Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Short Research Note

Men’s Social Status and Attractiveness

Women’s Receptivity to Men’s Date Requests

Published Online:June 19, 2012https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000083

Abstract

Research has found that, for long-term dating, women value men with greater financial resources and higher status, while for short-term dating they value men with greater physical attractiveness. However, there are discrepant results for both long- and short-term dating. As most of the previous studies used only questionnaires, we conducted a field experiment to evaluate women’s receptivity to men’s date requests. Young male confederates who ostensibly had high, middle, or low incomes, depending on the experimental condition, asked young women walking down the street for their phone number. We found that men’s financial resources were positively associated with compliance with their request. Evolutionary theory proposing that women select men with greater resources for them and their offspring is used to explain the results.

References

  • Amador, J., Charles, T., Tait, J., Helm, H. W. (2005). Sex and generational differences in desired characteristics in mate selection. Psychological Reports, 96, 19–25. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1074 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bozon, M., Héran, F. (2006). La formation du couple [Couple forming]. Paris, France: La Découverte. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49. doi 10.1017/S0140525X00023992 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278. doi 10.1111/1475-6811.00018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guéguen, N. (2007). The effect of a man’s touch on woman’s compliance to a request in a courtship context. Social Influence, 2, 81–97. doi 10.1080/15534510701316177 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Guéguen, N. (2011). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers: A field study testing the impact of the attractiveness of the solicitor. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 915–919. doi 10.1007/s10508-011-9750-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951–969. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.951 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Li, N. P., Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether and why. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 90, 468–489. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 947–955. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mermet, G. (2010). Francoscopie. Paris: Larousse. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 447–458. doi 10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sprecher, S., Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463–481. doi 10.1177/0265407502019004048 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Kathleen, D., Vohs, K. D., Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 664–680. doi 10.1037/a0021669.664 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. G. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vigil, J. M., Geary, D. C., Byrd-Craven, J. (2006). Trade-offs in low income women’s preferences for long-term and short-term mates: Within-sex differences in reproductive strategy. Human Nature, 17, 319–336. doi 10.1007/s12110-006-1012-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar