Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Short Research Note

“Next Wednesday’s Meeting has been Moved Forward Two Days”

The Time-Perspective Question is Ambiguous in Swiss German, but not in Standard German

Published Online:March 25, 2019https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000220

Abstract

Abstract. If time is conceived of as a river, we either have the perspective of seeing ourselves as moving downstream toward the future (e.g., “We are approaching the future,” called ego moving), or we have the perspective of the future as moving upstream toward us (e.g., “The future is approaching,” called time moving). Most ego- and time-moving studies have been conducted by using an English ego/time-moving ambiguous question to implicitly measure a person’s current time perspective (ego vs. time moving). In the current study, we replicate previous findings that in (Standard) German the time-perspective question is not ambiguous, while showing as a new finding that it is ambiguous in Swiss German. We attribute this difference to different normative uses in these two German variants. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate dialectal differences in relation to cognitive processing of ego-/time-moving metaphors. Psychological and linguistic implications are discussed.

References

  • Bender, A. & Beller, S. (2014). Mapping spatial frames of reference onto time: A review of theoretical accounts and empirical findings. Cognition, 132, 342–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bender, A., Beller, S. & Bennardo, G. (2010). Temporal frames of reference: Conceptual analysis and empirical evidence from German, English, Mandarin Chinese and Tongan. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853710X531195 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bender, A., Bennardo, G. & Beller, S. (2005). Spatial frames of reference for temporal relations: A conceptual analysis in English, German, and Tongan. In B. G. BaraL. BarsalouM. BucciarelliEds., Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 220–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00434 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. MooreEd., Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Duffy, S. E. & Feist, M. I. (2014). Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0030 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Duffy, S. E., Feist, M. I. & McCarthy, S. (2014). Moving through time: The role of personality in three real-life contexts. Cognitive Science, 38, 1662–1674. 10.1111/cogs.12124 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Elvevåg, B., Helsen, K., De Hert, M., Sweers, K. & Storms, G. (2011). Metaphor interpretation and use: A window into semantics in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 133, 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Feist, M. I. & Duffy, S. E. (2015). Moving beyond “Next Wednesday”: The interplay of lexical semantics and constructional meaning in an ambiguous metaphoric statement. Cognitive Linguistics, 26, 633–656. 10.1515/cog-2015-0052 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hartmann, M., Martarelli, C. S., Mast, F. W. & Stocker, K. (2014). Eye movements during mental time travel follow a diagonal line. Consciousness and Cognition, 30, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Le Guen, O. & Pool Balam, L. I. (2012). No metaphorical timeline in gesture and cognition among Yucatec Mayas. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(271). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00271 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Matlock, T., Ramscar, M. & Boroditsky, L. (2005). On the experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29, 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_17 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McGlone, M. S. & Harding, J. L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1211–1223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1211 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McTaggart, J. E. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind, 17, 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XVII.4.457 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Núñez, R. E., Motz, B. A. & Teuscher, U. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego- and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2103_1 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ramscar, M., Matlock, T. & Dye, M. (2010). Running down the clock: The role of expectation in our understanding of time and motion. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 589–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903381166 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Richmond, J., Wilson, J. C. & Zinken, J. (2012). A feeling for the future: How does agency in time metaphors relate to feelings? European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1906 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rothe-Wulf, A., Beller, S. & Bender, A. (2015). Temporal frames of reference in three Germanic languages: Individual consistency, interindividual consensus, and cross-linguistic variability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 917–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.970205 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ruscher, J. B. (2011). Moving forward: The effect of spatiotemporal metaphors on perceptions about grief. Social Psychology, 42, 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000066 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Russ, C. V. (1994). The German language today: A linguistic introduction. Hove, UK: Psychology Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stocker, K. (2012). The time machine in our mind. Cognitive Science, 36, 385–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01225.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stocker, K., Hartmann, M., Martarelli, C. S. & Mast, F. W. (2016). Eye movements reveal mental looking through time. Cognitive Science, 40, 1648–1670. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12301 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Traugott, E. C. (1975). Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing: A contribution to the study of semantic fields. Semiotica, 15, 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1975.15.3.207 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Weiss, G. (1995). Up-to-date and with a past: The “Duden” and its history. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 6, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/3531328 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar