Skip to main content
Original Articles

An IRT Analysis of the Personal Optimism Scale

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.49

Abstract. In this study the psychometric properties of the Personal Optimism scale of the POSO-E questionnaire (Schweizer & Koch, 2001) for the assessment of dispositional optimism are evaluated by applying Samejima's (1969) graded response model, a parametric item response theory (IRT) model for polytomous data. Model fit is extensively evaluated via fit checks on the lower-order margins of the contingency table of observed and expected responses and visual checks of fit plots comparing observed and expected category response functions. The model proves appropriate for the data; a small amount of misfit is interpreted in terms of previous research using other measures for optimism. Item parameters and information functions show that optimism can be measured accurately, especially at moderately low to middle levels of the latent trait scale, and particularly by the negatively worded items.

References

  • Caprara, G.V. , Steca, P. , Zelli, A. , Capanna, C. (2005). A new scale for measuring adults' prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 77– 89 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Chernyshenko, O.S. , Stark, S. , Chan, K. , Drasgow, F. , Williams, B. (2001). Fitting item response theory models to two personality inventories: Issues and insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 523– 562 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chernyshenko, O.S. , Stark, S. , Drasgow, F. , Roberts, B.W. (2007). Constructing personality scales under the assumption of an ideal point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment, 19, 88– 106 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DiStefano, C. , Motl, R.W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 440– 464 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Drasgow, F. , Levine, M.V. , Tsien, S. , Williams, B. , Mead, A.D. (1995). Fitting polychotomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 143– 165 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Flora, D.B. , Curran, P.J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor models with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466– 491 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Herzberg, P.Y. , Glaesmer, H. , Hoyer, J. (2006). Separating optimism and pessimism: A robust psychometric analysis of the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Psychological Assessment, 18, 433– 438 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holland, P.W. , Hoskens, M. (2003). Classical test theory as a first-order item response theory: Application to true-score prediction from a possibly nonparallel test. Psychometrika, 68, 123– 149 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K.G. , Moustaki, I. (2001). Factor analysis of ordinal variables: A comparison of three approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 347– 387 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2005). Further empirical results on parametric vs. nonparametric IRT modeling of Likert-type personality data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 261– 279 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maydeu-Olivares, A. , Joe, H. (2005). Limited- and full-information estimation and goodness-of-fit testing in 2n contingency tables: A unified framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 1009– 1020 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R. , Zonderman, A.B. , Costa, P.T. , Bond, M.H. , Paunonen, S.V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552– 565 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L.K. , Muthén, B.O. (1998, 2006). Mplus user's guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55, 44– 55 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Quilty, L.C. , Oakman, J.M. , Risko, E. (2006). Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 99– 117 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rauch, W. , Schweizer, K. , Moosbrugger, H. (2006, July). Methodological approaches to the problem of dimensionality of optimism questionnaires . EAM-SMABS Conference in Budapest, Hungary First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rauch, W.A. , Schweizer, K. , Moosbrugger, H. (2007). Method effects due to social desirability as a parsimonious explanation of the deviation from unidimensionality in LOT-R scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1597– 1607 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, J.S. , Donoghue, J.R. , Laughlin, J.E. (2000). A general item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 3– 32 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, J.S. , Laughlin, J.E. , Wedell, D.H. (1996). Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 211– 233 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson-Whelen, S. , Kim, C. , MacCallum, R.C. , Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K. (1997). Distinguishing optimism from pessimism in older adults: Is it more important to be optimistic or not to be pessimistic?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1345– 1353 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph No. 17, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Scheier, M.F. , Carver, C.S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219– 247 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scheier, M.F. , Carver, C.S. , Bridges, M.W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063– 1078 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schweizer, K. , Koch, W. (2001). The assessment of components of optimism by POSO-E. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 563– 574 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schweizer, K. , Schneider, R. , Beck-Seyffer, A. (2001). Personaler und sozialer Optimismus. [Personal and social optimism] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 13– 24 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Stark, S. (2001). MODFIT: A computer program for model-data fit . Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from http://work.psych.uiuc.edu/irt First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vautier, S. , Raufaste, E. , Cariou, M. (2003). Dimensionality of the revised Life Orientation Test and the status of filler items. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 390– 400 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vermunt, J.K. (1997). LEM: A general program for the analysis of categorical data . Tilburg: Department of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wainer, H. Ed. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wieland-Eckelmann, R. , Carver, C.S. (1990). Dispositionelle Bewältigungsstile, Optimismus und Bewältigung: Ein internationaler Vergleich. [Dispositional coping styles, optimism, and copying: An international comparison] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 11, 167– 184 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar