Dyadic Coping and Marital Satisfaction of Older Spouses in Long-Term Marriage
Abstract
The present study examines the association between coping behavior and their relationship satisfaction in older spousal dyads. We examined N = 132 couples (M age = 68 years) and found that their dyadic coping strategies – a prime indicator of functional adaptation to daily stress in marital context – were significantly linked to relationship satisfaction. Our findings suggest that the partners’ subjective perception of their spouses’ supportive behavior was more strongly linked to their relationship satisfaction than self-reported support. Furthermore, individual support perception was more important for marital satisfaction than coping congruency. Overall, the dyadic coping of older adults may serve as an effective tool to stabilize relationship satisfaction when facing the challenges of older age and long-term marriage.
References
(1994). Gender differences in the link between marital support and satisfaction in older couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 688–698.
(2005). My illness or our illness? Attending to the relationship when one partner is ill. In T. A. Revenson K. Kayser G. Bodenmann, Eds., Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 121–136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2001). The importance of similarity and understanding of partners’ marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 8, 167–185.
(2006). Psychologische Diagnostik und Intervention [
Psychological diagnostics and intervention ] (4., vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Aufl.). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.(2009). Amos 18 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.
(1990). Cognitive-behavioral marital therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
(1996). Assessing relationship standards: The Inventory of Specific Relationship Standards. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 72–88.
(1989). The role of cognitions in marital relationships: Definitional, methodological, and conceptual issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 31–38.
(1997). A temporal model of relationship satisfaction and stability. In R. J. Sternberg J. Hojjat, Eds., Satisfaction in close relationships (pp. 129–159). New York: Guilford.
(1995). Age differences in problem-solving style: The role of emotional salience. Psychology and Aging, 10, 223–247.
(1995). Bewältigung von Stress in Partnerschaften. Der Einfluss von Belastungen auf die Qualität und Stabilität von Paarbeziehungen [
Coping with stress in couples: Effects of strain on the quality and stability of marital relations ]. Bern: Huber.(1997). Dyadic coping – a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140.
(2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren [
Stress and coping in couples ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.(2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. Revenson K. Kayser G. Bodenmann, Eds., Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2008). Dyadic coping and the significance of this concept for prevention and therapy. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 16, 108–111.
(2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 71–89.
(2011). Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being. European Psychologist, 16, 255–266.
(2005). Partnerschaftszufriedenheit in Abhängigkeit der Ehedauer [
Marital satisfaction according to the duration of marriage ]. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 31, 343–362.(2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493.
(2000). Stressbewältigung im Alter: Ein Vergleich von Paaren jüngeren, mittleren und höheren Alters [
Coping in elderly couples: A comparison with young and middle-aged couples ]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 33, 217–228.(2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in a review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964–980.
(1992). Analysis of the association between marital relationships and Health problems. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 39–63.
(1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Ageing, 7, 331–338.
(2010). Perceived empathy, accurate empathy and relationship satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 327–349.
(2005). The relationship enhancement model of social support. In T. A. Revenson K. Kayser G. Bodenmann, Eds., Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 73–95). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
(2000). Similarity of the relation between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 419–436.
(2010). It takes two to tango: Why older people have the best relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 172–176.
(1999). Interpersonal and psychological correlates of marital dissatisfaction in late life: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 359–378.
(2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036–1045.
(2007). Dyadisches Coping in Selbst-und Fremdwahrnehmung als Prädiktor für Partnerschaftsqualität und Befinden [
Dyadic coping in the self and partner perception as a predictor of relationship quality and well-being ]. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 15, 177–186.(2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 737–745.
(1996). Fragebogen zur Partnerschaftsdiagnostik (FPD), Partnerschaftsfragebogen PFB, Problemliste PL und Fragebogen zur Lebensgeschichte und Partnerschaft FLP [
Partnership Questionnaire, Marital Quality Questionnaire, Problem List, and Biography and Partnership Questionniare ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.(1992). Zur Erfassung der Ehequalität: Ein Vergleich der “Dyadic Adjustment Scale” (DAS) und des “Partnerschaftsfragebogens” (PFB) [
Assessing marital quality: Comparison of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) with the Partnerschaftsfragebogen (PFB) ]. Diagnostica, 38, 312–327.(2010). Prevention of marital instability and distress. Results of an 11-year longitudinal follow-up study. Behavior Research and Therapy, 48, 377–383.
(2001). Der Partnerschaftsfragebogen (PFB): Normierung und soziodemografische Einflussgrössen auf die Partnerschaftsqualität [
The “Partnerschaftsfragebogen” (marital quality questionnaire): Psychometric norms and sociodemographic influences on partnership quality ]. Diagnostica, 47, 132–141.(2012). The link between perceptual congruence and couple relationship satisfaction in dyadic coping. European Psychologist, 17, 73–82.
(2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis C. M. Judd, Eds., Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451–477). Cambridge University Press.
(1996). Long-term satisfying marriages: Perceptions of contributing factors. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 24, 153–170.
(1988). Interpersonal perception: A social relations’ analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 247–261.
(2001). Accuracy and bias in perceptions of the partner in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 439–448.
(1991). Perceived support and adjustment to stress: Methodological considerations. In H. O. F. Veiel U. Baumann, Eds., The meaning and measurement of social support (pp. 259–271). New York: Hemisphere.
(2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503.
(2000). Der SF-36-Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand: Anwendung, Auswertung und Interpretation [
SF-36 Questionnaire concerning health status: Use, scoring and interpretation ]. In , Lebensqualität und Gesundheitsökonomie in der Medizin (pp. 73–85). Landsberg: Ecomed.(2011). Quality of marital relationship and depression: Results of a 10-year prospective follow-up study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 128, 64–71.
(1992). Lebenskrisen und die Bewältigung gesundheitlicher Belastungen [
Life crises and overcoming health impairments ]. In , Der ältere Mensch – wie er denkt und handelt (S. 89–116). Bern: Huber.(2000). Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: Three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 256–285.
(2007). The efficacy of the couples coping enhancement training (CCET) in improving relationship quality. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 940–959.
(2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834–853.
(1993). Long-term marriage: Age, gender, and satisfaction. Psychology and Ageing, 8, 301–313.
(1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In W. Burr R. Hill. F. Nye I. Reiss, Eds., Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2, pp. 268–294). New York: The Free Press.
Lindenberger, U. Smith, J. Mayer, K. U. Baltes, P. B. Eds. (2010). Die Berliner Altersstudie [
The Berlin Aging Study ] (3rd ed.). Berlin: Akademie.(2001). Age differences in stress, social resources and well-being in middle and older age. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56, 214–222.
(2006). Living apart together: Couples living apart compared with couples in traditional living arrangements. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 1, 27–45.
(2010). Romantic partners’ individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: Implications for relationship functioning. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 551–559.
(2011). When 2 is better than 1 + 1: Older spouses’individual and dyadic problem solving. European Psychologist, 16, 288–294.
(2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115.
(2006). Marital satisfaction: Psychometric properties of the PFB and comparison with the DAS. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 55–63.
(1993). Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 845–855.
(2007). Marital interaction in middle and old age: A predictor of marital satisfaction? International Journal of Ageing and Human Development, 65, 283–300.
(1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New Scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
(2001). Equity and social exchange in dating couples: Associations with satisfaction, commitment, and stability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 599–613.
(1938). Psychological factors in marital happiness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
(1996). Marital history at midlife as a predictor of longevity: Alternative explanations to the protective effect of marriage. Health Psychology, 15, 94–101.
(2001). Marital happiness, marital duration, and the u-shaped curve: Evidence from a five-wave panel study. Social Forces, 79, 1313–1341.
(2009). The health and relationship dynamics of late-life couples: A systematic review of the literature. Ageing and Society, 29, 455–480.
(2008). The relationship between marital standards, dyadic coping and marital satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 462–476.
