Abstract
It has been suggested that emotion regulation improves with aging. Here, we investigated age differences in emotion regulation by studying modulation of the late positive potential (LPP) by emotion regulation instructions. The electroencephalogram of younger (18–26 years) and older (60–77 years) adults was recorded while they viewed neutral, unpleasant, and pleasant pictures and while they were instructed to increase or decrease the feelings that the emotional pictures elicited. The LPP was enhanced when participants were instructed to increase their emotions. No age differences were observed in this emotion regulation effect, suggesting that emotion regulation abilities are unaffected by aging. This contradicts studies that measured emotion regulation by self-report, yet accords with studies that measured emotion regulation by means of facial expressions or psychophysiological responses. More research is needed to resolve the apparent discrepancy between subjective self-report and objective psychophysiological measures.
References
2003). Guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode positioning nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 23, 107–110.
(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
(1987). Standaardvragen 1987 – Voorstellen voor uniformering van vraagstellingen naar achtergrondkenmerken en interviews [
(Standard questions 1987 – Proposals for unification of inquiries after background characteristics and interviews ] (2nd ed.). Leiden: Leiden University Press.2003). Nederlandse versie van de Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly-Revised [
(Dutch version of the Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly-Revised ]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger BV.2005). Application of repeated measures ANOVA to high-density ERP datasets: A review and tutorial. In , Event-related potentials: A methods handbook (pp. 57–82). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
(2009). See no evil: Directing visual attention within unpleasant images modulates the electrocortical response. Psychophysiology, 46, 28–33.
(1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
(2008). Deconstructing reappraisal: Descriptions preceding arousing pictures modulate the subsequent neural response. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 977–988.
(in press). Cognitive regulation of emotion in yogic meditation practitioners: Reappraisal modulates electrical brain potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology.
(1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468–484.
(1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.
(2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291.
(1997). Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 12, 590–599.
(2009). Motivated and controlled attention to emotion: Time-course of the late positive potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 505–510.
(2006). Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 6, 291–297.
(1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887–900.
(2004). Healthy and unhealthy emotion regulation: Personality processes, individual differences, and lifespan development. Journal of Personality, 72, 1301–1333.
(2009). Age-related changes in neural mechanisms supporting emotion processing and emotional memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 192–215.
(2007). Looking at the sunny side of life: Age-related change in an event-related potential measure of the negativity bias. Psychological Science, 18, 838–843.
(2002). Age-related changes in task-switching components: The role of task uncertainty. Brain and Cognition, 49, 363–381.
(2008). Modulations of the electrophysiological response to pleasant stimuli by cognitive reappraisal. Emotion, 8, 132–137.
(2005). Behavioral inhibition and amplification during emotional arousal: A comparison of two age groups. Psychology and Aging, 20, 144–158.
(2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Digitized photographs, instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical report A-6. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
(2008). Age differences in the emotional modulation of ERP old/new effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 70, 105–114.
(2009). Aging and emotional memory: The co-occurrence of neurophysiological and behavioral positivity effects. Emotion, 9, 369–377.
(1992). Dimension of affective experience in three age groups. Psychology and Aging, 7, 171–184.
(2009). Tell me about it: Neural activity elicited by emotional pictures and preceding descriptions. Emotion, 9, 531–543.
(2006). Emotion experience and expression across the adult lifespan: Insights from a multimodal assessment study. Psychology and Aging, 21, 303–317.
(2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 496–502.
(2005). Goal-directed memory: The role of cognitive control in older adults’ emotional memory. Psychology and Aging, 20, 554–570.
(2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.
(2006). Intentional modulation of emotional responding to unpleasant pictures: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 43, 292–296.
(2009). Electrophysiological correlates of decreasing and increasing emotional responses to unpleasant pictures. Psychophysiology, 46, 17–27.
(2002). Rethinking feelings: An fMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1215–1229.
(2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 242–249.
(1999). Handleiding bij de Nederlandse vertaling van de Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [
(Manual accompanying the Dutch translation of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) ]. Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht, Vakgroep Psychiatrie en Neuropsychologie.2008). Effective regulation of the experience and expression of negative affect in old age. Journal of Gerontology. Psychological Sciences, 63B, P138–P145.
(2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37, 127–152.
(2009). Effects of regulating emotions on cognitive performance: What is costly for young adults is not so costly for older adults. Psychology and Aging, 24, 217–223.
(2004). Brain processes in emotional perception: Motivated attention. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 593–611.
(2006). Emotion and attention: Event-related brain potential studies. In , Progress in brain research: Understanding emotions (Vol. 156, pp. 31–51). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
(2004). The facilitated processing of threatening faces: An ERP analysis. Emotion, 4, 189–200.
(2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Erlbaum.
(2009). Individual differences in some (but not all) medial prefrontal regions reflect cognitive demand while regulating unpleasant emotion. Neuroimage, 47, 852–863.
(2006). Amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex are inversely coupled during regulation of negative affect and predicts the diurnal pattern of cortisol secretion among older adults. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 4415–4425.
(2007). Gaze fixations predict brain activation during the voluntary regulation of picture-induced negative affect. Neuroimage, 36, 1041–1055.
(1992). Classificatie van links- en rechtshandige proefpersonen [
(Classification of left-handed and right-handed test subjects ]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 47, 88–92.1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
(2006). The negativity bias is eliminated in older adults: Age-related reduction in event-related brain potentials associated with evaluative categorization. Psychology and Aging, 21, 815–820.
(