Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Diskussionsforum

Positionspapier zur Rolle der Psychologischen Methodenlehre in Forschung und Lehre

Published Online:October 24, 2018https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000417
Free first page

Literatur

  • Abele-Brehm, A., Bühner, M., Deutsch, R., Erdfelder, E., Fydrich, T. & Gollwitzer, M., et al. (2014). Bericht der Kommission „Studium und Lehre“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 65, 230 – 235. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000226 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Abele-Brehm, A., Bühner, M., Deutsch, R., Erdfelder, E., Fydrich, T. & Gollwitzer, M., et al. (2015). Bericht der Kommission „Studium und Lehre“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie - Teil II: Masterstudium Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 66, 31 – 36. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000248 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Anderson, S. F. & Maxwell, S. E. (2016). There’s more than one way to conduct a replication study: Beyond statistical significance. Psychological Methods, 21, 1 – 12. https://10.1037/met0000051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bermeitinger, C., Kaup, B., Kiesel, A., Koch, I., Kunde, W. & Müsseler, J., et al. (2016). Positionspapier zur Lage der Allgemeinen Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 67, 175 – 207. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000317 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Clarivate Analytics. (2017). 2016 Journal Citation Reports® Social Sciences Edition. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Davier, M. von & Carstensen, C. H. (Eds.). (2007). Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models – Extensions and applications. New York: Springer. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Erdfelder, E., Auer, T.-S., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M. & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 217, 108 – 124. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Erdfelder, E. & Ulrich, R. (2018). Zur Methodologie von Replikationsstudien. Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 3 – 21. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000387 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Fiedler, K. (2016). Empfehlungen der DGPs-Kommission „Qualität der psychologischen Forschung“. Psychologische Rundschau, 67, 59 – 74. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000316 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Fiedler, K. (2018). Wo sind die wissenschaftlichen Standards für hochwertige Replikationsforschung? Psychologische Rundschau, 69, 45 – 56. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000338 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Frey, A., Kroehne, U., Seitz, N.-N. & Born, S. (2017). Multidimensional adaptive measurement of competencies. In D. LeutnerJ. FleischerJ. GrünkornE. KliemeEds., Competence assessment in education: Research, models and instruments (pp. 369 – 387). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50030-0_22 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gelman, A. & Loken, E. (2014). The statistical crisis in science. American Scientist, 102, 460. https://doi.org/10.1511/2014.111.460 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ho, Y.-S. & Hartley, J. (2015). Classic articles in psychology in the science citation index expanded: A bibliometric analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 107, 768 – 780. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12163 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoffman, L. (2015). Longitudinal analysis: Modeling within-person fluctuation and change. New York: Routledge. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hütter, M. & Klauer, K. C. (2016). Applying processing trees in social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 116 – 159. https:l//doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1212966 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Khorramdel, L. & Davier, M. von (2016). Item response theory as a framework for test construction. In K. SchweizerC. DiStefanoEds., Principles and methods of test construction (pp. 52 – 80). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kubinger, K. D. (2016). Adaptive testing. In K. SchweizerC. DiStefanoEds., Principles and methods of test construction (pp. 104 – 119). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y. & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist, 70, 487 – 498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McArdle, J. (2012). Latent curve modeling of longitudinal growth data. In R. H. HoyleEd., Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 547 – 570). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P. & Revicki, D. A. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of item response theory modeling. New York: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schönbrodt, F., Gollwitzer, M. & Abele-Brehm, A. (2017). Der Umgang mit Forschungsdaten im Fach Psychologie: Konkretisierung der DFG-Leitlinien. Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 20 – 35. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000341 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359 – 1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steyer, R., Mayer, A., Geiser, C. & Cole, D. A. (2015). A theory of states and traits – revisited. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 71 – 98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153719 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ulrich, R., Erdfelder, E., Deutsch, R., Strauß, B., Brüggemann, A. & Hannover, B., et al. (2016). Inflation von falsch-positiven Befunden in der psychologischen Forschung: Mögliche Ursachen und Gegenmaßnahmen. Psychologische Rundschau, 67, 163 – 174. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000296 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Ulrich, R. & Miller, J. (2014). P-hacking by post hoc selection with multiple opportunities: Detectability by skewness test? Comment on Simonsohn, Nelson, and Simmons (2014). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 1137 – 1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000086 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ulrich, R., Miller, J. & Erdfelder, E. (2018). Effect size estimation from t-statistics in the presence of publication bias: A brief review of existing approaches with some extensions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226, 56 – 80. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000319 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Voelkle, M. C., Oud, J. H. L., Davidov, E. & Schmidt, P. (2012). An SEM approach to continuous time modeling of panel data: Relating authoritarianism and anomia. Psychological Methods, 17, 176 – 192. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Voss, A., Nagler, M. & Lerche, V. (2013). Diffusion models in experimental psychology: A practical introduction. Experimental Psychology, 60, 385 – 402. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000218 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Wagenmakers, E.-J., Morey, R. D. & Lee, M. D. (2016). Bayesian benefits for the pragmatic researcher. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 169 – 176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416643289 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wissenschaftsrat. (2018). Perspektiven der Psychologie in Deutschland (Drs. 6825 – 18). Verfügbar unter https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/6825-18.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar