Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.111

Zusammenfassung. In einer Studie mit 480 jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen wurde eine deutsche Version des “Big Five Inventory (BFI)“ eingesetzt. Es wurde die Äquivalenz der faktoriellen Struktur in den Altersgruppen sowie die Kriteriumsvalidität in Bezug auf 6 Außenkriterien überprüft (Intelligenz, positiver und negativer Affekt, Kontrollerleben, soziale Zufriedenheit und Netzwerkgröße). Die Stichprobe beruht auf einer nach Alter und Geschlecht geschichteten Wahrscheinlichkeitsauswahl aus dem Berliner Melderegister. Die Befunde weisen auf eine Invarianz der Faktorenstruktur in den Altersgruppen hin. Es zeigten sich erwartungskonforme und altersinvariante Korrelationen der 5 Persönlichkeitskonstrukte Extraversion, Verträglichkeit, Gewissenhaftigkeit, Neurotizismus und Offenheit für Erfahrung mit den Außenkriterien. In einer Studie mit 45 sehr alten Erwachsenen zeigten sich moderate bis hohe Retest-Stabilitäten über einen Zeitraum von 5 Monaten. Insgesamt erweist sich der BFI als leicht einsetzbares Instrument zur reliablen Erfassung des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells.


Validity and psychometric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory in young, middle-aged and old adults

Abstract. In a study with 480 young, middle-aged, and old adults the psychometric equivalence and external validity of the German version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI) was examined across age groups. In addition, external validity of the BFI was explored in relation to general intelligence, positive affect, negative affect, social satisfaction, control beliefs, and social network size. Findings suggest a five factor solution of personality constructs that is found to be invariant across the three age cohort groups. Moreover, there is good indication of external validity of the five factors that is found to be equivalent across the three age groups. In a follow-up study with 45 older adults, the BFI was assessed twice within a time interval of 5 months. Moderate to high retest stability was observed. Findings suggest that the BFI is well-suited for measuring the five factor model of personality and is particularly adequate for application in diverse and age heterogenous samples.

Literatur

  • Asendorpf, J. B. (1999). Psychologie der Persönlichkeit. . Berlin: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Asendorpf, J. B. Wilpers, S. (1998). Personality effects on social relationships.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1531– 1544 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation.. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248– 287 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barret, L. F. Pietromonaco, P. R. (1997). Accuracy of the five factor model in predicting perceptions of daily social interactions.. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1173– 1187 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benet-Martinez, V. John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the big five in spanish and english.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729– 750 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI). . Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Church, T. A. Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the big five and Tellgen’s three and four-dimensional models.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93– 114 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Côté, S. Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 1032– 1046 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model.. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417– 440 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Everett, J. E. (1983). Factor comparability as a means of determining the number of factors and their rotation.. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 197– 218 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Feichtinger, L. Laireiter, A. Untner, A. Baumann, U. (1992). Zum Zusammenhang zwischen Persönlichkeit und Sozialem Netzwerk bzw. Netzwerkressourcen - Literaturüberblick und Pilotstudie.. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 4, 233– 247 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fleeson, W. Baltes, P. B. (1998). Beyond present-day personality assessment: An encouraging exploration of the measurement properties and predictive power of subjective lifetime personality.. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 411– 430 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five structure.. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26– 42 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graziano, W. G. Jensen-Campbell, L. A. Hair, C. H. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820– 835 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hofstee, W. K. B. ten Berge, J. M. F. Hendriks, A. A. J. (1998). How to score questionnaires.. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 441– 444 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P. Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives.. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp.102-138). New York: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kempen, G. I. van Sonderen, E. Ormel, J. (1999). The impact of psychological attributes on changes in disability among low-functioning older persons.. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 54B, P23– P29 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kurdek, L. A. (1997). Relation between neuroticism and dimensions of relationship commitment: Evidence from gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples.. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 109– 124 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, F. R. (2000). Endings and continuity of social relationships: maximizing intrinsic benefits within personal networks when feeling near to death.. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 157– 184 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, F. R. Staudinger, U. M. Carstensen, L. L. (1998). Perspectives on socioemotional selectivity in late life: How personality and social context do (and do not) make a difference.. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 53B, P21– P30 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lienert, G. A. Raatz, U. (1998). Testaufbau und Testanalyse. . Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lindenberger, U. Reischies, F. (1999). Limits and potentials of intellectual functioning in old age.. In P. B. Baltes & K. U. Mayer (Eds.), The Berlin Aging Study (pp. 329-359). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lüdtke, O. (1999). Validierung des Big Five Inventory bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen. . Freie Universität Berlin und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Martocchio, J. J. Judge, T. A. (1997). Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 764– 773 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mayer, K. U. Baltes, P. B. (1996). (Hrsg.) Die Berliner Altersstudie. . Berlin: Akademie Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R. Costa, P. T., Jr. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full-five factor model and well-being.. Personality and Social Psychology Bullettin, 17, 227– 232 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R. Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience.. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 826-842). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R. Costa, P. T., Jr. Pedroso de Lima, M. Simoes, A. Ostendorf, F. Angleitner, A. Marusic, I. Bratko, D. Caprara, G. V. Barbanelli, C. Chae, J.-H. Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures.. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466– 477 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R. Zondermann, A. B. Costa, P. T., Jr. Bond, M. H. Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventoy: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552– 566 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morrison, K. A. (1997). Personality correlates of the Five-Factor Model for a sample of business owners/managers: Associations with scores on self-monitoring, Type A behavior, locus of control, and subjective well-being.. Psychological Reports, (1997). 80, 255– 272 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, W. D. Stumpf, H. (1998). A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments.. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 1005– 1025 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paunonen, S. V. (1997). On chance and factor congruence following orthogonal procrustes rotation.. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 33– 59 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pulkkinen, L. Rönkä, A. (1994). Personal control over development, identity formation, and future orientation as components of life orientation: A developmental approach.. Developmental Psychology, 30, 260– 271 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B. (1997). Die deutsche Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI): Übersetzung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit. . Universität Bielefeld: Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rusting, C. L. Larsen, R. I. (1997). Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models.. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 607– 612 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmutte, P. S. Ryff, C. D. (1997). Personality and well-being: Reexamining methods and meanings.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 549– 559 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schönemann, P. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem.. Psychometrika, 31, 1– 10 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1999). A legitimate case of component analysis of ipsative measures, and partialing the mean as an alternative to ipsatization.. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 89– 102 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D. Clark, L. A. Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063– 1070 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D. Clark, L. A. (1992). On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to the five-factor model.. Journal of Personality, 60, 441– 476 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar