Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation
Previous article
Short Research Note

Mapping Emotion Terms into Affective Space

Further Evidence for a Four-Dimensional Structure

Published Online:June 20, 2016https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000180

Abstract

Abstract. Recent empirical work on the semantics of emotion terms across many different cultures and languages, using a theoretical componential approach, suggested that four dimensions are needed to parsimoniously describe the semantic space of the emotion domain as reflected in emotion terms (Fontaine, Scherer, Roesch, & Ellsworth, 2007; Fontaine, Scherer, & Soriano, 2013). In addition to valence, power, and arousal, a novelty dimension was discovered that mostly differentiated surprise from other emotions. Here, we further explore the existence and nature of the fourth dimension in semantic emotion space using a much larger and much more representative set of emotion terms. A group of 156 participants each rated 10 out of a set of 80 French emotion terms with respect to semantic meaning. The meaning of an emotion term was evaluated with respect to 68 emotion features representing the appraisal, action tendency, bodily reaction, expression, and feeling components of the emotion process. A principal component analysis confirmed the four-dimensional valence, power, arousal, and novelty structure. Moreover, this larger and much more representative set of emotion terms revealed that the novelty dimension not only differentiates surprise terms from other emotion terms, but also identifies substantial variation within the fear and joy emotion families.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ellsworth, P. C. (2013). Appraisal theory: Old and new questions. Emotion Review, 5, 125–131. doi 10.1177/1754073912463617 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fontaine, J. R. J., Poortinga, Y. H., Setiadi, B., & Markam, S. S. (2002). Cognitive structure of emotion terms in Indonesia and The Netherlands. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 61–86. doi 10.1080/ 02699933014000130 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B., & Ellsworth, P. (2007). The world of emotion is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science, 18, 1050–1057. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Soriano, C. (Eds.). (2013). Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fontaine, J. R. J., Veirman, E., Groenvynck, H., & Scherer, K. R. (2013). From meaning to experience: The dimensional structure of emotional experiences. In J. R. J. FontaineK. R. SchererC. SorianoEds., Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 243–260). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jakubicek, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovar, V., Rychly, P., & Suchomel, V. (2013, July). The TenTen Corpus Family. Paper presented at the 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference, Lancaster, UK. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P., & Tugwell, D. (2004). The sketch engine. In G. WilliamsS. VessierEds., Proceedings of the Eleventh Euralex International Congress (Vol. 1, pp. 105–116). Lorient, France: Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines, Université de Bretagne Sud. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.itri.bton.ac.uk/ reports/ITRI-04-08.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Larsen, J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. ClarkEd., Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 25–29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2, 57–64. doi 10.1027/1614-1881.2.2.57 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE [A lexical database of contemporary French on the Internet: LEXIQUE]. L’Année Psychologique, 101, 447–462. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Niedenthal, P., Auxiette, C., Nugier, A., Dalle, N., Bonin, P., & Fayol, M. (2004). A prototype analysis of the French category “emotion”. Cognition & Emotion, 18, 289–312. doi 10.1080/ 02699930341000086 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Patil, V. H., Singh, S. N., Mishra, S., & Donavan, D. T. (2007). Parallel analysis engine to aid determining number of factors to retain [Computer software]. Available from http://smishra.faculty.ku.edu/parallelengine.htm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Patil, V. H., Singh, S. N., Mishra, S., & Donavan, D. T. (2008). Efficient theory development and factor retention criteria: Abandon the “eigenvalue greater than one” criterion. Journal of Business Research, 61, 162–170. doi 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reips, U.-D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256. doi 10.1027//1618-3169.49.4.243 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178. doi 10.1037/h0077714 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Russell, J. A. (1991). Culture and the categorization of emotions. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 426–450. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.426 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Russell, J. A., Lewicka, M., & Niit, T. (1989). A cross-cultural study of a circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 848–856. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1996). The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. In J. S. WigginsEd., The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 21–50). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. SchererP. EkmanEds., Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. (2001). The nature and study of appraisal: A review of the issues. In K. R. SchererA. SchorrT. JohnstoneEds., Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 369–391). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. (2004). Which emotions can be induced by music? What are the underlying mechanisms? And how can we measure them? Journal of New Music Research, 33, 239–251. doi 10.1080/0929821042000317822 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44, 695–729. doi 10.1177/0539018405058216 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. (2009). Emotions are emergent processes: They require a dynamic computational architecture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3459–3474. doi 10.1098/rstb.2009.0141 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Soriano, C. (2013). CoreGRID and MiniGRID: Development and validation of two short versions of the GRID instrument. In J. R. J. FontaineK. R. SchererC. SorianoEds., Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 523–541). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schlosberg, H. (1952). The description of facial expressions in terms of two dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 229–237. doi 10.1037/h0055778 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1086. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shaver, P. R., Wu, S., & Schwartz, J. C. (1992). Cross-cultural similarities and differences in emotion and its representation. In M. S. ClarkEd., Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 175–212). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yik, M. S. M., Russel, J. A., & Feldman Barrett, L. (1999). Structure of self-reported current affect: Integration and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 600–619. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.600 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar