Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Originalartikel

Prozessbezogene Diagnostik von Lesefähigkeiten bei Grundschulkindern

Published Online:October 16, 2012https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000079

Abstract

Aus kognitionspsychologischer Perspektive beruhen Lesefähigkeiten auf der effizienten Bewältigung von Teilprozessen des Leseverstehens auf Wort-, Satz- und Textebene. In diesem Beitrag stellen wir mit ProDi-L ein neuartiges computergestütztes Diagnostikum vor, das durch die kombinierte Erfassung von Antwortrichtigkeit und Reaktionszeit als Indikatoren für die Zuverlässigkeit und Effizienz einzelner Teilprozesse eine differenzierte prozessbezogene Diagnostik des Leseverstehens bei Grundschulkindern ermöglichen soll. Mittels sechs Subtests sollen zusammenhängende, aber psychometrisch klar trennbare Teilfähigkeiten des Leseverstehens erfasst werden. In einer Querschnittsuntersuchung an 536 Kindern der Klassenstufen 1–4 konnten dieser Annahme entsprechend Belege für die faktorielle Validität von ProDi-L erbracht werden. Die Zusammenhänge der Testwerte von ProDi-L mit kriterialen Lesefähigkeitsmaßen (gemessen mit ELFE 1–6), Lehrerurteilen und sprachfreien Intelligenzmaßen (diskriminante Validität) sprechen außerdem für die Konstrukt- und Kriteriumsvalidität des Instruments.


Process-oriented Assessment of Reading Skills in Primary School Children

From a cognitive perspective, reading skills depend on efficient component processes of reading comprehension on the word, sentence and text level. In this article, we present the novel computer-based instrument ProDi-L, which uses both accuracy and reaction time as indicators of reliability and efficiency of each component process, thereby allowing for a differentiated and process-oriented assessment of reading comprehension in primary school children. Six subtests were developed to assess related but psychometrically clearly distinguishable component processes. In line with this assumption, a cross-sectional study with 536 children of grades 1–4 confirmed the factorial validity of ProDi-L. Correlations of ProDi-L scores with external measures of reading comprehension (assessed with ELFE 1–6), teacher ratings, and non-verbal intelligence scores also confirmed construct, convergent, and discriminant validity.

Literatur

  • Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent?. Memory and Cognition , 10, 565– 575. doi:10.3758/BF03202439 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 15, 802– 814. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baayen, R. H. , Piepenbrock, R. , Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database , [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia. PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Balota, D. A. , Cortese, M. J. , Sergent-Marshall, S. D. , Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 133, 283– 316. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. , Weiß, R. H. , Osterland, J. (1997). Grundintelligenztest Skala 1 (5., überarb. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. , Cohen, P. , West, S. G. , Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Coltheart, M. , Rastle, K. , Perry, C. , Langdon, R. , Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review , 108, 204– 256. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cunningham, A. E. , Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children. Journal of Educational Psychology , 82, 733– 740. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.733 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deno, S. L. , Mirkin, P. , Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children , 49, 36– 45. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), . Attention and performance, Vol. 12 (pp. 559–586). Hove, UK: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Frisson, S. , Rayner, K. , Pickering, M. J. (2005). Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 31, 862– 877. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.862 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frith, U. (1986). A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia , 36, 69– 81. doi:10.1007/BF02648022 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frith, U. , Wimmer, H. , Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading , 2, 31– 54. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0201_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Garrod, S. C. , Sanford, A. J. (1990). Referential processes in reading: Focusing on roles and individuals. In G.B. Flores d’Arcais, K. Rayner & D. Balota (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 515–533). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gernsbacher, M. A. , Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 17, 245– 262. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.2.245 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition , 68, 1– 76. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gough, P. B. , Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education , 7, 6– 10. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Graesser, A. C. , Hoffman, N. L. , Clark, L. F. (1980). Structural components of reading time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 19, 135– 151. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hale, A. D. , Henning, J. B. , Hawkins, R. O. , Sheeley, W. , Shoemaker, L. , Reynolds, J. R. et al. (2011). Reading assessment methods for middle-school students: An investigation of reading comprehension rate and Maze accurate response rate. Psychology in the Schools , 48, 28– 36. doi:10.1002/pits.20544 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hannon, B. , Daneman, B. (2004). Shallow semantic processing of text: An individual-differences account. Discourse Processes , 37, 187– 204. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3703_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hau, K. T. , Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes.. British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology , 57, 327– 351. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2004.tb00142.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haviland, S. E. , Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process of comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 13, 512– 521. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics , 6, 65– 70. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. , McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research , 18, 117– 144. doi: 10.1080/03610739208253916 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hornberg, S. , Valtin, R. , Potthoff, B. , Schwippert, K. , Schulz-Zander, R. (2007). Lesekompetenzen von Mädchen und Jungen im internationalen Vergleich. In W. Bos, S. Hornberg, K.-H. Arnold, G. Faust, L. Fried, E.-M. Lankes, K. Schwippert & R. Valtin (Hrsg.), . IGLU 2006: Lesekompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich , (S. 195–224). Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Huntsman, L. A. , Lima, S. D. (2002). Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research , 31, 289– 306. doi:10.1023/A:1015544213366 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jensen, A. R. (1993). Why is reaction time correlated with psychometric g?. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 2, 53– 56. DOI: 10.1111/1467–8721.ep10770697 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Amsterdam: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jensen, A. R. , Larson, J. , Paul, S. M. (1988). Psychometric g and mental processing speed on a semantic verification test. Personality and Individual Differences , 9, 243– 255. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G. , Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide . Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Karing, C. , Matthäi, J. , Artelt, C. (2011). Genauigkeit von Lehrerurteilen über die Lesekompetenz ihrer Schülerinnen und Schüler in der Sekundarstufe I – Eine Frage der Spezifität?. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie , 25, 159– 170. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000041 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Kintsch, W. , Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology , 5, 257– 274. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90036-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Küspert, P. , Schneider, W. (1998). Würzburger Leise Leseprobe . Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lehrl, S. , Fischer, B. (1988). The basic parameters of human information processing: Their role in the determination of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences , 9, 883– 896. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lenhard, W. , Schneider, W. (2006). ELFE 1–6: Ein Leseverständnistest für Erst- bis Sechstklässer . Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lenhard, W. , Schneider, W. (Hrsg.) (2009). Diagnostik und Förderung des Leseverständnisses . Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lorenz, C. , Artelt, C. (2009). Fachspezifität und Stabilität diagnostischer Kompetenz von Grundschullehrkräften in den Fächern Deutsch und Mathematik. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie , 23, 211– 222. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.23.34.211 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Mayring, H. , Wimmer, H. (2003). Salzburger Lese-Screening für die Klassenstufen 1–4 . Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McRae, K. , Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. , Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language , 38, 283– 312. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2543 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Murray, J. D. , Burke, K. A. (2003). Activation and encoding of predictive inferences: The role of reading skill.. Discourse Processes , 35, 81– 102. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3502_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Müller, B. , Richter, T. , Križan, A. , Hecht, T. , Ennemoser, M. (2012). Evidenzbasierte Leseförderung: Vorstellung einer Interventionsstudie. Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung , 7, 213– 220. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. , Muthén, B. O. (1998–2006). MPlus user’s guide , (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nation, K. , Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties.. Journal of Memory and Language , 39, 85– 101. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2564 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Naumann, J. , Artelt, C. , Schneider, W. , Stanat, P. (2010). Lesekompetenz von PISA 2000 bis PISA 2009. In E. Klieme, C. Artelt, J. Hartig, N. Jude, O. Köller, M. Prenzel, W. Schneider & P. Stanat (Hrsg.).. PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt , (S. 23–71). Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Naumann, J. , Richter, T. , Christmann, U. , Groeben, N. (2008). Working memory capacity and reading skill moderate the effectiveness of strategy training in learning from hypertext. Learning and Individual Differences , 18, 197– 213. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Naumann, J. , Richter, T. , Flender, J. , Christmann, U. , Groeben, N. (2007). Signaling in expository hypertexts compensates for deficits in reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology , 99, 791– 807. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.791 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Newell, A. , Rosenbloom, P. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J.R. Anderson (Ed), Cognitive skills and their acquisition , (pp. 1–55) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oakhill, J. V. , Cain, K. , Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes , 18, 443– 468. doi:10.1080/01690960344000008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paap, K. R. , Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research , 53, 13– 24. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability . New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language , (pp. 167–208). Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perfetti, C. A. , Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro & P. Reitsma (Eds.), . Precursors of functional literacy , (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pickering, M. J. , Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? . Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 11, 105– 110. doi:0.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pickering, M. J. , van Gompel, R. P. G. (2006). Syntactic parsing. In M. J. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), . Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 455–503). London: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Projekt Deutscher Wortschatz (2007). Deutscher Wortschatz – Portal , [Internet-Datenbank]. Verfügbar unter corpora.uni-leipzig.de/ (Zugriff am 20.09.2011) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers.. Psychological Bulletin , 114, 510– 532. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Richter, T. , Christmann, U. (2009). Lesekompetenz: Prozessebenen und interindividuelle Unterschiede. In N. Groeben & B. Hurrelmann (Hrsg.), Lesekompetenz: Bedingungen, Dimensionen, Funktionen (3. Aufl., S. 25–58). Weinheim: Juventa. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Richter, T. , Naumann, J. (2009). Was misst der ELVES-Subtest Satzverifikation? Analysen von Mess- und Itemeigenschaften mit hierarchisch-linearen Modellen. In W. Schneider, H. Marx & W. Lenhard (Hrsg.), . Diagnose und Förderung des Leseverständnisses , (Tests und Trends, N. F. Bd. 7, S. 131–150). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Richter, T. , van Holt, N. (2005). ELVES: Ein computergestütztes Diagnostikum zur Erfassung der Effizienz von Teilprozessen des Leseverstehens. Diagnostica , 51, 169– 182. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.169 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Richter, T. , Schroeder, S. , Wöhrmann, B. (2009). You don’t have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 96, 538– 558. doi:10.1037/a0014038 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points.. Cognitive Psychology , 7, 532– 547. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Roskam, E. E. (1997). Models for speed and time-limited tests. In W. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Hrsg.), . Handbook of modern item response theory , (S. 187–208). New York: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rost, D. H. (1989). Reading comprehension: Skill or skills?. Journal of Research in Reading , 12, 87– 113. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1989.tb00160.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rost, D. H. , Hartmann, A. (1992). Lesen, Hören, Verstehen.. Zeitschrift für Psychologie , 200, 345– 361. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Roth, E. (1964). Die Geschwindigkeit der Verarbeitung von Information und ihr Zusammenhang mit Intelligenz. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie , 11, 616– 622. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sanders, T. J. M. , Spooren, W. P. M. , Noordman, L. G. M. (1992). Towards a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes , 15, 1– 35. doi:10.1080/01638539209544800 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schneider, W. , Schlagmüller, M. , Ennemoser, M. (2007). LGVT 6–12: Lesegeschwindigkeits- und verständnistest für die Klassen 6–12 . Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schroeder, S. (2011). What readers have and do: Effects of students’ verbal ability and reading time on comprehension with and without text availability. Journal of Educational Psychology , 103, 877– 896. doi: 10.1037/a0023731 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Singer, M. (1993). Causal bridging inferences: Validating consistent and inconsistent sequences. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology , 47, 340– 359. doi:10.1037/h0078825 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Spearman, C. E. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement . New York: Macmillan.. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly , 16, 32– 71. doi:10.2307/747348 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological core variable difference model.. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 21, 590– 604. doi:10.1177/002221948802101003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sticht, T. G. , James, J. H. (1984). Listening and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), . Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 293–317). White Plains, NY: Longman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Südkamp, A. , Kaiser, J. , Möller, J. (2012, March 26). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology . Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0027627 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson-Schill, S. L. , Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1999). Priming of visual and functional knowledge on a semantic classification task.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, , 25, 41– 53. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.41 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ulrich, R. , Miller, J. (1993). Information processing models generating lognormally distributed reaction times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology , 37, 513– 525. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Dijk, T. A. , Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension . New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vellutino, F. R. , Fletcher, J. M. , Snowling, M. J. , Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 45, 2– 40. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Venezky, R. (1979). Orthographic regularities in English words. In P. Kolers, M. Wolstrad & P. Bouma (Eds.), . Processing of visual language , (pp. 283–293). New York: Plenum Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Weiß, R. H. (2008). Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 Revision (CFT20-R) . Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • West, S. G. , Finch, J. F. , Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation modeling with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), . Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications , (pp. 37–55). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H. (1996). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from children learning to read German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 61, 80– 90. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wirtz, M. , Caspar, F. (2002). Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität . Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zwaan, R. A. , Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin , 123, 162– 185. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.123.2.162 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar