Advance Care Planning for Persons with Intellectual Disabilities
Abstract
Abstract. As people live longer, they become more likely to die from prolonged, incurable, chronic illnesses occurring more frequently in old age. This study explores the usefulness, quality, and reliability of documented advance care planning interviews to determine the decision-making capacity of persons with intellectual disabilities (IDs). A volunteer sample of 60 persons rated the capacity to consent to treatment of four persons deciding on two end-of-life decisions. Sensitivity, specificity, and percent agreement were calculated. Interrater reliability was assessed using Fleiss’ κ and Krippendorff’s α. A Yates’ corrected χ2 was used to analyze differences in ratings between groups of raters. The sensitivity value was 62%; the specificity value was 95%. The percent agreement for all participants was 70%, Fleiss’ κ was 0.396, and Krippendorff’s α was 0.395. Of the participants, 72 found documented advance care planning discussions useful for diagnosing the decision-making capacity of people with IDs. The documented interviews helped to identify those persons with IDs who had the decision-making capacity. Documented interviews on end-of-life decisions could make a valuable contribution to fostering their self-determination in end-of-life issues.
References
2016). Die Zukunft ist jetzt! Personenzentrierte Zukunftsplanung. Arbeitsbuch und Leitfaden. [
(The future is now! Person-centered future planning. Work book and guidelines ]. Zurich: Interkantonale Hochschule für Heilpädagogik.2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
(2014). Respecting autonomy in the end-of-life care of people with intellectual disabilities: A qualitative multiple-case study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58, 368–380. doi 10.1111/jir.12023
(2014). Decision making about medical interventions in the end-of-life care of people with intellectual disabilities: A national survey of the considerations and beliefs of GPs, ID physicians and care staff. Patient Education and Counseling, 96, 204–209. doi 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.014
(2001). Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
(2008). Kurzgefasste Statistik für die klinische Forschung (3rd ed.) [
(Short statistics for clinical research ]. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.2013). Zukunftsplanung zum Lebensende: Was ich will! [
(Future planning for the end of life: My wishes ]. Retrieved from http:// www.foerderverein-bonn-beuel.de/bilder/patientenverfuegung_72–1.pdf1995). The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study: III. Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 149–174.
(2004). Altern mit geistiger Behinderung: Grundlagen und Perspektiven für Begleitung, Bildung und Rehabilitation [
(Aging with IDs: Basics and perspectives for support ] (2nd ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.2010). Living well and planning for the end of your life: Using person centered thinking tools with people who have a life limiting illness. Retrieved from http://www.helensandersonassociates.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/livingwell-hull.pdf
(2015). Physicians’ personal values in determining medical decision-making capacity: A survey study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 9, 739–744. doi 10.1136/medethics-2014-102263.
(2012). Surrogate decision making for patients with end-stage dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatrie, 27, 1045–1052.
(2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2013). Assessing patient capacity to consent to treatment: An integrative review of instruments and tools. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(17–18), 2387–2403. doi 10.1111/jocn.12215
(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
(2005). (c. 9, §§ 4–7). Retrieved from https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/a-to-z/m/mental-capacity-act-2005
(2013). Assessment of capacity in an aging society. American Psychologist, 68, 158–171. doi 10.1037/a0032159
(2013). Advance care planning: Communicating about matters of life and death. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
(2011). Intellectual developmental disorders: Toward a new name, definition and framework for “mental retardation/intellectual disability” in ICD-11. World Psychiatry, 10, 175–180. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3188762/pdf/wpa030175.pdf
(2006). National survey of end-of-life decisions made by UK medical practitioners. Palliative Medicine, 20, 3–10.
(2013). Assessment of decision-making capacity: Views and experiences of consultation psychiatrists. Psychosomatics, 54, 115–123.
(2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
(2006). The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: A systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine, 13, 493–497.
(2008). Providing palliative care to people with intellectual disabilities: Services, staff knowledge, and challenges. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 9, 1241–1248. doi 10.1089/jpm.2008.0130
(2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9, 1–11.
(2017). Defining advance care planning for adults: A consensus definition from a multidisciplinary Delphi panel. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 53, 821–832.
(2003). The palliative care needs of people with intellectual disabilities: A literature review. Palliative Medicine, 17(1), 55–62. doi 10.1191/0269216303pm668oa
(2017). Advance care planning in palliative care for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. , Journal of Pain and Symptom Management.. Advance online publication. doi 10.1016/ j.jpainsymman. 2017.04.01
(2010). End-of-life decisions: An important theme in the care for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 516–524.
(2013). End-of-life decisions for people with intellectual disabilities: An interview study with patient representatives. Palliative Medicine, 27, 765–771. doi 10.1177/0269216312468932
(2016). Withholding treatment and intellectual disability: Second survey on end-of-life decisions in Switzerland. SAGE Open Medicine, 4, 1–6. doi 10.1177/2050312116652637
(2016). End-of-life decisions for people with intellectual disability: A Swiss survey. International Journal of Developmental Disability, 62, 177–181. doi 10.1080/ 20473869.2015.1107363
(2015). Mit Leitlinien die Selbstbestimmung stärken? Effekte von Leitlinien auf Palliative Care und Entscheidungen am Lebensende. [
(Fostering self-determination with guidelines: Effects of written policies on palliative care and end-of-life decisions ]. Vierteljahresschrift für Heilpädagogik und ihre Nachbargebiete, 84(1), 34–45.2015). Zwischen Schutz und Selbstbestimmung - Entscheidungen am Lebensende in den Wohnheimen der Behindertenhilfe in der Schweiz. [
(Between care and self-determination: End-of-life decisions in residential homes for people with disabilities in Switzerland ]. Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik, 21, 379–387.