Abstract
Abstract. A survey of 341 undergraduate students (118 males, 223 females) assessed five aggression-related personality characteristics and their relationships to the preference for violent media. Positive relationships were predicted for aggression, impulsivity and sensation seeking with exposure to media violence and negative relationships for empathy and guilt. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed consistent results only for aggression, where significant positive relationships existed with the frequency of consuming violent media. Sex was also found to be a significant moderator of the relationship between sensation seeking, impulsivity, guilt and violent media and suggests that women may derive much different value from media violence. These findings are predicted and interpreted using a selective exposure theory perspective. Generally, the present study suggests that a general predisposition toward anger, hostility and aggression is the best, albeit small, predictor of who chooses to consume media violence.
Zusammenfassung. In einer Fragebogenstudie mit 341 Teilnehmer/inne/n (118 männlich, 223 weiblich) wurden fünf aggressionsbezogene Persönlichkeitseigenschaften und deren Relation zur Präferenz für gewalthaltige Medienangebote erfasst. Es wurde vermutet, dass die Präferenz für gewalthaltige Medienangebote positiv mit Aggressivität, Impulsivität und sensation seeking und negativ mit Empathie und Schuld korreliert. Hierarchische Regressionsanalysen ergeben jedoch nur für Aggressivität konsistent hypothesenkonforme Ergebnisse: Es zeigen sich signifikante positive Beziehungen zwischen Aggressivität und der Häufigkeit des Konsums gewalthaltiger Medienangebote. Das Geschlecht erweist sich ebenfalls als signifikanter Moderator der Beziehung zwischen sensation seeking, Impulsivität, Schuld und dem Konsum gewalthaltiger Medienangebote. Diese Ergebnisse lassen vermuten, dass gewalthaltige Medienangebote für Frauen einen ganz anderen Wert besitzen als für Männer. Als theoretischer Rahmen der Untersuchung (sowohl bei der Herleitung der Hypothesen als auch bei der Interpretation der Befunde) dient die selective exposure-Theorie. Insgesamt legt die vorliegende Studie nahe, dass eine generelle Disposition für Wut, Feindseligkeit und Aggression zwar ein schwacher, aber dennoch der beste Prädiktor für die Entscheidung zum Konsum gewalthaltiger Medienangebote ist.
References
1978). The effect of tv viewing on the educational performance of elementary school children. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 24, 156– 163
(2003). Anxiety and impulsivity levels identify relevant subtypes in adolescents with at-risk behavior. Journal of Affective Disorders, 74, 219– 227
(1985). Informational utility and selective exposure to entertainment media. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 63-91). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
(1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis . Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall
(1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364– 374
(1998). Aggression and the self: High self-esteem, low self control, and ego threat. In R. G. Geen & E. E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 111-137). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
(1984). Some effects of thoughts on anti- and prosocial influences of media events: A cognitive-neoassociation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 410– 427
(2005). Thinking hard about viewing: Testing the relationship between need for cognition and television viewing . Unpublished manuscript
(1974). Stimulation seeking and the change seeker index. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 311–
(1984). Neuropsychological deficits, learning disability, and violent behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 323– 324
(1990). Role of cognitive-emotional mediators and individual differences in the effects of media violence on aggression. Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 56– 163
(1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452– 459
(1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116– 131
(1997). Predictors of children’s interest in violent television programs. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 155– 167
(2003). Impulsivity and verbal deficits associated with domestic violence. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 760– 770
(1999). Television: What’s on, who’s watching, and what it means . San Diego, CA: Academic Press
(1991). Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation. Communication Research, 18, 443– 463
(1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113– 126
(1980). Adolescent aggression and television. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 347, 319– 331
(1979). Media violence and catharsis in college females. Journal of Social Psychology, 109, 307– 308
(1979). Does aggression cause a preference for viewing media violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2307– 2317
(1975). The effect of anger on preference for filmed violence . Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL
(2001). Psychological escapism: Predicting the amount of television viewing by need for cognition. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 100– 120
(2003). Executive cognitive functioning and aggression: Is it an issue of impulsivity?. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 15– 30
(1995). Impulsivity and aggression . West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
(2003). Do subtypes of martially violent men continue to differ over time?. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 71, 728– 740
(1982). Television violence and aggressive behavior. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of programs and implications for the 80’s (pp. 126-137). Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office
(1986). Psychological processes promoting the relation between exposure to media violence and aggressive behavior by the viewer. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 125– 139
(2003). The aggression paradox: Understanding links among aggression, sensation seeking, and the consideration of future consequences. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 1287– 1302
(2000). The guilt inventory. Psychological Reports, 87, 1039– 1042
(1997). The variable influence of audience activity on media effects. Communication Research, 24, 107– 135
(1999). Predicting exposure to and uses of television violence. Journal of Communication, 29, 24– 45
(2005). Uses and gratifications of media violence: Personality correlates of viewing and liking violent genres. Media Psychology, 7, 399– 420
(1984). Pornography and sexual aggression . NY: Academic Press
(1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 324– 344
(2003). Reality-based television programming and the psychology of its appeal. Media Psychology, 5, 303– 330
(2003). Rethinking empathy. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen & J. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion (pp. 107-130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
(2000). Reducing the aggression-promoting effect of violent cartoons by increasing children’s fictional involvement with the victim. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 125– 142
(2002). Crime type and specific personality indicia: Cloninger’s TCI impulsivity, empathy and attachment subscales in non-violent, violent and sexual offenders. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 20, 23– 56
(1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19, 315– 342
(1994). The effects of television violence on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 21, 516– 546
(1995). Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768– 774
(1985). Sensation-seeking and selection of entertainment. Personality & Individual Differences, 6, 599– 603
(1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 321– 325
(2003). Alienation, aggression, and sensation seeking as predictors of adolescent use of violent film, computer, and website content. Journal of Communication, 53, 105– 121
(2003). Popular video games: Quantifying the presentation of violence and its context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 58– 76
(1998). National television violence study, vol. 3 . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
(1984). Developmental differences in emotional responses to a frightening transformation of character in a television program . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI
(1987). Predictors of horror film attendance and appeal: An analysis of the audience for frightening films. Communication Research, 14, 415– 436
(1990). Reacting to graphic horror: A model of empathy and emotional behavior. Communication Research, 17, 616– 640
(1996). Horror films: Current research on audience preferences and reactions . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
(1985). Measuring exposure to television. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 35-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
(1991). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 135-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
(1984). Effects of massive exposure to pornography. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and sexual aggression (pp. 15-138). NY: Academic Press
(1985). Selective-exposure phenomena. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 1-10). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
(1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal . NY: Erlbaum
(1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking . NY: Cambridge University Press
(1986). Personality and curiosity about morbid and sexual events. Personality & Individual Differences, 7, 49– 56
(