Abstract
Zusammenfassung. In der Forschungsliteratur besteht Konsens, dass phonologische Bewusstheit ein spezifischer Prädiktor für den Schriftspracherwerb ist. Eine genaue Klärung des reziproken Zusammenhangs zwischen phonologischer Bewusstheit und Lesen liegt bisher allerdings nicht vor, da viele Längsschnittstudien die Lesefähigkeiten zum ersten Messzeitpunkt nicht berücksichtigten. In dieser Arbeit wird untersucht, ob phonologische Bewusstheit Leseleistungen auch dann prädiziert, wenn eine Kontrolle des frühen Lesens erfolgt. An 340 deutschsprachigen Kindern wurden Lesen und phonologische Bewusstheit zu Schuleintritt und am Ende der ersten Klasse erhoben. Ein Strukturgleichungsmodell zeigte, dass unter Berücksichtigung der Lesefähigkeiten am Anfang der ersten Klasse keine signifikante Prädiktion der phonologischen Bewusstheit auf die späteren Leseleistungen vorlag. Die Vorhersagekraft der phonologischen Bewusstheit für spätere Lesefähigkeiten ist offenbar vorwiegend durch frühe Lesekompetenzen erklärbar.
Abstract. There is general consensus that phonological awareness is an important specific predictor of reading development. A more specific clarification of the reciprocal relation between phonological awareness and reading skills is still missing, as most longitudinal studies did not account for reading skills at the first assessment. We investigated whether phonological awareness predicts reading skills when early reading is assessed. Phonological awareness and reading skills were assessed in a sample of 340 German-speaking children at the beginning and the end of Grade 1. A structural equation model showed no prediction of phonological awareness on later reading achievement after controlling for reading skills at school entry. Thus, the prediction of phonological awareness in later reading abilities seems to be mostly explained by early reading skills.
Literatur
2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23, 678 – 686.
(2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77 – 111.
(1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450 – 476.
(2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51 – 77.
(1989). The development of spelling knowledge and its role in reading acquisition and reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 356 – 365.
(2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5 – 21.
(2012). Spezifische Vorläuferfertigkeiten der Lesegeschwindigkeit, des Leseverständnisses und des Rechtschreibens. Evidenz aus zwei Längsschnittstudien vom Kindergarten bis zur 4. Klasse. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 44, 53 – 67.
(2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18, 129 – 155.
(1984). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills: Revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1059 – 1064.
(2011). Datenanalyse mit Mplus. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
(1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
(1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41 – 57.
(2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading: Implications for the assessment of phonological awareness. Clinical Forum, 36, 285 – 293.
(2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 2 – 28.
(2002). Bielefelder Screening zur Früherkennung von Lese-Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2013). Legasthenie–LRS (4., akt. Aufl.). München: Reinhardt.
(2009).
(Lese-/Rechtschreibstörung . In S. SchneiderJ. MargrafHrsg., Lehrbuch der Verhaltenstherapie. Störungen des Kindes- und Jugendalter (S. 395 – 410). Heidelberg: Springer.2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150 – 161.
(2013). Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying consistency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 686 – 694.
(2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing, 15, 653 – 682.
(2010). Diagnostische Merkmale von Screeningverfahren. In M. HasselhornW. SchneiderHrsg., Frühprognose schulischer Kompetenzen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322 – 352.
(2010). SLRT-II Lese- und Rechtschreibtest. Bern: Huber.
(2009). Ran is not a measure of orthographic processing. Evidence from the asymmetric German orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 1 – 25.
(2014). Reading development in European orthographies: Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies. Learning and Instruction, 29, 65 – 77.
(2012). Kognitive Korrelate der Lese-, Leserechtschreib- und der Rechtschreibstörung. Lernen und Lernstörungen, 1, 7 – 19.
(2013). Leseflüssigkeit im Grundschulalter: Entwicklungsverlauf und Effekte systematischer Leseförderung. Lernen und Lernstörungen, 2, 131 – 146.
(2014). Why do children differ in their development of reading and related skills? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 38 – 54.
(2010). HAWIK-IV. Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Kinder-IV. Bern: Huber.
(1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24, 31 – 44.
(2011). Langzeiteffekte einer kindergartenbasierten Förderung der phonologischen Bewusstheit. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 20, 229 – 235.
(2000). Training phonological skills and letter knowledge in children at risk for dyslexia. A comparison of three kindergarten intervention programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 284 – 295.
(2013). Separating the influences of prereading skills on early word and nonword reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 278 – 295.
(2010). Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 827 – 842.
(1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities. New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73 – 87.
(1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468 – 479.
(1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition. More consequence than precondition but still important. Cognition, 40, 219 – 249.
(1994). The role of rhyme awareness in learning to read a regular orthography. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 469 – 484.
(2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 668 – 680.
(2002). Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: A specific disability in regular orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 272 – 277.
(2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages. A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3 – 29.
(