Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000124

Bei der Erfassung persönlichkeitsrelevanter Eigenschaften kommen evaluativ negativere Dispositionen oft zu kurz. Diese sind jedoch besonders in interpersonellen Situationen wichtig. Die „Dunkle Triade”, bestehend aus Narzissmus, Psychopathie und Machiavellismus bietet die Möglichkeit diese verwandten Konstrukte und ihre Effekte spezifisch zu untersuchen. Im deutschen Sprachraum werden derzeit drei separate und umfangreiche Instrumente zu deren Messung benötigt. In drei Studien (N = 501; N = 828; N = 96) wird die Validierung einer deutschen Version (das „Dreckige Dutzend”) der „Dirty Dozen”-Kurzskalen (Jonason & Webster, 2010), sowie eine psychometrisch optimierte Version (die „Niederträchtigen Neun”) zur Erfassung der Kernaspekte der Dunklen Triade vorgestellt. Die vier bzw. drei Items umfassenden Skalen beider Instrumente weisen eine gute Struktur, interne Konsistenz und Stabilität auf. Darüber hinaus zeigen die Skalen zufriedenstellende konvergente Beziehungen zu den Standardverfahren der Dunklen Triade, differenzierte Zusammenhänge mit weiteren relevanten Persönlichkeitskonstrukten (z. B. Big Five-Facetten, Aggressivität, Soziosexualität) und prädizieren charakteristische Verhaltensweisen. Implikationen für die Erfassung der Dunklen Triade in Forschungs- und Anwendungskontexten werden diskutiert.


The Dirty Dozen and the Naughty Nine: Short scales for the assessment of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy

When assessing personality dimensions, potentially negative characteristics are often given little attention. However, they are of particular importance in interpersonal situations. The Dark Triad, consisting of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism, offers the opportunity to investigate these constructs and their specific effects. For the assessment of the Dark Triad three different and extensive questionnaires are currently used. In three studies (N = 501; N = 828; N = 96) the validation of the German version of the Dirty Dozen scales (Jonason & Webster, 2010) as well as a psychometrically optimized version (the Naugthy Nine) to assess core aspects of the Dark Triad is presented. The scales show a good structure, internal consistencies, and stability. Moreover, the scales show sufficient convergent associations to the standard measures of the Dark Triad, differentiated relations to other personality constructs (e. g., Big Five-facets, aggression, sociosexuality), and predict characteristic behaviors. Implications for the assessment of the Dark Triad in research and applied contexts are discussed.

Literatur

  • Ackerman, R. A., Witt, E. A., Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W. & Kashy, D. A. (2011). What does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory really measure? Assessment, 18, 67 – 87. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ahmed, S. M. S. & Stewart, R. A. C. (1981). Factor analysis of the Machiavellian scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 113 – 115. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Alpers, G. W. & Eisenbarth, H. (2008). Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R). Deutsche Version. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Back, M. D. & Egloff, B. (2009). Yes we can! A plea for direct behavioural observation in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 23, 403 – 405. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Back, M. D., Küfner, A. C. P., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T. M., Rauthmann, J. F. & Denissen, J. J. A. (2013). Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 1013 – 1037. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C. & Egloff, B. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533 – 548. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C. & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132 – 145. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645 – 657. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bushman, B. J. & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219 – 229. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, A. H. & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452 – 459. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, W. K., Brunell, A. B. & Finkel, E. J. (2006). Narcissism, interpersonal self-regulation, and romantic relationships: An agency model approach. In E. J. FinkelK. D. VohsEds., Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 57 – 83). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, W. K. & Miller, D. J. (Hrsg.). (2011). The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chabrol, H., Van Leeuwen, N., Rodgers, R. & Sejourne, N. (2009). Contributions of psychopathic, narcissistic, Machiavellian, and sadistic personality traits to juvenile delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 734 – 739. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Christie, R. & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Christie, R. & Lehman, S. (1970). The structure of Machiavellian orientations. In R. ChristieF. L. GeisEds., Studies in Machiavellianism (pp. 359 – 387). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Collani, G. von & Herzberg, P. Y. (2003). Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl von Rosenberg. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 3 – 7. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Cooke, D. J. & Michie, C. (2001). Refining the construct of psychopathy: Towards a hierarchical model. Psychological Assessment, 13, 171 – 188. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corral, S. & Calvete, E. (2000). Machiavellianism: Dimensionality of the Mach IV and its relation to self-monitoring in a Spanish sample. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3, 3 – 13. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corry, N., Merritt, R. D., Mrug, S. & Pamp, B. (2008). The factor structure of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 593 – 600. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assesssment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dufner, M., Rauthmann, J. F., Czarna, A. & Denissen, J. A. A. (2013). Are narcissists sexy? Zeroing in on the association between narcissism and mate-appeal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 870 – 882. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11 – 17. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fehr, B., Samsom, D. & Paulhus, D. L. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. D. SpielbergerJ. N. ButcherEds., Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 9, pp. 77 – 116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Forth, A. E., Brown, S. L., Hart, S. D. & Hare, R. D. (1996). The assessment of psychopathy in male and female noncriminals: Reliability and validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 531 – 543. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A., Richards, S. C. & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The Dark Triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199 – 216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J. & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504 – 528. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 7 – 16. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R). Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Herzberg, P. Y. (2003). Faktorstruktur, Gütekriterien und Konstruktvalidität der deutschen Übersetzung des Aggressionsfragebogens von Buss und Perry. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 311 – 323. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1 – 55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P. & Buss, D. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 373 – 378. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K., Slomski, S. & Partyka, J. (2012). The Dark Triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 449 – 453. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jonason, P. K. & Webster, G. D. (2010). The Dirty Dozen: A Concise Measure of the Dark Triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420 – 432. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. N. & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. LearyR. H. DoyleEds., Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93 – 108). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, D. N. & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 679 – 682. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kubarych, T. S., Deary, I. J. & Austin, E. J. (2004). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Factor structure in a non-clinical sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 857 – 872. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Küfner, A. C. P., Nestler, S. & Back, M. D. (2013). The two pathways to being an (un‐)popular narcissist. Journal of Personality, 81, 184 – 195. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, F. R., John, D., Lüdtke, O., Schupp, J. & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 548 – 567. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K. B. & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571 – 1582. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. & Widows, M. R. (2005). Psychopathic Personality Inventory Revised (PPI-R). Professional Manual. Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Campbell, W. K., Young, D. L., Lakey, C. E., Reidy, D. E., Zeichner, A. et al. (2009). Examining the relations among narcissism, impulsivity, and self-defeating behaviors. Journal of Personality, 77, 761 – 794. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J. & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, 1013 – 1042. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, J. D., Maples, J. & Campbell, W. K. (2011). Comparing the construct validity of scales derived from the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: A reply to Rosenthal and Hooley (2010). Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 401 – 407. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morf, C. C. & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177 – 196. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morf, C. C., Schürch, E., Siegrist, P., Schröder-Abé, M., Vater, A., Küfner, A. C. P. et al. (in preparation). German translation and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI): Expanding the nomological network. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Neal, T. M. S. & Sellbom, M. (2012). Examining the factor structure of the Hare Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 244 – 253. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ostendorf, F. & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, Revidierte Fassung. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. (2001). Normal narcissism: Two minimalist accounts. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 228 – 230. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L., Neumann, C. S. & Hare, R. D. (in press). Manual for the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Toronto, ON, Canada: Multi-Health Systems. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556 – 563. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Penke, L. & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond Global Sociosexual Orientations: A More Differentiated Look at Sociosexuality and Its Effects on Courtship and Romantic Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113 – 1135. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C. & Levy, K. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21, 365 – 379. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B. & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203 – 212. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raskin, R. & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). Towards multifaceted Machiavellianism: Content, factorial, and construct validity of a German Machiavellianism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 345 – 351. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rauthmann, J. F. & Will, T. (2011). Proposing a multidimensional Machiavellianism conceptualization. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 391 – 403. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M. & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151 – 161. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenthal, S. A., Montoya, R. M., Ridings, L. E., Rieck, S. M. & Hooley, J. M. (2011). Further evidence of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory’s validity problems: A meta-analytic investigation-Response to Miller, Maples, and Campbell (this issue). Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 408 – 416. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507 – 514. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schütz, A., Marcus, B. & Sellin, I. (2004). Die Messung von Narzissmus als Persönlichkeitskonstrukt: Psychometrische Eigenschaften einer Lang- und einer Kurzform des deutschen NPI (Narcissistic Personality Inventory). Diagnostica, 50, 202 – 218. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Shajek, A. (2007). Entwicklung zweier Kurzskalen zur Messung von Machiavellismus und Egoismus. Dokumentation eines Instrumententests auf Basis des SOEP-Pretests 2006. Berlin: DIW Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shelby, D. H. & Chonko, L. B. (1984). Marketing and Machiavellianism. Journal of Marketing, 48, 30 – 42. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vazire, S. & Funder, D. C. (2006). Impulsivity and the self-defeating behavior of narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 154 – 165. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Widiger, T. A. (2011). The DSM-5 dimensional model of personality disorder: rationale and empirical support. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 222 – 234. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, K. M. & Paulhus, D. L. (2004). Factor structure of the Self-Report Psychopathy scale (SRP-II) in non-forensic samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 765 – 778. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, K. M., Paulhus, D. L. & Hare, R. D. (2007). Capturing the four-factor structure of psychopathy in college students via self-report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 205 – 219. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zook, A. & Sipps, G. J. (1986). Reliability data and sex-differences with a gender-free MACH-IV. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 131 – 132. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar