolescence: booze, brains, and behavior. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 207 – 220.
(2005). Mortality and population drinking: a review of the literature. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24, 537 – 547.
(2009). Hours and days of sale and density of alcohol outlets: impacts on alcohol consumption and damage: a systematic review. Alcohol Alcohol, 44, 500 – 516.
(2009). Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet, 373, 2223 – 2233.
(2012). Veränderungen im Tabak-, Alkohol- und Cannabiskonsum von Jugendlichen im Zeitraum von 2002 bis 2010 in Deutschland. Gesundheitswesen, 74 (Suppl. 1), 542 – 548.
(1993). A sensation seeking scale for children: Further refinement and psychometric development. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 15, 69 – 85.
(2000). Evidence of a structural effect for alcohol outlet density: a multilevel analysis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 188 – 195.
(1980). Availability and the Prevention of Alcohol-Related Problems. In T. C. Harford, L. Parker-Langley & L. Light (Eds.), Normative Approaches to the Prevention of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA Research Monograph No. 3, pp. 123 – 146). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
(2011). Physical, social, and perceived availabilities of alcohol and last month alcohol use in rural and small urban communities. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 40, 1203 – 1214.
(2009). Rauschtrinken im Kindes- und Jugendalter: Epidemiologie, Auswirkungen und Intervention. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 106 (19), 323 – 328.
(2007). Gender, early alcohol use, and suicide ideation and attempts: findings from the 2005 youth risk behavior survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 175 – 181.
(2004). Alcohol and the adolescent brain: Human studies. Alcohol Research & Health, 28, 205 – 212.
(2009). Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: a meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. Addiction, 104, 179 – 190.
(2002). Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000. Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Supplement 14), 206 – 225.
(2014). Global status report on alcohol 2014. Geneva: Autor.
(