Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Communication

Memory Self-Efficacy and Memory Performance in Older Adults

The Mediating Role of Task Persistence

Published Online:December 21, 2016https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000188

Abstract

Abstract. The present research examined the role persistence plays in mediating the positive impact of memory self-efficacy (MSE, i.e., one’s confidence in one’s own memory abilities) on older adults’ memory performance. In three studies, 81 to 264 older adults completed an MSE scale and carried out an explicit episodic memory task, during which we recorded their study time as an indicator of task persistence. We found that higher MSE was indirectly related to better memory performance through greater persistence during encoding, as measured by longer study time. Indirect effects were of medium size, with point estimates ranging from 0.64 to 0.85. This mediation effect was independent of factors that could be confounded with study time: chronological age, memory span, prior level of memory performance, episodic memory ability, and use of learning strategies (encoding strategies and self-testing). When confronted with difficult memory tasks, older adults who lack confidence in their memory abilities cease their efforts prematurely, which contributes to a decrease in their performance. Encouraging older adults to persist in the face of difficulties during encoding and retrieval may help alleviate the negative impact of low MSE on memory performance and allow researchers and clinicians to more accurately estimate older adults’ true memory abilities.

References

  • Bagwell, D. K., & West, R. L. (2008). Assessing compliance: Active versus inactive trainees in a memory intervention. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 3, 371–382. doi 10.2147/CIA.S1413 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bailey, H., Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2009). Does differential strategy use account for age-related deficits in working memory performance? Psychology and Aging, 24, 82–92. doi 10.1037/a0014078 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bailey, H., Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2010). Metacognitive training at home: Does it improve older adults’ learning? Gerontology, 56, 414–420. doi 10.1159/000266030 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. doi 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 729–735. doi 10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.729 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. RamachandranEd., Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2003). Auto-efficacité: Le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle [Self-efficacy: The sense of personal efficacy]. Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38, 9–44. doi 10.1177/0149206311410606 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beaudoin, M. (2008). Sentiment d’auto-efficacité mnésique et performances de mémoire [Memory self-efficacy and memory performance] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Savoie, Chambéry, France. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beaudoin, M., Agrigoroaei, S., Desrichard, O., Fournet, N., & Roulin, J. L. (2008). Validation of the French version of the Memory Self-Efficacy questionnaire. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 58, 165–176. doi 10.1016/j.erap.2007.09.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beaudoin, M., & Desrichard, O. (2011). Are memory self-efficacy and memory performance related? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 211–241. doi 10.1037/a0022106 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Berry, J. M. (1999). Memory self-efficacy in its social cognitive context. In T. M. HessF. Blanchard-FieldsEds., Social cognition and aging (pp. 69–96). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Berry, J. M., West, R. L., & Dennehey, D. M. (1989). Reliability and validity of the Memory Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Developmental Psychology, 25, 701–713. doi 10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.701 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bryan, J., Luszcz, M. A., & Pointer, S. (1999). Executive function and processing resources as predictors of adult age differences in the implementation of encoding strategies. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 6, 273–287. doi 10.1076/1382-5585(199912)06:04;1-B;FT273 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burt, D. B., Zembar, M. J., & Niederehe, G. (1995). Depression and memory impairment: A meta-analysis of the association, its pattern, and specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 285–305. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.285 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Camp, C. J., Markley, R. P., & Kramer, J. J. (1983). Spontaneous use of mnemonics by elderly individuals. Educational Gerontology, 9, 57–71. doi 10.1080/0380127830090106 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cavanaugh, J. C., & Green, E. E. (1990). I believe, therefore I can: Self-efficacy beliefs in memory aging. In E. A. LovelaceEd., Aging and cognition: Mental processes, self-awareness, and interventions (pp. 189–230). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cervone, D., & Peake, P. K. (1986). Anchoring, efficacy, and action: The influence of judgmental heuristics on self-efficacy judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 492–501. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.492 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Age-related changes in human memory. In D. C. ParkN. SchwarzEds., Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 75–92). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Damisch, L., Stoberock, B., & Mussweiler, T. (2010). Keep your fingers crossed! How superstition improves performance. Psychological Science, 21, 1014–1020. doi 10.1177/0956797610372631 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90: Administration, scoring and procedures manual I for the R(evised) version. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University School of Medicine. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Desrichard, O., & Köpetz, C. (2005). A threat in the elder: The impact of task-instructions, self-efficacy and performance expectations on memory performance in the elderly. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 537–552. doi 10.1002/ejsp.249 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Devolder, P. A., & Pressley, M. (1992). Causal attributions and strategy use in relation to memory performance differences in younger and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 629–642. doi 10.1002/acp.2350060706 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Aging and deficits in associative memory: What is the role of strategy production? Psychology and Aging, 13, 597–607. doi 10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.597 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dunlosky, J., & Kane, M. J. (2007). The contribution of strategy use to working memory span: A comparison of strategy assessment methods. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1227–1245. doi 10.1080/17470210600926075 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fournet, N., Roulin, J.-L., Vallet, F., Beaudoin, M., Agrigoroaei, S., Paignon, A., ... Desrichard, O. (2012). Evaluating short-term and working memory in older adults: French normative data. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 922–930. doi 10.1080/13607863.2012.674487 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Froger, C., Bouazzaoui, B., Isingrini, M., & Taconnat, L. (2012). Study time allocation deficit of older adults: The role of environmental support at encoding? Psychology and Aging, 27, 577–588. doi 10.1037/a0026358 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gardiner, M., Luszcz, M. A., & Bryan, J. (1997). The manipulation and measurement of task-specific memory self-efficacy in younger and older adults. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21, 209–227. doi 10.1080/016502597384839 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gaultney, J. F., Kipp, K., & Kirk, G. (2005). Utilization deficiency and working memory capacity in adult memory performance: Not just for children anymore. Cognitive Development, 20, 205–213. doi 10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.02.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gendolla, G. H. E. (2000). On the impact of mood on behavior: An integrative theory and a review. Review of General Psychology, 4, 378–408. doi 10.1037//1089-2680.4.4.378 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Germain, C. M., & Hess, T. M. (2007). Motivational influences on controlled processing: Moderating distractibility in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 462–486. doi 10.1080/13825580600611302 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hager, W., & Hasselhorn, M. (1992). Memory monitoring and memory performance: Linked closely or loosely? Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 54, 110–113. doi 10.1007/ BF00937139 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. doi 10.1080/03637750903310360 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Henry, J. D., MacLeod, M. S., Phillips, L. H., & Crawford, J. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 19, 27–39. doi 10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.27 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hertzog, C., & Dixon, R. A. (1994). Metacognitive development in adulthood and old age. In J. MetcalfeA. P. ShimamuraEds., Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 227–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., & Hultsch, D. F. (1990). Relationships between metamemory, memory predictions, and memory task performance in adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 215–227. doi 10.1037/0882-7974.5.2.215 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hertzog, C., Lineweaver, T. T., & McGuire, C. L. (1999). Beliefs about memory and aging. In T. M. HessF. Blanchard-FieldsEds., Social cognition and aging (pp. 43–68). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hertzog, C., McGuire, C. L., Horhota, M., & Jopp, D. (2010). Does believing in “use it or lose it” relate to self-rated memory control, strategy use, and recall? International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 70, 61–87. doi 10.2190/AG.70.1.c First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hertzog, C., McGuire, C. L., & Lineweaver, T. T. (1998). Aging, attributions, perceived control, and strategy use in a free recall task. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 5, 85–106. doi 10.1076/ anec.5.2.85.601 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hertzog, C., Price, J., & Dunlosky, J. (2008). How is knowledge generated about memory encoding strategy effectiveness? Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 430–445. doi 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.12.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hess, T. M. (2005). Memory and aging in context. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 383–406. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.383 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Howell, D. C. (1998). Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines [Statistical methods for the social sciences]. Paris, France: De Boeck. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobs, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1984). Understanding persistence: An interface of control theory and self-efficacy theory. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 5, 333–347. doi 10.1207/s15324834basp0504_6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kalska, H., Punamaki, R.-L., Makinen-Pelli, T., & Saarinen, M. (1999). Memory and metamemory functioning among depressed patients. Applied Neuropsychology, 6, 96–107. doi 10.1207/ s15324826an0602_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kanfer, R., Wanberg, C. R., & Kantrowitz, T. M. (2001). Job search and employment: A personality-motivational analysis and meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 837–855. doi 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.837 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kizilbash, A. H., Vanderploeg, R. D., & Curtiss, G. (2002). The effects of depression and anxiety on memory performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 57–67. doi 10.1016/S0887-6177(00)00101-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lachman, M. E., Andreoletti, C., & Pearman, A. (2006). Memory control beliefs: How are they related to age, strategy use and memory improvement? Social Cognition, 24, 359–385. doi 10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.359 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lachman, M. E., Bandura, M., Weaver, S. L., & Elliott, E. (1995). Assessing memory control beliefs: The Memory Controllability Inventory. Aging & Cognition, 2, 67–84. doi 10.1080/ 13825589508256589 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lachman, M. E., Neupert, S. D., & Agrigoroaei, S. (2011). The relevance of control beliefs for health and aging. In K. W. SchaieS. L. WillisEds., Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th ed., pp. 175–190). New York: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • La Rue, A., Small, G., McPherson, S., Komo, S., Matsuyama, S. S., & Jarvik, L. F. (1996). Subjective memory loss in age-associated memory impairment: Family history and neuropsychological correlates. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 3, 132–140. doi 10.1080/13825589608256618 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ledgerwood, A., & Shrout, P. E. (2011). The trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1174–1188. doi 10.1037/a0024776 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luszcz, M. A. (2011). Executive function and cognitive aging. In K. W. SchaieS. L. WillisEds., Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th ed., pp. 59–72). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marquez, D. X., Jerome, G. J., McAuley, E., Snook, E. M., & Canaklisova, S. (2002). Self-efficacy manipulation and state anxiety responses to exercise in low active women. Psychology & Health, 17, 783–791. doi 10.1080/0887044021000054782 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McDonald-Miszczak, L., Hertzog, C., & Hultsch, D. F. (1995). Stability and accuracy of metamemory in adulthood and aging: A longitudinal analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 553–564. doi 10.1037/0882-7974.10.4.553 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McDougall, G. J., Jr. (2009). A framework for cognitive interventions targeting everyday memory performance and memory self-efficacy. Family & Community Health, 32, S15–S26. doi 10.1097/01.FCH.0000342836.20854.fb First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38. doi 10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Murphy, M. D., Sanders, R. E., Gabriesheski, A. S., & Schmitt, F. A. (1981). Metamemory in the aged. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 185–193. doi 10.1093/geronj/36.2.185 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Narciss, S. (2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. Experimental Psychology, 51, 214–228. doi 10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.214 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Pariente, P., & Guelfi, J. D. (1990). Inventaires d’auto-évaluation de la psychopathologie chez l’adulte. 1ère partie: Inventaires multidimensionnels [Self-report symptom inventories for adults. I. Multidimensional questionnaires]. Psychiatrie & Psychobiologie, 5, 49–63. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Park, D. C. (2000). The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. In D. C. ParkN. SchwarzEds., Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 3–21). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pelegrina, S., Bajo, M. T., & Justicia, F. (1999). Allocation of time in self-paced memory tasks: The role of practice, instructions, and individual differences in optimizing performance. Learning & Individual Differences, 11, 401–429. doi 10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80011-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi 10.3758/BF03206553 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93–115. doi 10.1037/a0022658 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43. doi 10.1207/S15328031US0201_02 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rahhal, T. A., Hasher, L., & Colcombe, S. J. (2001). Instructional manipulations and age differences in memory: Now you see them, now you don’t. Psychology and Aging, 16, 697–706. doi 10.1037/0882-7974.16.4.697 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Salancik, G. R., & Conway, M. (1975). Attitude inferences from salient and relevant cognitive content about behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 829–840. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.829 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Mediation of adult age differences in cognition by reductions in working memory and speed of processing. Psychological Science, 2, 179–183. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9280. 1991.tb00127.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Signoret, J. L. (1991). Batterie d’Efficience Mnésique (BEM 144) [Memory Efficiency Battery (BEM 144)]. Paris, France: Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Souchay, C., & Isingrini, M. (2004). Age related differences in metacognitive control: Role of executive functioning. Brain and Cognition, 56, 89–99. doi 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Shake, M. C., Miles, J. R., & Noh, S. R. (2006). Adult age differences in the effects of goals on self-regulated sentence processing. Psychology and Aging, 21, 790–803. doi 10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.790 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371–394. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Taconnat, L., Baudouin, A., Fay, S., Clarys, D., Vanneste, S., Tournelle, L., & Isingrini, M. (2006). Aging and implementation of encoding strategies in the generation of rhymes: The role of executive functions. Neuropsychology, 20, 658–665. doi 10.1037/0894-4105.20.6.658 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vallet, F. (2012). Comment évalue-t-on l’efficience de notre mémoire: Le rôle des attributions causales et des théories naïves [How do people assess their memory efficiency: The role of causal attributions and lay theories] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Savoy, Chambéry, France. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vallet, F., Agrigoroaei, S., Beaudoin, M., Fournet, N., Paignon, A., Roulin, J.-L., & Desrichard, O. (2015). Older adults’ beliefs about forgetting and aging predict memory self-efficacy above and beyond actual memory performance and mental health. International Review of Social Psychology, 28(4), 57–79. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vanier, M., & Lemyze, C. (1994). Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (2nd ed.) [Measurement instrument]. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wechsler, D. (2001). MEM-III: Manuel de l’Echelle Clinique de Mémoire [WMS-III: Wechsler Memory Scale] (3rd ed.) [Measurement instrument]. Paris, France: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wells, G. D., & Esopenko, C. (2008). Memory self-efficacy, aging, and memory performance: The roles of effort and persistence. Educational Gerontology, 34, 520–530. doi 10.1080/03601270701869386 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • West, R. L., Bagwell, D. K., & Dark-Freudeman, A. (2008). Self-efficacy and memory aging: The impact of a memory intervention based on self-efficacy. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15, 302–329. doi 10.1080/13825580701440510 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar