Skip to main content
Original Articles

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Community Sample of Young Children in Flanders

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.189

This study investigates some psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), a brief measure for screening behavioral and emotional problems in children and adolescents. In two independent Flemish community samples of young children, parents (Sample 1: N = 532; Sample 2: N = 1086) and teachers (Sample 1: N = 512; Sample 2: N = 1049) of children aged 4-8 completed all items of the SDQ. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence for both a three- and a five-factor solution. Internal consistency and interrater reliability of the different SDQ scales were found to be satisfactory, except for the Conduct problems and the Peer problems scales. A good construct validity with the subscales of the well-established Child Behavior Checklist was found. A 2 (gender) × 2 (age groups: 4-5 and 6-7 years) ANOVA indicated that more hyperactivity/inattention problems and more internalizing behavior was reported for the oldest age group. More behavior problems were reported for boys than for girls, whereas girls were attributed more prosocial behavior.

References

  • Achenbach, T.M. (1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist 4-18 and 1991 profile . Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Achenbach, T.M. (1991b). Manual for the Teacher's Report Form and 1991 Profile . Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Achenbach, T.M. (1991c). Manual for the Youth Self-Report . Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Achenbach, T.M. McConaughy, S.H. Howell, C.T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213– 232 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandalos, D.L. Enders, C.K. (1996). The effects of nonnormality and number of response categories on reliability. Applied Measurement and Education, 9, 151– 160 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, A. Woerner, W. Hasselhorn, M. Banaschewski, T, Rothenberger, A. (2004). Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 11– 16 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • de Groot, A. Koot, H.M. Verhulst, F.C. (1994). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Child Behavior Checklist cross-informant syndromes. Psychological Assessment, 6, 220– 230 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dickey, W.C. Blumberg, S.J. (2004). Revisiting the factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: United States, 2001. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 1159– 1167 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581– 586 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, R. (1999). The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 791– 801 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337– 1345 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, R. Ford, T. Corbin, T. Meltzer, H. (2004). Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) multi-informant algorithm to screen looked-after children for psychiatric disorders. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 25– 31 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, R. Ford, T. Simmons, H. Gatward, R. Meltzer, H. (2000). Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 534– 539 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, R. Renfrew, D. Mullick, M. (2000). Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 129– 134 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodman, R. Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: Is small beautiful?. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 17– 24 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hartman, C.A. Hox, J. Auerbach, J. Erol, N. Fonseca, A.C. Mellenbergh, G.J. Novik, T.S. Osterlaan, J. Roussos, A.C. Shalev, R.S. Zilber, N. Sergeat, J.A. (1999). Syndrome dimensions of the Child Behavior Checklist and the Teacher Report Form: A critical empirical evaluation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 1095– 1116 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klasen, H. Woerner, W. Wolke, D. Meyer, R. Overmeyer, S. Kaschnitz, W. Rothenberger, A. Goodman, R. (2000). Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 271– 276 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koskelainen, M. Sourander, A. Kaljonen, A. (2000). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire among Finnish school-aged children and adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 277– 284 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Koskelainen, M. Sourander, A. Vauras, M. (2001). Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a community sample of Finnish adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 10, 181– 185 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kumpulainen, K. Räsänen, E. Henttonen, I. Almqvist, F. Kresanov, K. Linna, S.L. Moilanen, I. Piha, J. Puura, K. Tamminen, T. (1998). Bullying and psychiatric symptoms among elementary school-age children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 705– 717 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loeber, R. Farrington, D.P. (2000). Young children who commit crime: Epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 737– 762 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moffit, T.E. Caspi, A. Harrington, H. Milne, B.J. (2002). Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 179– 207 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muris, P. Meesters, C. van den Berg, F. (2003). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Further evidence for its reliability and validity in a community sample of Dutch children and adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 1– 8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nunnally, J.C. Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Offord, D.R. Boyle, M.H. Szatmari, P. Raegrant, N.I. Links, P.S. Cadman, D.T. Byles, J.A. Crawfor, J.W. Blum, H.M. Byrne, C. Thomas, H. Woodward, C.A. (1987). Ontario Child Health Study: II. Six month prevalence of disorder and rates of service utilization. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 832– 836 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Poznanski, E.O. (1994). Phenomenology and epidemiology of mood disorders in children and adolescents. In W.M. Reynolds & H.F. Johnston (Eds.), Handbook of depression in children and adolescents: Issues in clinical child psychology (pp. 19- 39). New York: Plenum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smedje, H. Broman, J.-E. Hetta, J. von Knorring, A.-L. (1999). Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 8, 63– 70 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Widenfelt, B.M. Goedhart, A.W. Treffers, P.D. Goodman, R. (2003). Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 281– 289 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Widaman, K.F. (1993). Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 263– 311 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woerner, W. Becker, A. Rothenberger, A. (2004). Normative data and scale properties of the German parent SDQ. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 3– 10 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zwick, W.R. Velicer, W.F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432– 442 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar