Skip to main content

Phonologische Bewusstheit

Ist die phonologische Bewusstheit ein Prädiktor für die Leseleistung?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000135

Zusammenfassung. In der Forschungsliteratur besteht Konsens, dass phonologische Bewusstheit ein spezifischer Prädiktor für den Schriftspracherwerb ist. Eine genaue Klärung des reziproken Zusammenhangs zwischen phonologischer Bewusstheit und Lesen liegt bisher allerdings nicht vor, da viele Längsschnittstudien die Lesefähigkeiten zum ersten Messzeitpunkt nicht berücksichtigten. In dieser Arbeit wird untersucht, ob phonologische Bewusstheit Leseleistungen auch dann prädiziert, wenn eine Kontrolle des frühen Lesens erfolgt. An 340 deutschsprachigen Kindern wurden Lesen und phonologische Bewusstheit zu Schuleintritt und am Ende der ersten Klasse erhoben. Ein Strukturgleichungsmodell zeigte, dass unter Berücksichtigung der Lesefähigkeiten am Anfang der ersten Klasse keine signifikante Prädiktion der phonologischen Bewusstheit auf die späteren Leseleistungen vorlag. Die Vorhersagekraft der phonologischen Bewusstheit für spätere Lesefähigkeiten ist offenbar vorwiegend durch frühe Lesekompetenzen erklärbar.


Is Phonological Awareness a Predictor for Reading?

Abstract. There is general consensus that phonological awareness is an important specific predictor of reading development. A more specific clarification of the reciprocal relation between phonological awareness and reading skills is still missing, as most longitudinal studies did not account for reading skills at the first assessment. We investigated whether phonological awareness predicts reading skills when early reading is assessed. Phonological awareness and reading skills were assessed in a sample of 340 German-speaking children at the beginning and the end of Grade 1. A structural equation model showed no prediction of phonological awareness on later reading achievement after controlling for reading skills at school entry. Thus, the prediction of phonological awareness in later reading abilities seems to be mostly explained by early reading skills.

Literatur

  • Caravolas, M., Lervag, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C. L. M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E. & Salas, N. et al. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678 – 686. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Castles, A. & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77 – 111. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Jong, P. F. & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450 – 476. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Jong, P. F. & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51 – 77. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ehri, L. C. (1989). The development of spelling knowledge and its role in reading acquisition and reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 356 – 365. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5 – 21. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ennemoser, M., Marx, P., Weber, J. & Schneider, W. (2012). Spezifische Vorläuferfertigkeiten der Lesegeschwindigkeit, des Leseverständnisses und des Rechtschreibens. Evidenz aus zwei Längsschnittstudien vom Kindergarten bis zur 4. Klasse. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 44, 53 – 67. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Foulin, J. N. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18, 129 – 155. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fox, B. & Routh, D. K. (1984). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills: Revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1059 – 1064. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geiser, C. (2011). Datenanalyse mit Mplus. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goswami, U. & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, East Sussex, England: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C. & Ellis, A. W. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41 – 57. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hogan, T. P., Catts, H. W. & Little, T. D. (2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: Implications for the assessment of phonological awareness. Clinical Forum, 36, 285 – 293. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hulme, C., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J. & Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 2 – 28. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jansen, H., Mannhaupt, G., Marx, H. & Skowronek, H. (2002). Bielefelder Screening zur Früherkennung von Lese-Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klicpera, C., Schabmann, A. & Gasteiger-Klicpera, B. (2013). Legasthenie–LRS (4., akt. Aufl.). München: Reinhardt. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Landerl, K. (2009). Lese-/Rechtschreibstörung. In S. SchneiderJ. MargrafHrsg., Lehrbuch der Verhaltenstherapie. Störungen des Kindes- und Jugendalter (S. 395 – 410). Heidelberg: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Landerl, K. & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150 – 161. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Landerl, K., Ramus, F., Moll, K., Lyytinen, H., Leppänen, P. & Lohvansuu, K. et al. (2013). Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying consistency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 686 – 694. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mann, V. & Wimmer, H. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing, 15, 653 – 682. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marx, P. & Lenhard, W. (2010). Diagnostische Merkmale von Screeningverfahren. In M. HasselhornW. SchneiderHrsg., Frühprognose schulischer Kompetenzen. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S. A. H. & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322 – 352. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moll, K. & Landerl, K. (2010). SLRT-II Lese- und Rechtschreibtest. Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moll, K., Fussenegger, B., Willburger, E. & Landerl, K. (2009). Ran is not a measure of orthographic processing. Evidence from the asymmetric German orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 1 – 25. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moll, K., Ramus, F., Bartling, J., Bruder, J., Kunze, S. & Neuhoff, N. et al. (2014). Reading development in European orthographies: Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65 – 77. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moll, K., Wallner, R. & Landerl, K. (2012). Kognitive Korrelate der Lese-, Leserechtschreib- und der Rechtschreibstörung. Lernen und Lernstörungen, 1, 7 – 19. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, B., Križan, A., Hecht, T., Richter, T. & Ennemoser, M. (2013). Leseflüssigkeit im Grundschulalter: Entwicklungsverlauf und Effekte systematischer Leseförderung. Lernen und Lernstörungen, 2, 131 – 146. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., Byrne, B. & Samuelsson, S. (2014). Why do children differ in their development of reading and related skills? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 38 – 54. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petermann, F. & Petermann, U. (2010). HAWIK-IV. Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Kinder-IV. Bern: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Read, C., Zhang, Y.-F., Nie, H.-Y. & Ding, B.-Q. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24, 31 – 44. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rißling, J.-K., Metz, D., Melzer, J. & Petermann, F. (2011). Langzeiteffekte einer kindergartenbasierten Förderung der phonologischen Bewusstheit. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 20, 229 – 235. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, W., Roth, E. & Ennemoser, M. (2000). Training phonological skills and letter knowledge in children at risk for dyslexia. A comparison of three kindergarten intervention programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 284 – 295. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shapiro, L. R., Carroll, J. M. & Solity, J. E. (2013). Separating the influences of prereading skills on early word and nonword reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 278 – 295. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vaessen, A., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Faísca, L. & Reis, A. et al. (2010). Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 827 – 842. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K. & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities. New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73 – 87. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A. & Burgess, S. R. et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468 – 479. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R. & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition. More consequence than precondition but still important. Cognition, 40, 219 – 249. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H., Landerl, K. & Schneider, W. (1994). The role of rhyme awareness in learning to read a regular orthography. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 469 – 484. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H. & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668 – 680. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wimmer, H. & Mayringer, H. (2002). Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: A specific disability in regular orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 272 – 277. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ziegler, J. C. & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages. A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3 – 29. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar