Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.16.2.115

Summary: This contribution investigates the psychometric properties of two scales for measuring family cohesion and mother-daughter attachment. The scales were administered to 206 adult female subjects on three occasions of measurement 9 months apart. Various single-construct latent state-trait models with and without method factors were tested against the data and compared to each other. The most parsimonious version of a latent state-trait model with method factors was found to fit the data best for both constructs. The parameter estimates of this model reveal (1) that both scales are very reliable, (2) that they measure stable traits, (3) that test halves (formed by randomly splitting items) are not strictly parallel, but have their own test half-specific (method) factors, and (4) that the test scores vary across time due to systematic effects of the situation at the occasion of measurement. The last result indicates that the scales measure not only cohesion and attachment traits, but also cohesion and attachment states. In a second series of analyses, the two single-construct models were combined to a multi-construct latent state-trait model in order to determine the correlation of the latent traits and the correlations between the latent state residuals of the two constructs within the same occasion of measurement. The correlation between the two traits amounted to .61 and was considerably higher than the correlations between the corresponding manifest variables. Furthermore, the within-occasion correlations of the latent state residuals are substantial, indicating that the occasion-specific effects influenced the measures of both constructs in the same direction, i. e., attachment and cohesion states fluctuate synchronously across time.

References

References

  • Cierpka, M. (1987). Familiendiagnostik [Family assessment]. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cicirelli, V.G. (1983). Adult children's attachment and helping behavior to elderly parents: A path model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 815– 825 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cicirelli, V.G. (1990). Adult children's help to aging parents: Attachment and altruism. In L. Montada & H.W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Altruism in social systems (pp. 41-57). Toronto: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Engfer, A. Schneewind, K.A. Hinderer, J. (1977). Die Familien-Klima-Salen (FKS). Ein Fragebogen zur Erhebung perzipierter Familienumwelten nach R.H. Moos [Family Climate Scales (FCS). A questionnaire for assessing the perceived family environment according to R.H. Moos]. München: Universität München First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Epstein, N.B. Baldwin, L.M. Bishop, D.S. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 171– 180 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harvey, O.J. Gore, E.J. Frank, H. Batres, A.R. (1997). Relationship of shame and guilt to gender and parenting practices. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 135– 146 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hoffmann, M.L. Salzstein, H.D. (1967). Parent discipline and the child's moral development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 45– 57 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide . Chicago: Scientific Software International First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kreuzer, C. Montada, L. (1983). Vorhersage der Befriedigung wahrgenommener Bedürfnisse der eigenen Eltern: Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie [Predicting when perceived needs of aging parents are met by their adult children: Results from a pilot study]. Trier: Universität Trier First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Montada, L. Schmitt, M. Dalbert, C. (1990). Prosocial commitments in the family: Situational, personality, and systemic factors. In L. Montada & H.W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Altruism in social systems (pp. 177-203). Toronto: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Moos, R.H. (1974a). Family Environment Scale (FES). Preliminary manual . Palo Alto: Social Ecology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Olson, D.H. Sprenkle, D.H. Russell, C.S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18, 3– 28 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. Dalbert, C. Montada, L. (1982). Interpersonale Verantwortlichkeit erwachsener Töchter ihren Müttern gegenüber: Rekrutierung der Ausgangsstichprobe, Erhebungs-instrumente in erster Version und Untersuchungsplan [Filial responsibility of adult daughters toward their mothers: Item analyses and reliability analyses. Initial measurement]. Trier: Universität Trier First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. Dalbert, C. Montada, L. (1983). Interpersonale Verantwortlichkeit erwachsener Töchter ihren Müttern gegenüber: Ergebnisse der Item- und Skalenanalysen (erster Untersuchungszeitraum) [Filial responsibility of adult daughters toward their mothers: Sample, assessment instruments, and design]. Trier: Universität Trier First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneewind, K.A. Beckmann, M. Engfer, A. (1982). Eltern und Kinder [Parents and children]. Stuttgart: Klett First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schneewind, K.A. Ruppert, S. Harrow, J. (1998). Personality and family development: An intergenerational comparison . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shadish, W. Montgomery, L.M. Wilson, P. Wilson, M.R. Bright, I. Okwumabua, T. (1993). Effects of family and marital psychotherapy. A metanalysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 992– 1002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steyer, R. (1987). Konsistenz und Spezifität: Definition zweier zentraler Begriffe der Differentiellen Psychologie und ein einfaches Modell zu ihrer Identifikation [Consistency and specificity: Definition of two central concepts in personality and individual differences and a simple model for their identification]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 8, 245– 258 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steyer, R. Ferring, D. Schmitt, M. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2, 79– 98 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steyer, R. Schmitt, M. (1990). The effects of aggregation across and within-occasions on consistency, specificity, and reliability. Methodika, 4, 58– 94 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Trudewind, C. (1982). The development of achievement motivation and individual differences: Ecological determinants. In W.W. Hartup (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 6, pp. 669-703). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar