Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6383.18.3.119

Abstract. A survey of 341 undergraduate students (118 males, 223 females) assessed five aggression-related personality characteristics and their relationships to the preference for violent media. Positive relationships were predicted for aggression, impulsivity and sensation seeking with exposure to media violence and negative relationships for empathy and guilt. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed consistent results only for aggression, where significant positive relationships existed with the frequency of consuming violent media. Sex was also found to be a significant moderator of the relationship between sensation seeking, impulsivity, guilt and violent media and suggests that women may derive much different value from media violence. These findings are predicted and interpreted using a selective exposure theory perspective. Generally, the present study suggests that a general predisposition toward anger, hostility and aggression is the best, albeit small, predictor of who chooses to consume media violence.


Aggressionsbezogene Persönlichkeitseigenschaften und der Konsum gewalthaltiger Medienangebote

Zusammenfassung. In einer Fragebogenstudie mit 341 Teilnehmer/inne/n (118 männlich, 223 weiblich) wurden fünf aggressionsbezogene Persönlichkeitseigenschaften und deren Relation zur Präferenz für gewalthaltige Medienangebote erfasst. Es wurde vermutet, dass die Präferenz für gewalthaltige Medienangebote positiv mit Aggressivität, Impulsivität und sensation seeking und negativ mit Empathie und Schuld korreliert. Hierarchische Regressionsanalysen ergeben jedoch nur für Aggressivität konsistent hypothesenkonforme Ergebnisse: Es zeigen sich signifikante positive Beziehungen zwischen Aggressivität und der Häufigkeit des Konsums gewalthaltiger Medienangebote. Das Geschlecht erweist sich ebenfalls als signifikanter Moderator der Beziehung zwischen sensation seeking, Impulsivität, Schuld und dem Konsum gewalthaltiger Medienangebote. Diese Ergebnisse lassen vermuten, dass gewalthaltige Medienangebote für Frauen einen ganz anderen Wert besitzen als für Männer. Als theoretischer Rahmen der Untersuchung (sowohl bei der Herleitung der Hypothesen als auch bei der Interpretation der Befunde) dient die selective exposure-Theorie. Insgesamt legt die vorliegende Studie nahe, dass eine generelle Disposition für Wut, Feindseligkeit und Aggression zwar ein schwacher, aber dennoch der beste Prädiktor für die Entscheidung zum Konsum gewalthaltiger Medienangebote ist.

References

  • Anderson, C. C., Mcguire, T. O. (1978). The effect of tv viewing on the educational performance of elementary school children. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 24, 156– 163 Google Scholar

  • Askenazy, F. L., Sorci, K., Benoit, M., Lestideau, K., Myquel, M., Lecrubier, Y. (2003). Anxiety and impulsivity levels identify relevant subtypes in adolescents with at-risk behavior. Journal of Affective Disorders, 74, 219– 227 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Atkin, C. K. (1985). Informational utility and selective exposure to entertainment media. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 63-91). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis . Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall Google Scholar

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364– 374 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baumeister, R. F., Boden, J. M. (1998). Aggression and the self: High self-esteem, low self control, and ego threat. In R. G. Geen & E. E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 111-137). San Diego, CA: Academic Press CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berkowitz, L. (1984). Some effects of thoughts on anti- and prosocial influences of media events: A cognitive-neoassociation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 410– 427 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boyson, A. R. (2005). Thinking hard about viewing: Testing the relationship between need for cognition and television viewing . Unpublished manuscript Google Scholar

  • Brown, L. T., Ruder, V. G., Ruder, J. H., Young, S. D. (1974). Stimulation seeking and the change seeker index. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 311– CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bryant, E. T., Scott, M. L., Golden, C. J., Tori, C. D. (1984). Neuropsychological deficits, learning disability, and violent behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 323– 324 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bushman, B. J., Geen, R. G. (1990). Role of cognitive-emotional mediators and individual differences in the effects of media violence on aggression. Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 56– 163 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buss, A. H., Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452– 459 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116– 131 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cantor, J., Nathanson, A. I. (1997). Predictors of children’s interest in violent television programs. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 155– 167 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, R. A., Brumm, V., Zawacki, T. M., Paul, R., Sweet, L., Rosenbaum, A. (2003). Impulsivity and verbal deficits associated with domestic violence. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 760– 770 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Comstock, G., Scharrer, E. (1999). Television: What’s on, who’s watching, and what it means . San Diego, CA: Academic Press Google Scholar

  • Conway, J. C., Rubin, A. M. (1991). Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation. Communication Research, 18, 443– 463 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113– 126 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eron, L. D., Huesmann, L. (1980). Adolescent aggression and television. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 347, 319– 331 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fehr, L. A. (1979). Media violence and catharsis in college females. Journal of Social Psychology, 109, 307– 308 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fenigstein, A. (1979). Does aggression cause a preference for viewing media violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2307– 2317 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Freedman, J., Newtson, R. (1975). The effect of anger on preference for filmed violence . Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL Google Scholar

  • Henning, B., Vorderer, P. (2001). Psychological escapism: Predicting the amount of television viewing by need for cognition. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 100– 120 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoaken, P. N. S., Shaughnessy, V. K., Pihl, R. O. (2003). Executive cognitive functioning and aggression: Is it an issue of impulsivity?. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 15– 30 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hollander, E., Stein, D. (1995). Impulsivity and aggression . West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd Google Scholar

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., Stuart, G. L. (2003). Do subtypes of martially violent men continue to differ over time?. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 71, 728– 740 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huesmann, L. R. (1982). Television violence and aggressive behavior. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of programs and implications for the 80’s (pp. 126-137). Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office Google Scholar

  • Huesmann, L. R. (1986). Psychological processes promoting the relation between exposure to media violence and aggressive behavior by the viewer. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 125– 139 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Joireman, J., Anderson, J., Strathman, A. (2003). The aggression paradox: Understanding links among aggression, sensation seeking, and the consideration of future consequences. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 1287– 1302 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jones, W. H., Schratter, A. K., Kugler, K. (2000). The guilt inventory. Psychological Reports, 87, 1039– 1042 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, J., Rubin, A. M. (1997). The variable influence of audience activity on media effects. Communication Research, 24, 107– 135 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krcmar, M., Greene, K. (1999). Predicting exposure to and uses of television violence. Journal of Communication, 29, 24– 45 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krcmar, M., Kean, L. G. (2005). Uses and gratifications of media violence: Personality correlates of viewing and liking violent genres. Media Psychology, 7, 399– 420 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Malamuth, N. M., Donnerstein, E. (Eds.) (1984). Pornography and sexual aggression . NY: Academic Press Google Scholar

  • Miller, P. A., Eisenberg, N. (1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 324– 344 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nabi, R. L., Biely, E. N., Morgan, S. J., Stitt, C. R. (2003). Reality-based television programming and the psychology of its appeal. Media Psychology, 5, 303– 330 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nathanson, A. I. (2003). Rethinking empathy. In J. Bryant, D. Roskos-Ewoldsen & J. Cantor (Eds.), Communication and emotion (pp. 107-130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Google Scholar

  • Nathanson, A. I., Cantor, J. (2000). Reducing the aggression-promoting effect of violent cartoons by increasing children’s fictional involvement with the victim. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44, 125– 142 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nussbaum, D., Collins, M., Cutler, J., Zimmerman, W., Farguson, B., Jacques, I. (2002). Crime type and specific personality indicia: Cloninger’s TCI impulsivity, empathy and attachment subscales in non-violent, violent and sexual offenders. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 20, 23– 56 Google Scholar

  • Oliver, M. B. (1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19, 315– 342 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paik, H., Comstock, G. (1994). The effects of television violence on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 21, 516– 546 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S., Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768– 774 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schierman, M. J., Rowland, G. L. (1985). Sensation-seeking and selection of entertainment. Personality & Individual Differences, 6, 599– 603 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scott, W. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 321– 325 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Slater, M. D. (2003). Alienation, aggression, and sensation seeking as predictors of adolescent use of violent film, computer, and website content. Journal of Communication, 53, 105– 121 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, S. L., Lachlan, K., Tamborini, R. (2003). Popular video games: Quantifying the presentation of violence and its context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 58– 76 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, S. L., Wilson, B. J., Kunkel, D., Linz, D., Potter, W. J., Colvin, C. M., Donnerstein, E. (1998). National television violence study, vol. 3 . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Google Scholar

  • Sparks, G. G. (1984). Developmental differences in emotional responses to a frightening transformation of character in a television program . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI Google Scholar

  • Tamborini, R., Stiff, J. (1987). Predictors of horror film attendance and appeal: An analysis of the audience for frightening films. Communication Research, 14, 415– 436 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tamborini, R., Stiff, J., Heidel, C. (1990). Reacting to graphic horror: A model of empathy and emotional behavior. Communication Research, 17, 616– 640 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weaver, J. B., Tamborini, R. (Eds.) (1996). Horror films: Current research on audience preferences and reactions . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Google Scholar

  • Webster, J. G., Wakshlag, J. (1985). Measuring exposure to television. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 35-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Google Scholar

  • Zillmann, D. (1991). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 135-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Google Scholar

  • Zillmann, D., Bryant, J. (1984). Effects of massive exposure to pornography. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and sexual aggression (pp. 15-138). NY: Academic Press CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zillmann, D., Bryant, J. (1985). Selective-exposure phenomena. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 1-10). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Google Scholar

  • Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal . NY: Erlbaum Google Scholar

  • Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking . NY: Cambridge University Press Google Scholar

  • Zuckerman, M., Litle, P. (1986). Personality and curiosity about morbid and sexual events. Personality & Individual Differences, 7, 49– 56 CrossrefGoogle Scholar