Suppressed, but Not Forgotten
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of thought suppression over a 1-week interval. In two experiments with 80 university students each, we used the think/no-think paradigm in which participants initially learn a list of word pairs (cue-target associations). Then they were presented with some of the cue words again and should either respond with the target word or avoid thinking about it. In the final test phase, their memory for the initially learned cue-target pairs was tested. In Experiment 1, type of memory test was manipulated (i.e., direct vs. indirect). In Experiment 2, type of no-think instructions was manipulated (i.e., suppress vs. substitute). Overall, our results showed poorer memory for no-think and control items compared to think items across all experiments and conditions. Critically, however, more no-think than control items were remembered after the 1-week interval in the direct, but not in the indirect test (Experiment 1) and with thought suppression, but not thought substitution instructions (Experiment 2). We suggest that during thought suppression a brief reactivation of the learned association may lead to reconsolidation of the memory trace and hence to better retrieval of suppressed than control items in the long term.
References
1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.
(2001). Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control. Nature, 410, 366–369.
(2004). Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science, 303, 232–235.
(2007). ERP evidence for successful voluntary avoidance of conscious recollection. Brain Research, 1151, 119–133.
(2006). Failures to find suppression of episodic memories in the think/no-think paradigm. Memory and Cognition, 34, 1569–1577.
(2007). Sleep’s function in the spontaneous recovery and consolidation of memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 169–183.
(2006). Reconsolidation: The advantage of being refocused. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 174–178.
(2006). The secret life of memories. Neuron, 50, 350–352.
(2007). Reconsolidation of declarative memory in humans. Learning and Memory, 14, 295–303.
(2005). Intentional forgetting benefits from thought substitution. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 484–489.
(2003). Depressive deficits in forgetting. Psychological Science, 14, 573–578.
(2001). Gone but not forgotten: The transient nature of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 12, 148–152.
(1999). On recollections lost: When practice makes imperfect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 463–473.
(2009). ERP correlates of intentional forgetting. Brain Research, 1255, 132–147.
(2000). Low reliability in perceptual priming: Consequences for the interpretation of functional dissociations between explicit and implicit memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 211–233.
(1998). Cognitive neuroscience and the study of memory. Neuron, 20, 445–468.
(2009). A single standard for memory: The case for reconsolidation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 224–234.
(2000). The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 504–511.
(1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.
(