Restricting Access to Methods of Suicide
Rationale and Evaluation of this Approach to Suicide Prevention
Abstract
Abstract. Restriction of access to means for suicidal behavior, especially dangerous methods, is a key element in most national suicide prevention strategies. In this paper the rationale for this is discussed, including the fact that suicidal impulses are often brief, that availability of a method may influence both the occurrence and outcome of a suicidal act, and that if a favored means becomes less available it does not always result in substitution by another method. Examples of evidence for the effectiveness of restricting availability of suicidal methods on subsequent suicidal behavior are presented, plus the supporting findings from studies of long-term survivors of serious suicide attempts in which only a minority have gone on to die in subsequent suicide attempts. Finally, factors likely to determine the effectiveness of modifying access to means for suicide are considered, together with the main elements that need to be addressed in evaluation.
References
(2001). Changes in rates of suicide by car exhaust asphyxiation in England and Wales. Psychological Medicine, 31, 935–939
(1974). Development of suicidal Intent scales. In A.T. Beck, H.L.P. Resnik, & D.J. Lettieri (Eds.), The prediction of suicide (pp. 45-56). Philadelphia, PA: Charles Press
(1996). Changing patterns of self-poisoning in a UK health district. Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 89, 893–901
(1991). The presence and accessibility of firearms in the homes of adolescent suicides. A case-control study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 2989–2995
(1994). Survivors of self-inflicted firearm injury. A liaison psychiatry perspective. Medical Journal of Australia, 160, 421–425
(2002). National suicide prevention strategy for England. London: Department of Health
(2005). Epidemiology of intentional self-poisoning in rural Sri Lanka. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 583–584
(1997). Use of paracetamol for suicide and nonfatal poisoning in the UK and France: Are restrictions on availability justified?. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 51, 175–179
(2002). UK legislation on pack sizes of analgesics: Background, rationale, and effects on suicide and deliberate self-harm. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 32, 223–229
(1987). Attempted suicide: A practical guide to its nature and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press
(1997). Trends in deliberate self-harm in Oxford, 1985-1995. Implications for clinical services and the prevention of suicide. British Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 556–560
(2004). UK legislation on analgesic packs: Before and after study of long-term effects on poisonings. British Medical Journal, 329, 1076–1079
(2001). Effects of legislation restricting pack sizes of paracetamol and salicylates on self-poisoning in the UK: Before and after study. British Medical Journal, 322, 1203–1207
(2000). The international handbook of suicide and attempted suicide. Chichester: Wiley
(1995). Why patients choose paracetamol for self-poisoning and their knowledge of its dangers. British Medical Journal, 310, 164–164
(1992). Suicide in the home in relation to gun ownership. New England Journal of Medicine, 327, 467–472
(1998). Catalytic converters and prevention of suicides. Lancet, 352, 1525–
(1976). The coal gas story: UK suicide rates 1960-1971. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 30, 86–93
(2006). Association between the accessibility to lethal methods and method-specific suicide. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 67, 1074–1079
(1994). A follow-up study of attempted railway suicides. Social Science and Medicine, 38, 437–442
(1999). Acute liver failure. Medicine, 27, 80–82
(1985). Self-inflicted gunshot wounds: Lethality of method versus intent. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 228–231
(1978). Where are they now? A follow-up study of suicide attempters from the Golden Gate Bridge. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 8, 203–216
(1996). Prevention of suicide. Guidelines for the formulation and implementation of national strategies. New York: Author
(2001). National strategy for suicide prevention: Goals and objectives for action. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services
