Skip to main content
Original Article

Item Bias Analysis of the Young Schema-Questionnaire for Psychopathology, Gender, and Educational Level

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000044

This study examines the construct validity of the Young Schema-Questionnaire at the item level in a Dutch population. Possible bias of items in relation to the presence or absence of psychopathology, gender, and educational level was analyzed, using a cross-validation design. None of the items of the YSQ exhibited differential item functioning (DIF) for gender, and only one item showed DIF for educational level. Furthermore, item bias analysis did not identify DIF for the presence or absence of psychopathology in as much as 195 of the 205 items comprising the YSQ. Ten items, however, spread over the questionnaire, were found to yield relatively inconsistent response patterns for patients and nonclinical participants.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ball, S. A. , Young, J. E. (1999). Early maladaptive schemas questionnaire-research. New Haven, CT: Yale University School of Medicine. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605–634. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brody, L. R. , Hall, J. A. (2000). Gender, emotion, and expression. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 338–349). New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giesen-Bloo, J. , Dyck, R. van , Spinhoven, P. , Tilburg, W. van , Dirksen, C. , Asselt, T. van , ... Arntz, A. (2006). Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Randomized trial of schema-focused therapy versus transference-focused therapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 649–658. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Groenvold, M. , Bjorner, J. B. , Carol Klee, M. , Kreiner, S. (1995). Test for item bias in a quality of life questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48, 805–816. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hildago-Montesinos, M. D. , Gómez-Benito, J. (2003). Test purification and the evaluation of differential item functioning with multinomial logistic regression. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 1–11. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kok, F. G. (1988). Vraagpartijdigheid: Methodologische verkenningen [Item bias: Methodological research]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kok, F. G. , Mellenbergh, G. J. , Flier, H. van der (1985). Detecting experimentally induced item bias using the iterative logit method. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22, 295–303. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mellenbergh, G. J. (1994). A unidimensional latent trait model for continuous item responses. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 223–236. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oort, F. J. (1998). Schending [Violation]. In W. P. van den Brink, G. J. Mellenbergh, (Eds.), Testleer en testconstructie (pp. 247–268). Amsterdam: Boom. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Osterlind, S. J. (1983). Test item bias. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, series no. 07–030. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Power, M. , & Dalgleish, T. (1997). Cognition and emotion. From order to disorder. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S. P. , Widaman, K. F. , Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552–566. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rijkeboer, M. M. , Bergh, H. van den (2006). Multiple group confirmatory factor of the Young Schema-Questionnaire in a Dutch clinical versus nonclinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30, 263–278. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rijkeboer, M. M. , Bergh, H. van den , Bout, J. van den (2005). Stability and discriminative power of the Young Schema-Questionnaire in a Dutch clinical versus nonclinical sample. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 36, 129–144. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt, N. B. , Joiner, T. E. , Young, J. E. , Telch, M. J. (1995). The Schema-Questionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 295–231. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shah, R. , & Waller, G. (2000). Parental style and vulnerability to depression: The role of core beliefs. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 188, 19–25. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Soloff, P. H. (1994). Personality disorders. In M. Hersen, S. M. Turner, (Eds.), Diagnostic interviewing (2nd ed., pp. 129–154). New York: Plenum. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stone, E. F. , Stone, D. L. , Gueutal, H. G. (1990). Influence of cognitive ability on responses to questionnaire measures: Measurement precision and missing response problems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 418–427. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Stopa, L. , Thorne, P. , Waters, A. , & Preston, J. (2001). Are the short and long forms of the Young Schema-Questionnaire comparable and how well does each version predict psychopathology scores? Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 15, 253–272. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Swaminathan, H. , Rogers, H. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361–370. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vijver, F. J. R. van de , Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89–99. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Waller, G. , Meyer, C. , & Ohanian, V. (2001). Psychometric properties of the long and short versions of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Core beliefs among bulimic and comparison women. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 137–147. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Young, J. E. (1994). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (rev. ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Young, J. E. , Brown, G. (1994). Young Schema-Questionnaire (2nd ed.). In J. E. Young, , Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (rev. ed., pp. 63–76). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Young, J. E. , Klosko, J. S. (1994). Reinventing your life. New York: Plume. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Young, J. E. , Klosko, J. S. , Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy. A practitioner’s guide. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar