Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Articles

Ambulatory Assessment - Monitoring Behavior in Daily Life Settings

Published Online:November 05, 2007https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.206

Abstract

Abstract. Ambulatory assessment refers to the use of computer-assisted methodology for self-reports, behavior records, or physiological measurements, while the participant undergoes normal daily activities. Since the 1980s, portable microcomputer systems and physiological recorders/analyzers have been developed for this purpose. In contrast to their use in medicine, these new methods have hardly entered the domain of psychology. Questionnaire methods are still preferred, in spite of the known deficiencies of retrospective self-reports. Assessment strategies include: continuous monitoring, monitoring with time- and event-sampling methods, in-field psychological testing, field experimentation, interactive assessment, symptom monitoring, and self-management. These approaches are innovative and address ecological validity, context specificity, and are suitable for practical applications. The advantages of this methodology, as well as issues of acceptance, compliance, and reactivity are discussed. Many technical developments and research contributions have come from the German-speaking countries and the Netherlands. Nonetheless, the current Decade of Behavior (APA) calls for a more widespread use of such techniques and developments in assessment. This position paper seeks to make the case for this approach by demonstrating the advantages - and in some domains - necessities of ambulatory monitoring methodology for a behavioral science orientation in psychology.

References

  • American Psychological Association (1999). “Decade of Behavior” moves forward. APA MONITOR Online, 30(3), www.decadeofbehavior.org/index.cfm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Barrett, L.F. Barrett, D.J. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 175– 185 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buse, L. Pawlik, K. (1984). Inter-Setting-Korrelationen und Setting-Persönlichkeit-Wechselwirkungen: Ergebnisse einer Felduntersuchung zur Konsistenz von Verhalten und Erleben. [Between-setting correlations and setting-personality interactions: Results of a field-study of behavioural consistency.rsqb; Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 15, 44– 59 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buse, L. Pawlik, K. (1996). Ambulatory behavioral assessment and in-field psychological testing. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 29-50). Seattle, WA.: Hogrefe & Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bussmann, H. (1998). Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities in rehabilitation medicine . Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, G. (1991). Memory in the real world . East Sussex: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, G. Java, R. (1995). Memory for medical history. Accuracy of recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 273– 288 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526– 536 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ebner-Priemer, U.W. Ed. (2006). Ambulantes psychophysiologisches Monitoring - neue Perspektiven und Anwendungen . [Ambulatory assessment - New perspectives and applications]. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • European Network for Ambulatory Assessment (2006). Homepage at www.ambulatory-assessment.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. (2006). Assessment in daily life .. . 2000-2005 . Retrieved August 6, 2007, from www.ambulatory-assessment.org/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. Leonhart, R. Foerster, F. (2002). Alltagsnahe Psychologie mit hand-held PC und physiologischem Mess-System . [Psychology of daily life based on hand-held PC and physiological recording system]. Bern: Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. Myrtek, M. Eds. (1996). Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies . Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. Myrtek, M. Eds. (2001a). Progress in ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies . Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. Myrtek, M. (2001b). Ambulantes Monitoring und Assessment. [Ambulatory monitoring and assessment.]. In F. Rösler (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Serie Biologische Psychologie. Band 4: Grundlagen und Methoden der Psychophysiologie (pp. 657-798). Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fahrenberg, J. Myrtek, M. (2005). Psychophysiologie in Labor, Klinik und Alltag. 40 Jahre Projektarbeit der Freiburger Forschungsgruppe Psychophysiologie - Kommentare und Neue Perspektiven . [Psychophysiology in the laboratory, clinic, and field. 40 years of research - Commentaries and new perspectives]. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Foerster, F. Fahrenberg, J. (2000). Motion pattern and posture: Correctly assessed by calibrated accelerometers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32, 450– 457 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hansen, T.W. Jeppesen, J.R. Rasmussen, S. Ibsen, H. Torp-Pedersen, C. (2006). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and risk of cardiovascular disease: A population based study. American Journal of Hypertension, 19, 243– 50 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hektner, J.M. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The experience sampling method: Measuring the context and content of lives. In R.B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 233-243). New York: Wiley First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hektner, J.M. Schmidt, J.A. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method. Measuring the quality of everyday life . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Käppler, C. Brügner, G. Fahrenberg, J. (2001). Pocketcomputer-unterstütztes Assessment mit MONITOR: Befindlichkeit im Alltag, Methodenakzeptanz und die Replikation des Retrospektionseffektes. [Pocket-computer assisted assessment of subjective state, compliance, and replication of the negative retrospection effect] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 249– 266 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science . New York: Harper and Brothers First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Magnusson, D. (1980). Personality in an interactional paradigm of research. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1, 17– 34 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Michel, G. (in press). Daily patterns of symptom reporting in families with adolescent children. British Journal of Health Psychology, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mischel, W. (1969). Continuity and change in personality. American Psychologist, 24, 1012– 1018 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Myrtek, M. (2004). Heart and emotion. Ambulatory monitoring studies in everyday life . Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Myrtek, M. Brügner, G. Fichtler, A. König, K. Müller, W. Foerster (1988). Detection of emotionally induced ECG changes and their behavioral correlates: A new method for ambulatory monitoring. European Heart Journal, 9(Supplement N), 55– 60 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Myrtek, M. Foerster, F. Brügner, G. (2001). Freiburger Monitoring System (FMS). Ein Daten-Aufnahme- und Auswertungssystem für Untersuchungen im Alltag: Emotionale Beanspruchung, Körperlage, Bewegung, EKG, subjektives Befinden, Verhalten . [Freiburg Monitoring System (FMS). A data-acquisition system for research in daily life: Emotional strain, body position, activity, ECG, and subjective state]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Patry, J.-L. Eds. (1982). Feldforschung . [Field research]. Bern: Hans Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pawlik, K. (1988). “Naturalistische” Daten für Psychodiagnostik: Zur Methodik psychodiagnostischer Felderhebungen. [“Naturalistic” data for psychological assessment: The methodology of in-field assessments] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 9, 169– 181 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pawlik, K. Buse, L. (1982). Rechnergestützte Verhaltensregistrierung im Feld: Beschreibung und erste psychometrische Überprüfung einer neuen Erhebungsmethode. [Computer-assisted behaviour recording in the field: Description and first psychometric evaluation of a new method of study] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 3, 101– 118 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pawlik, K. Buse, L. (1992). Felduntersuchungen zur transsituativen Konsistenz individueller Unterschiede im Erleben und Verhalten. [In-field studies of transsituation consistency of individual differences in experience and behavior]. In K. Pawlik & K.H. Stapf (Eds.), Umwelt und Verhalten [Environment and behavior] (pp. 25-69). Bern: Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pawlik, K. Buse, L. (1996). Verhaltensbeobachtung in Labor und Feld. [Behavior observation in the laboratory and in the field]. In K. Pawlik (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung. Band 1. Grundlagen und Methoden der Differentiellen Psychologie [Encyclopedia of psychology: Differential psychology and personality research. Vol. 1: Foundations and methods of differential psychology] (pp. 359-394). Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pawlik, K. Buse, L. (2002). AMBU. Ambulatory monitoring and behavior-test unit . Göttingen: Hogrefe First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perrez, M. (2006). Plädoyer für eine theorieadäquatere Methodik in gewissen Domänen der Psychologie. [Arguments against the mismatch of theoretical assumptions and measures in certain domains of psychology] Verhaltenstherapie & Psychosoziale Praxis, 38, 319– 330 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perrez, M. Reicherts, M. (1989). Belastungsverarbeitung: Computerunterstützte Selbstbeobachtung im Feld. [Coping with stress: Computer-aided self-observation under natural conditions] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 10, 129– 139 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perrez, M. Reicherts, M. (1996). A computer-assisted self-monitoring procedure for assessing stress-related behavior under real life conditions. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment. Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 51-71). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perrez, M. Schoebi, D. Wilhelm, P. (2000). How to assess social regulation of stress and emotions in daily family life? A computer-assisted family self-monitoring system (FASEM-C). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 7, 326– 339 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Perrez, M. Wilhelm, P. (2000). Control psychology under the control of questionnaires. The search for an alternative assessment procedure. In W.J. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behaviour, mental processes, and consciousness (pp. 245-261). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pohl, R.F. Ed. (2004). Cognitive illusions. A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgment, and memory . New York: Psychology Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, R.E. Leffingwell, T.R. Ptacek, J.T. (1999). Can people remember how they coped? Factors associated with discordance between same-day and retrospective reports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 1050– 1061 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stone, A. Shiffman, S. Atienza, A. Nebeling, L. (2007). The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research . New York: Oxford University Press First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thiele, C. Laireiter, A.-R. Baumann, U. (2002). Diaries in clinical psychology and psychotherapy: A selective review. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 1– 37 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Todd, M. Tennnen, H. Carney, M.A. Armeli, S. (2004). Do we know how we cope? Relating daily coping reports to global and time-limited retrospective assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 310– 319 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tourangeau, R. Rasinski, K.A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299– 314 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilhelm, P. (2004). Empathie im Alltag von Paaren. Akkuratheit und Projektion bei der Einschätzung des Befindens des Partners . [Empathy in daily life of couples. Accuracy and projection when judging the emotional state of the partner]. Bern: Huber First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilhelm, P. Perrez, M. (2001). Felddiagnostik. [Diagnostic under field conditions.]. In R.-D. Stieglitz, U. Baumann, & H.J. Freyberger, Psychodiagnostik in Klinischer Psychologie, Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie (pp. 169-182). Stuttgart: Thieme First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilhelm, P. Perrez, M. (2004). How is my partner feeling in different daily-life settings? Accuracy of spouses' judgments about their partner's feelings at work and at home. Social Indicators Research, 67, 183– 246 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar