Skip to main content
Original Articles

Validity of the Structured Interview for the Assessment of Type A Behavior Pattern

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.15.1.39

Summary: This is an analysis of a Spanish version of the Structured Interview (SI) employing a sample of 486 males, predominantly manual workers. The subjects are grouped into three subsamples: coronary heart patients, heart patients without coronary disease, and healthy people. SI questions are coded for contents on a 5-point scale. Frequency of specific Type A speech characteristics and clinical judgments are rated on the same scale. Factor Analysis resulted in four factors: Competitiveness and Pressured Drive, Clinical Ratings, Expression of Anger, and Speed-Impatience. The first factor differentiated between heart disease patients (coronary and noncoronary) and healthy people; the third factor showed the dissimilarities between coronary patients on the one hand, and noncoronary patients and healthy people on the other. Finally, the Global or Type A Scale also distinguished heart patients, both coronary and noncoronary, from healthy people.

References

References

  • Anderson, J. R. Meininger, J. C. (1993). Component analysis of the Structured Interview for assessment of Type A behavior in employed women. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 371– 385 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Booth-Kewley, S. Friedman, H. S. (1987). Psychological predictors of heart disease: A quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 343– 362 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, D. G. Rosenman, R. H. Schiller, E. Chesney, M. A. (1985). Consistency and variation among instruments purporting to measure the type A behavior pattern. Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 242– 261 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chesney, M. A. Eagleston, J. R. Rosenman, R. H. (1980). The type A structured interview: A behavioral assessment in the rough. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 2, 255– 272 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chesney, M. A. Hecker, M. H. L. Black, G. W. (1988). Coronary-prone components of Type A Behavior in the WCGS: A new methodology. In B. K. Houston, & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Type A Behavior Pattern. Research, theory and intervention (pp. 168-211). New York: Wiley & Sons First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. B. Syme, S. L. Jenkins, C. D. Kagan, A. Zyzanski, S. J. (1979). Cultural context of Type A Behavior and risk for CHD: A study of japanese american males. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2, 375– 384 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dembroski, T. M. MacDougall, J. M. (1983). Behavioral and psychophysiological perspectives on coronary-prone behavior. In T. M. Dembroski, J. J. Schmidt, & G. Blumchen (Eds.), Biobehavioral bases of coronary heart disease (pp. 106-129). Switzerland: Karger First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dielman, T. E. Butchart, A. T. Moss, G. E. Harrison, R. V. Harlan, W. R. Horvath, W. J. (1987). Psychometric properties of component and global measures of Structured Interview assessed Type A Behavior in a population sample. Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 458– 469 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dielman, T. E. Butchart, A. T. Moss, G. E. (1990). Demographic differences in the relationships among components and global rating of structured interview assessed Type A Behavior in a population sample. In M. J. Strube (Ed.), Type A behavior (special issue) Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 233– 261 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1985). Personality, cancer and cardiovascular disease: A causal analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 535– 556 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friedman, M. (1989). Diagnosis and treatment of Type A Behavior as a medical disorder. Primary Cardiology, 15, 68– 77 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Friedman, M. Rosenman, R. H. (1959). Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings. Journal of American Medical Association, 169, 1286– 1296 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haney, T. L. Maynard, K. E. Houseworth, S. J. Scherwitz, L. W. Williams, R. B. Barefoot, J. C. (1996). Interpersonal hostility assessment technique: Description and validation against the criterion of coronary artery disease. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 386– 401 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haynes, S. G. Matthews, K. A. (1988). The association of type A Behavior with cardiovascular disease. Update and critical review. In B. K. Houston, & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Type A Behavior Pattern. Research, theory and intervention (pp. 51-82). New York: Wiley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hecker, M. H. L. Chesney, M. A. Black, G. W. Frautschi, N. (1988). Coronary-prone behaviors in the Western Collaborative Group Study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50, 153– 164 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jenkins, C. D. Zyzanski, S. J. (1982). The Type A Behavior Pattern is alive and well when not dissected: A reply. The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 55, 219– 223 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matthews, K. A. (1988). Coronary heart disease and Type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman (1987). Quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 373– 380 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matthews, K. A. Glass, D. C. Rosenman, R. H. Bortner, R. W. (1977). Competitive drive, pattern A and coronary heart disease: A further analysis of some data from the Western Collaborative Group Study. Journal of Chronic Disease, 30, 489– 498 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matthews, K. A. Krantz, D. S. Dembroski, T. M. MacDougall, J. M. (1982). Unique and common variance in Structured Interview and JAS measures of the Type A Behavior Pattern. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 303– 313 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McLellarn, R. W. Bornstein, Ph. H. Carmody, T. P. (1986). A methodological critique of the Structured-Interview assessment of Type A Behavior. Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, 6, 21– 25 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, T. Q. Turner, Ch. W. Tindale, R. S. Posavac, E. J. Dugoni, B. L. (1991). Reasons for the trend toward null findings in research on Type A Behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 469– 485 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Palmer, K. J. Langeluddecke, P. M. Jones, M. Tennant, C. (1992). The relation of the Type A Behavior Pattern, factors of the Structured Interview, and anger to survival after myocardial infarction. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44, 13– 19 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • del Pino, A. Gaos, M. T. Dorta, R. (1995). Validez criterial del Inventario de Actividad de Jenkins (JAS) en una muestra de varones canarios. Psicothema, 7, 283– 296 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenman, R. H. (1978). The interview method of assessment of the coronary-prone behavior pattern. In T. M. Dembroski, S. M. Weiss, J. L. Shields, S. Haynes, & A. M. Feinleib (Eds.), Coronary-prone behavior (pp. 55-69). New York: Springer-Verlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenman, R. H. (1986). Current and past history of Type A Behavior Pattern. In T. H. Schmidt, T. M. Dembroski, & G. Blümchen (Eds.), Biological and psychological factors in cardiovascular disease (pp. 15-40). New York: Springer-Verlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenman, R. H. (1991). Type A Behavior Pattern and coronary heart disease: The hostility factor?. Stress Medicine, 7, 245– 253 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenman, R. H. (1993). Relationships of the Type A Behavior Pattern with coronary artery disease. In L. Goldberger, & S. Breznitz, (Eds.), Handbook of stress. Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed., pp. 449-476). New York: The Free Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenman, R. H. Friedman, M. Strauss, R. Wurm, M. Kositchek, R. Hahn, W. Werthessen, N. (1964). A predictive study of coronary heart disease: The Western Collaborative Group Study. Journal of American Medical Association, 189, 15– 22 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherwitz, L. (1989). Type A Behavior assessment in the Structured Interview: Review, critique, and recommendations. In A. W. Siegman & T. M. Dembroski (Eds.), In search of coronary-prone behavior: Beyond Type A (pp. 117-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, R. B. Barefoot, J. C. Haney, Th. L. Harrell, F. E. Blumenthal, J. A. Prior, D. B. Peterson, B. (1988). Type A Behavior and angiographically documented coronary atherosclerosis in a sample of 2,289 patients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50, 139– 152 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, L. (1992). Are the physical and TABP risk factors for heart disease unique to CHD. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 705– 710 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar