Abstract
Summary: This is an analysis of a Spanish version of the Structured Interview (SI) employing a sample of 486 males, predominantly manual workers. The subjects are grouped into three subsamples: coronary heart patients, heart patients without coronary disease, and healthy people. SI questions are coded for contents on a 5-point scale. Frequency of specific Type A speech characteristics and clinical judgments are rated on the same scale. Factor Analysis resulted in four factors: Competitiveness and Pressured Drive, Clinical Ratings, Expression of Anger, and Speed-Impatience. The first factor differentiated between heart disease patients (coronary and noncoronary) and healthy people; the third factor showed the dissimilarities between coronary patients on the one hand, and noncoronary patients and healthy people on the other. Finally, the Global or Type A Scale also distinguished heart patients, both coronary and noncoronary, from healthy people.
References
References
Anderson, J. R. Meininger, J. C. (1993). Component analysis of the Structured Interview for assessment of Type A behavior in employed women. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 371– 385Booth-Kewley, S. Friedman, H. S. (1987). Psychological predictors of heart disease: A quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 343– 362Byrne, D. G. Rosenman, R. H. Schiller, E. Chesney, M. A. (1985). Consistency and variation among instruments purporting to measure the type A behavior pattern. Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 242– 261Chesney, M. A. Eagleston, J. R. Rosenman, R. H. (1980). The type A structured interview: A behavioral assessment in the rough. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 2, 255– 272Chesney, M. A. Hecker, M. H. L. Black, G. W. (1988). Coronary-prone components of Type A Behavior in the WCGS: A new methodology. In B. K. Houston, & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Type A Behavior Pattern. Research, theory and intervention (pp. 168-211). New York: Wiley & SonsCohen, J. B. Syme, S. L. Jenkins, C. D. Kagan, A. Zyzanski, S. J. (1979). Cultural context of Type A Behavior and risk for CHD: A study of japanese american males. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2, 375– 384Dembroski, T. M. MacDougall, J. M. (1983). Behavioral and psychophysiological perspectives on coronary-prone behavior. In T. M. Dembroski, J. J. Schmidt, & G. Blumchen (Eds.), Biobehavioral bases of coronary heart disease (pp. 106-129). Switzerland: KargerDielman, T. E. Butchart, A. T. Moss, G. E. Harrison, R. V. Harlan, W. R. Horvath, W. J. (1987). Psychometric properties of component and global measures of Structured Interview assessed Type A Behavior in a population sample. Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 458– 469Dielman, T. E. Butchart, A. T. Moss, G. E. (1990). Demographic differences in the relationships among components and global rating of structured interview assessed Type A Behavior in a population sample. In M. J. Strube (Ed.), Type A behavior (special issue) Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 233– 261Eysenck, H. J. (1985). Personality, cancer and cardiovascular disease: A causal analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 535– 556Friedman, M. (1989). Diagnosis and treatment of Type A Behavior as a medical disorder. Primary Cardiology, 15, 68– 77Friedman, M. Rosenman, R. H. (1959). Association of specific overt behavior pattern with blood and cardiovascular findings. Journal of American Medical Association, 169, 1286– 1296Haney, T. L. Maynard, K. E. Houseworth, S. J. Scherwitz, L. W. Williams, R. B. Barefoot, J. C. (1996). Interpersonal hostility assessment technique: Description and validation against the criterion of coronary artery disease. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 386– 401Haynes, S. G. Matthews, K. A. (1988). The association of type A Behavior with cardiovascular disease. Update and critical review. In B. K. Houston, & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Type A Behavior Pattern. Research, theory and intervention (pp. 51-82). New York: WileyHecker, M. H. L. Chesney, M. A. Black, G. W. Frautschi, N. (1988). Coronary-prone behaviors in the Western Collaborative Group Study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50, 153– 164Jenkins, C. D. Zyzanski, S. J. (1982). The Type A Behavior Pattern is alive and well when not dissected: A reply. The British Journal of Medical Psychology, 55, 219– 223Matthews, K. A. (1988). Coronary heart disease and Type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman (1987). Quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 373– 380Matthews, K. A. Glass, D. C. Rosenman, R. H. Bortner, R. W. (1977). Competitive drive, pattern A and coronary heart disease: A further analysis of some data from the Western Collaborative Group Study. Journal of Chronic Disease, 30, 489– 498Matthews, K. A. Krantz, D. S. Dembroski, T. M. MacDougall, J. M. (1982). Unique and common variance in Structured Interview and JAS measures of the Type A Behavior Pattern. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 303– 313McLellarn, R. W. Bornstein, Ph. H. Carmody, T. P. (1986). A methodological critique of the Structured-Interview assessment of Type A Behavior. Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, 6, 21– 25Miller, T. Q. Turner, Ch. W. Tindale, R. S. Posavac, E. J. Dugoni, B. L. (1991). Reasons for the trend toward null findings in research on Type A Behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 469– 485Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-HillPalmer, K. J. Langeluddecke, P. M. Jones, M. Tennant, C. (1992). The relation of the Type A Behavior Pattern, factors of the Structured Interview, and anger to survival after myocardial infarction. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44, 13– 19del Pino, A. Gaos, M. T. Dorta, R. (1995). Validez criterial del Inventario de Actividad de Jenkins (JAS) en una muestra de varones canarios. Psicothema, 7, 283– 296Rosenman, R. H. (1978). The interview method of assessment of the coronary-prone behavior pattern. In T. M. Dembroski, S. M. Weiss, J. L. Shields, S. Haynes, & A. M. Feinleib (Eds.), Coronary-prone behavior (pp. 55-69). New York: Springer-VerlagRosenman, R. H. (1986). Current and past history of Type A Behavior Pattern. In T. H. Schmidt, T. M. Dembroski, & G. Blümchen (Eds.), Biological and psychological factors in cardiovascular disease (pp. 15-40). New York: Springer-VerlagRosenman, R. H. (1991). Type A Behavior Pattern and coronary heart disease: The hostility factor?. Stress Medicine, 7, 245– 253Rosenman, R. H. (1993). Relationships of the Type A Behavior Pattern with coronary artery disease. In L. Goldberger, & S. Breznitz, (Eds.), Handbook of stress. Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed., pp. 449-476). New York: The Free PressRosenman, R. H. Friedman, M. Strauss, R. Wurm, M. Kositchek, R. Hahn, W. Werthessen, N. (1964). A predictive study of coronary heart disease: The Western Collaborative Group Study. Journal of American Medical Association, 189, 15– 22Scherwitz, L. (1989). Type A Behavior assessment in the Structured Interview: Review, critique, and recommendations. In A. W. Siegman & T. M. Dembroski (Eds.), In search of coronary-prone behavior: Beyond Type A (pp. 117-147). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumWilliams, R. B. Barefoot, J. C. Haney, Th. L. Harrell, F. E. Blumenthal, J. A. Prior, D. B. Peterson, B. (1988). Type A Behavior and angiographically documented coronary atherosclerosis in a sample of 2,289 patients. Psychosomatic Medicine, 50, 139– 152Wright, L. (1992). Are the physical and TABP risk factors for heart disease unique to CHD. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 705– 710