When the Others Matter
Context-Dependent Effects on Changes in Appreciation of Innovativeness
Abstract
Although innovativeness is an important variable in product design, we know little about its appreciation. We studied how appreciation of innovativeness and its dynamics depends on the heterogeneity of the context in which it appears. We employed a test-retest design in which appreciation of car interior designs was tested before and after repeated evaluations. We tested heterogeneous stimulus sets (highly and lowly innovative designs together; Experiment 1) and homogeneous stimulus sets (highly or lowly innovative designs; Experiment 2). The known effect (Carbon, Hutzler, & Minge, 2006; Carbon & Leder, 2005) of a selective increase in attractiveness ratings for highly innovative stimuli after repeated evaluations was only obtained for heterogeneous sets. In homogeneous sets, both highly and lowly innovative interiors were rated similarly and showed similar dynamics. Experiment 3 was a shorter version of Experiment 1, which ruled out differences in experimental design (more ratings and longer duration in Experiment 1) as the cause of the differences. High innovativeness was found to show a specific increase in attractiveness ratings only when innovativeness was made apparent by presenting stimuli in heterogeneous sets. Thus, awareness of variation in innovativeness as a relevant stimulus dimension is a key feature regarding its effect on appreciation.
References
(1970a). Esthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
(1970b). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 279–286.
(1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional account. Social Cognition, 12, 103–128.
(1990). Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 791–800. doi: 10.1037/ 0022-3514.58.5.791
(1990). Is there no MMN in the visual modality? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 234–234.
(2010). The cycle of preference: Long-term dynamics of esthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica, 134, 233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.004
(2010). Dissociation of facial attractiveness and distinctiveness processing in congenital prosopagnosia. Visual Cognition, 18, 641–654. doi: 10.1080/13506280903462471
(2006). Innovativeness in design investigated by eye movements and pupillometry. Psychology Science, 48, 173–186.
(2005). The repeated evaluation technique (RET): A method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 587–601. doi: 10.1002/acp.1098
(2008). Design evaluation by combination of repeated evaluation technique and measurement of electrodermal activity. Research in Engineering Design, 19, 143–149. doi: 10.1007/s00163-008-0045-2
(2006). Evaluating design perception of 36 car interiors. Unpublished research report, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271.
(2001). Winning at new products. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
(2005). The Cox review of creativity in business, HM Treasury. Retrieved from www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/coxreview_index.htm
(2000). The electrodermal system. In , Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 200–222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 170–177. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.170
(2010). Priming semantic concepts affects the dynamics of esthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica, 135, 191–200. doi: 10.1016/ j.actpsy.2010.06.006
(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
(2006). The generality and ultimate origins of the attractiveness of prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 166–183. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_5
(2003). It’s not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(1), 149–156.
(2008). Product esthetics. In , Product experience (pp. 259–286). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
(2003). Most advanced, yet acceptable: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of esthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 111–124. doi: 10.1348/000712603762842147
(1948). Adaption level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference. Psychological Review, 55, 297–313.
(2005). Art and cognition! Consequences for experimental esthetics. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 5, 11–20.
(2004). A model of esthetic appreciation and esthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508. doi: 10.1348/0007126042369811
(2005). Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 603–618. doi: 10.1002/acp.1088
(2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1255–1266. doi: 10.1177/01461672012710002
(2003). Engineering esthetics and esthetic ergonomics: Theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology. Ergonomics, 46, 1273–1292. doi: 10.1080/ 00140130310001610829
(2002). Accounting for innovativeness and measuring innovativeness: An illustrative framework and an application. American Economic Review, 92, 226–230. doi: 10.1257/000282802320189302
(2000). Styling strategy. Business Horizons, 43, 45–52. doi: 10.1016/S0007-6813(00)80008-7
(1981). Boredom: Practical consequences and a theory. Acta Psychologica, 49, 53–82. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(81)90033-0
(1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2004). Processing fluency and esthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364–382. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
(2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558–566. doi: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1465.x
(2005). Novel stimuli are negative stimuli: Evidence that negative affect is reduced in the mere exposure effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 365–372. doi: 10.2466/PMS.100.2.365
(1978). Principles of categorization. In , Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, 93–105. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.54.2.93
(2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25, 638–656. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638
(2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53–117. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36002-8
(1974). Methodological factors in mere exposure research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1014–1025. doi: 10.1037/ h0037419
(1993). Absolute pitch. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 345–361. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.345
(1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by preattentive sensory memory. Nature, 372, 90–92. doi:10.1038/372090a0
(2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 10, 224–228. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00154
