Handwriting Analysis and Personality Assessment
Abstract
It has been estimated that graphology is used by over 80% of European companies as part of their personnel recruitment process. And yet, after over three decades of research into the validity of graphology as a means of assessing personality, we are left with a legacy of equivocal results. For every experiment that has provided evidence to show that graphologists are able to identify personality traits from features of handwriting, there are just as many to show that, under rigorously controlled conditions, graphologists perform no better than chance expectations. In light of this confusion, this paper takes a different approach to the subject by focusing on the rationale and modus operandi of graphology. When we take a closer look at the academic literature, we note that there is no discussion of the actual rules by which graphologists make their assessments of personality from handwriting samples. Examination of these rules reveals a practice founded upon analogy, symbolism, and metaphor in the absence of empirical studies that have established the associations between particular features of handwriting and personality traits proposed by graphologists. These rules guide both popular graphology and that practiced by professional graphologists in personnel selection.
References
References
Alley, T.R. Ed (1988). Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces. . New Jersey: Erlbaum.Beyerstein, B.L. Beyerstein, D.F. Eds (1992). The write stuff. . Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.Beyerstein, B.L. (1992). The origins of graphology in sympathetic magic.. In B.L. Beyerstein & D.F. Beyerstein (Eds.), The write stuff (pp. 269-341). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.Bruchon-Schweitzer, M. Ferrieux, D. (1991). Les methodes d'evaluation du personnel utilisees pour le recrutement en France [Personnel evaluation methods used for recruitment in France].. L'orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 20, 71– 88Cox, J. Tapsell, J. (1991). Graphology and its validity in personnel assessment. . Paper presented at the Occupational Psychology Conference of the British Psychological Society, Cardiff. Cited in British Psychological Society (1993). The validity of graphology in personnel assessment. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.Crepieux-Jamin, J. (1909). L'ecriture et le caractere. . Paris: Alcan.Crumbaugh, J.C. Stockholm, E. (1977). Validation of graphoanalysis by global or holistic method.. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 403– 410 1978-02382-001Davey, D.M. (1989). How to be a good judge of character: Methods of assessing ability and personality. . London: Kogan Page.Dean, G.A. (1992). The bottom line: Effect size.. In B.L. Beyerstein & D.F. Beyerstein (Eds.), The write stuff (pp. 163-202). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.Dickson, D.H. Kelly, I.W. (1985). The “Barnum effect” in personality assessment: A review of the literature.. Psychological Reports, 57, 367– 382 1987-01130-001Edwards, A.G.P. Armitage, P. (1992). An experiment to test the discriminating ability of graphologists.. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 69– 74 1992-19827-001Eysenck, H.J. Gudjonsson, G. (1986). An empirical study of the validity of handwriting analysis.. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 263– 4 1987-10248-001Fowler, A. (1991, March). An even-handed approach to graphology.. Personnel Management, 40– 43Furnham, A. Gunter, B. (1987). Graphology and personality: Another failure to validate graphological analysis.. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 433– 435 1988-23456-001Gardener, M. (1957). Fads and fallacies in the name of science. . New York: Dover.Graumann, H.M. (1983). History and principles of graphology.. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 47, 242– 52 1984-07312-001Gullan-Whur, M. (1993). What your handwriting reveals. . London: Diamond Books.Hartford, H. (1973). You are what you write. . New York: Macmillan.Klages, L. (1917). Handschrift und Charakter: Gemeinverständlicher Abriss der Graphologischen Technik [Handwriting and character].. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.Klages, L. (1930). Graphologisches Lesebuch [A graphology reader].. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.Klimoski, R.J. Rafaeli, A. (1983). Inferring personal qualities through handwriting analysis.. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56, 191– 202 1984-03601-001Lavell, P. (1994). Taking note of handwriting.. Solicitors Journal, 3rd June, 36– 38Lemke, E.A. Kirchner, J.H. (1971). A multivariate study of handwriting, intelligence, and personality correlates.. Journal of Personality Assessment, 35, 584– 592 1972-10876-001Lester, D. Mclaughlin, S. Nosal, G. (1977). Graphological signs for extroversion.. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 137– 8 1977-29585-001Levy, L. (1979). Handwriting and hiring.. Dun's Review, 113, 72– 79Lewinson, T.S. (1986). The classic schools of graphology.. In B. Nevo (Ed.), Scientific aspects of graphology (pp. 4-46). Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.Lindauer, M. (1990). The meanings of the physiognomic stimuli taketa and maluma .. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 47– 50 1990-16193-001Lundholm, H. (1921). The affective tone of lines: Experimental researches.. Psychological Review, 28, 43– 60 1926-05225-001Lynch, B. (1985, March). Graphology: Toward a hand-picked workforce.. Personnel Management, 14– 18Marne, P. (1980). Graphology. . Kent: Hodder & Stoughton.Michon, J.H. (1872). Sisteme de la graphologie [A system for graphology].. Paris: Garnier Frees.Neter, E. Ben-Shakhar, G. (1989). The predictive validity of graphological inferences: A meta-analytic approach.. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 737– 745 1990-03056-001Nevo, B. (1988). Yes, graphology can predict occupational success: Rejoinder to Ben-Shakhar et al.. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 92– 94 1989-06878-001Nevo, B. (1989). Validation of graphology through use of a matching method based on ranking.. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 1331– 1336 1990-16078-001Oosthuizen, S. (1990). Graphology as predictor of academic achievement.. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 715– 721 1991-17158-001Pulver, M. (1931). Symbolik der Handschrift [Symbolism and handwriting].. Zurich: Orell Fussli.Rosenthal, D.A. Lines, R. (1978). Handwriting as a correlate of extroversion.. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 45– 48 1979-06039-001Scheerer, M. Lyons, J. (1957). Line drawings and matching responses to words.. Journal of Personality, 25, 251– 273 1958-02552-001Sharma, J.M. Vardhan, H. (1975). Graphology—what handwriting can tell you about an applicant?. Personnel, 52, 57– 63Singer, E. (1969). A manual of graphology. . Surrey: Duckworth, Unwin Brothers Ltd.Taylor, M.S. Sackheim, K.K. (1988). Graphology.. Personnel Administrator, 33, 71– 76 1989-20752-001Tett, R.P. Palmer, C.A. (1997). The validity of handwriting elements in relation to self-report personality trait measures.. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 11– 18 1997-07492-002Vine, I. (1974). Stereotypes in the judgment of personality from handwriting.. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 61– 64 1978-03475-001Watson, P.R. (1993, May). Benefits of graphology.. Professional Manager, 4Webb, S. (1986). Handwriting can be a guide to recruitment.. Employment Bulletin and Industrial Relations Digest, 2, 15– 16
