Skip to main content
Article

Assessing Cognitive Capacity by P3 During a Complex Manual Control Task

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000260

Abstract. Our aim was to adapt a classical P3 method to assess the free cognitive capacity during spacecraft docking training in space. Electroencephalogram (EEG) measurement in space is limited by several conditions. Based on experience with our own EEG experiments on MIR and ISS, we decided to use dry electrodes and restricted the electrode placement to the forehead. We examined whether P3 can be reliably obtained under these conditions. Subjects had to perform a manually controlled docking task simultaneously with an acoustic monitory task. The P3 component was evoked by the acoustic stimuli of the secondary task. Twenty-six subjects participated in this study, situated in a space simulation on earth. After a familiarization session, they performed the docking tasks at three difficulty levels: low, medium, and difficult. In the secondary task, subjects had to discriminate between a low (750 Hz) and a high (1,000 Hz) tone, which differed in probability of 90% and 10%, respectively. The subjects had to count the high tone and after 10 relevant tones and had to give a voice command to a power supply configuration. P3 amplitude was largest and the latency shortest during the medium difficult task. A decision matrix based on differences between the relevant and irrelevant P3 was calculated for each subject and each task. The results suggest that P3 can be recorded during a complex manual control task and can be used to assess individual free cognitive capacity.

References

  • Alho, K., Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1989). Event-related brain potentials reflecting processing of relevant and irrelevant stimuli during selective listening. Psychophysiology, 26, 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb00704.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barry, R. J., Kirkaikul, S., & Hodder, D. (2000). EEG alpha activity and the ERP to target stimuli in an auditory oddball paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 39, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00114-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Donchin, E. (1987). The P300 as a metric for mental workload. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neuroscience, 39, 338–343. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Duezel, E., Zonelinas, A. P., Mangun, G. R., Heinze, H.-J., & Tulvig, E. (1997). Event-related brain potential correlated of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 5973–5978. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.11.5973 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellis, S. (2000). Collision in space. Ergonomics in Design, 8, 4–9. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eliseev, A. S., & Rauschenbach, B. V. (1977). Cosmonaut’s work during control of spacecrafts. In V. N. TschernigovskiEd., Problemy kosmicheskoi biologii (Vol. 34, pp. 39–49). Moscow, Russia: Nauka. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fowler, B., Bock, O., & Comfort, D. (2000). Is dual-task performance necessarily impaired in space? Human Factors, 42, 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872000779656507 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Israel, J. B., Wickens, C. D., Chjesney, G. L., & Donchin, E. (1980). The event-related brain potential as an index of display monitoring workload. Human Factors, 22, 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088002200210 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Janssen, W. H., & Gaillard, A. W. K. (1985). EEG and heart rate correlates of task load in car driving. In A. GundelEd., Proceedings of the Workshop “Electroencephalography in Transport Operations” (CEC) (pp. 39–53). Cologne, Germany: DFVLR-Institut für Flugmedizin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johannes, B., Bronnikov, S., Bubeev, Y., Arz, M., Piechowski, S., & Rittweger, J. (2019). Individual learning curves in manual control of six degrees of freedom. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 9, 18–24. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijap.20190902.01 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johannes, B., Bronnikov, S. V., Bubeev, Y. A., Dudukin, A. V., Hoermann, H. J., Frett, T., … Gaillard, A. W. K. (2017). A tool to facilitate learning in a complex manual control task. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 7, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijap.20170704.01 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johannes, B., Gaillard, A. W. K., Bronnikov, S., Bubeev, Y. A., Kotrovskaya, T. I., & Rittweger, R. (2017). P300 as indicator of mental load under 12 degree head down tilt [Abstract]. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 88(3), 217. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Johannes, B., Salnitski, V. P., Dudukin, A. V., Shevchenko, L. G., Shebuchev, A. E., & Bronnikov, S. V. (2016). Performance Assessment in the Experiment PILOT on-board Space Stations MIR and ISS. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 87, 534–544. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.4433.2016 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kiesel, A., Miller, J., Jolicoeur, P., & Brisson, B. (2007). Measurement of ERP latency differences: A comparison of single-participants and jackknife-based scoring methods. Psychophysiology, 45, 250–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00618.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kok, A. (1997). Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: A review and synthesis. Biological Psychology, 45, 19–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05221-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kramer, A. F., Sirevaag, E. J., & Braune, R. (1987). A psychophysiological assessment of operator workload during simulated flight missions. Human Factors, 29, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088702900203 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kramer, A. F., & Strayer, D. L. (1988). Assessing the development of automatic processing: An application of dual-task and event-related brain potential methodologies. Biological Psychology, 26, 231–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(88)90022-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mäntysalo, S., & Gaillard, A. W. K. (1986). Event-related potentials (ERPs) in a learning and memory test. Biological Psychology, 23, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(86)90086-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manzey, D. (2000). Monitoring of mental performance during spaceflight. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 71, A69–75. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Manzey, D., & Rummel, B. (1991). Psychopysiological measures of mental workload and multiple resource theory: Some arguments for dual-task experiments. In A. GundelEd., Proceedings of the CEC workshop on psychophyusiological measures in transport operations (pp. 139–167). Cologne, Germany: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Manzey, D., Lorenz, B., Schiewe, A., Finell, G., & Thiele, G. (1995). Dual-task performance in space: Results from a single-case study during a short-term space mission. Human Factors, 37, 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095778995599 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mecklinger, A., Kramer, A. F., & Strayer, D. L. (1992). Event related potentials and EEG components in a semantic memory search task. Psychophysiology, 29, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb02021.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mueller, E., Bilimoria, K., & Frost, C. (2008, August). Handling qualities evaluation for spacecraft docking in low earth orbit. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Näätänen, R. (1988). Implications of ERP data for psychological theories of attention. Biological Psychology, 26, 117–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(88)90017-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nieuwenhuis, S., De Geus, E. J., & Aston-Jones, G. (2011). The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology, 48, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01057.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oades, R. D., Zerbin, D., Dittmann-Balcar, A., & Eggers, C. (1996). Auditory event-related potential (ERP) and difference-wave topography in schizophrenic patients with/without active hallucinations and delusions: A comparison with young obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and healthy subjects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 22, 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(96)00026-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Otten, L. J., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Wientjes, C. J. E. (1995). The relation between event-related brain potential, heart rate, and blood pressure responses in an S1–S2 paradigm. Biological Psychology, 39, 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(94)00969-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petit, G., Cebolla, A. M., Fattinger, S., Petieau, M., Summerer, L., Cheron, G., & Huber, R. (2019). Local sleep-like events during wakefulness and their relationship to decreased alerteness in astronauts on ISS. Npj Microgravity, 5, 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-019-0069-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a andP3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Polich, J., & Comerchero, M. D. (2003). P3a from visual stimuli: Typicality, task, and topography. Brain Topography, 15, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022637732495 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenfeld, J. P., & Kim, M. (1991). Ongoing pain as a mental workload indexed by P300 depression. Psychophysiology, 28, 336–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb02203.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Salnitski, V. P. (2000). Otsenka i prognozirovanie nadezhnosti professionalnoi deyatelnosti kosmonavta [Evaluation and prognosis of reliability of cosmonauts’ professional work]. In V. I. MyasnikovS. I. StepanovaV. P. SalnitskiO. P. KozerenkoA. P. NechaevEds., Problema psihicheskoi astenisatsii v dlitelnom kosmicheskom polete [The problem of psychic asthenia during long-term space flight] (pp. 94–123). Moscow, Russia: Slovo. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Salnitski, V. P., Dudukin, A. V., & Johannes, B. (2001). Evaluation of operator’s reliability in long-term isolation (The PILOT-Test). In V. M. BaranovEd., Simulation of extended isolation: Advances and problems (pp. 30–50). Moscow, Russia: Slovo. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187–1188. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3700.1187 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. ParasuramanD. R. DaviesEds., Varieties of attention (pp. 63–102). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wickens, C. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50, 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288394 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar