Psychometric Properties of the French Version of the Self-Report and Teacher Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Abstract
Abstract. This study was the first attempt at determining the psychometric properties of the French self-report and teacher Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) versions. An epidemiological sample of 1,400 youths (12.8 ± 0.69 years), second-year schoolchildren (boys n = 692, girls n = 708), and their teachers completed the SDQ. The analyses assessed (1) reliability using the internal consistency and test-retest methods; (2) validity by means of homogeneity measures, factor analyses, and criterion group methods; and (3) inter-rater agreement. Cut-off scores were also determined. Gender was considered for factor and cut-off analyses. Psychometric properties were satisfactory for the total difficulties scale both for the self-report and teacher SDQs (although somewhat less so for the self-report subscales). The five-factor structure theoretically expected was confirmed for both SDQs. Scores above the 90th percentile were associated with an increase in the number of at-risk youths from two groups (school failure or referred for psychological care). The current data demonstrated that the French SDQ versions could accurately measure psychopathological symptoms in youths and be considered as screening tools whose validity would appear to be promising.
References
Achenbach, T.M. (1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile . Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of PsychiatryAchenbach, T.M. (1991b). Manual for the Teacher's Report Form and 1991 Profile . Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of PsychiatryAchenbach, T.M. (2005). Advancing assessment of children and adolescents: Commentary on evidence-based assessment of child and adolescent disorders. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 541– 547(1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author
Anastasi, A. (1990). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: MacmillanBourdon, K.H. Goodman, R. Rae, D.S. Simpson, G. Koretz, D.S. (2005). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: US normative data and psychometric properties. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 557– 564Brier, N. (1995). Predicting antisocial behavior in youngsters displaying poor academic achievement: A review of risk factors. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 16, 271– 276Elander, J. Rutter, M. (1995). Use and development of the Rutter parents' and teachers' scale. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 6, 63– 78Fombonne, E. (1991). The use of questionnaires in child psychiatry research: Measuring their performance and choosing an optimal cut-off. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 677– 693Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581– 586Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337– 1345Goodman, R. Meltzer, H. Bailey, V. (1998). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 7, 125– 130Goodman, R. Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: Is small beautiful?. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 17– 24Klasen, H. Woerner, W. Wolke, D. Meyer, R. Overmeyer, S. Kaschnitz, W. (2000). Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 271– 276Koskelainen, M. Sourander, A. Kaljonen, A. (2000). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire among Finnish school-aged children and adolescents. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 277– 284Koskelainen, M. Sourander, A. Vauras, M. (2001). Self-reported strengths and difficulties in a community sample of Finnish adolescents. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 10, 180– 185Masi, G. Brovedani, P. Poli, P. (1998). School failure in early adolescence: The psychopathological risk. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 29, 127– 140Nunnally, J.O. (1978). Psychometric theory . New York: McGraw-HillPrior, M. Sanson, A. Smart, D. Oberklaid, F. (1999). Psychological disorders and their correlates in an Australian community sample of preadolescent children. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 563– 580Rothenberger, A. Woerner, W. (2004). Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Evaluations and applications. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13 suppl.2, 1– 54Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient α. Psychological assessment, 8, 350– 353(1999). Statistica for the Windows operating system . Tulsa, OK: StatSoft
(1994). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioral disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research . Geneva: WHO
