Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000209

A brief pathological personality measure, the G-50, was designed to study substantive developments from clinical psychology in occupational settings. Responses to item-pools assessing DSM-5 domain traits were collected from 696 working adults in England, Ireland, Wales, and Scotland. Exploratory factor analyses supported a structure comprised of Antagonism, Compulsivity, Detachment, Negative Affect, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism. Gender differences were observed following invariance analyses while five-factor indicators projected into latent space defined by pathological indicators revealed each big five construct related to multiple pathological traits. Latent profile analyses revealed a maladaptive class that experienced worse outcomes on a range of job performance and health indicators. Support for a hierarchical structure was observed where domain traits are lower order indicators of internalizing and externalizing factors. Mixed evidence for a generalized psychopathology factor was observed. Because lower-level maladaptive traits are described in the organizational sciences as “Dark,” we describe this generalized psychopathology factor as “Black.”

References

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bornstein, R. F. (2003). Behaviorally referenced experimentation and symptom validation: A paradigm for 21st-century personality disorder research. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 1–18. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, S. L., Muthén, B., Kaprio, J., D’Onofrio, B. M., Viken, R., & Rose, R. J. (2013). Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: An example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 681–703. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Conrad, K. J., Wright, B. D., McKnight, P., McFall, M., Fontana, A., & Rosenbeck, R. (2004). Comparing traditional and Rasch analyses of the Mississippi PTSD Scale: Revealing limitations of reverse-scored items. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 15–30. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Fruyt, F., & Salgado, J. F. (2003). Applied personality psychology: Lessons learned from the IWO field. European Journal of Personality, 17(S1), S123–S131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). Maladaptive personality constructs, measures, and work behaviors. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 98–110. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A., Guenole, N., Levine, S. J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (in press). The NEO-PI-R: Factor structure and gender invariance from exploratory structural equation modeling analyses in a high-stakes setting. Assessment, 20, 14–23. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A., McManus, I. C., & Scott, D. (2003). Personality, empathy, and attitudes to animal welfare. Anthrozoös, 16, 135–146. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gore, W. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816–821. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guenole, N. (2014). Maladaptive personality at work: Exploring the darkness. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7, 85–97. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guenole, N., Cockerill, T., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Smillie, L. D. (2011). Evidence for the validity of dimensions in the presence of rater source factors. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63, 203–218. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2001). Assessing leadership. A view from the dark side. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 40–51. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judge, T. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). The bright and dark sides of personality: Implications for personnel selection in individual and team contexts. In J. Langan-Fox, C. Cooper, & R. Klimoski, (Eds.), Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms (pp. 332–355). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kolenikov, S., & Bollen, K. A. (2012). Testing negative error variances is a Heywood case a symptom of misspecification? Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 124–167. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, R. F. (1999). The structure of common mental disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 921–926. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. V. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2006). Mplus: User’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 557–579. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–568. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Oldham, J. M., Clark, L. A., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., Krueger, R. F., & Siever, L. J. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part II: Clinical application. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 23–40. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 214–12. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wille, B., De Fruyt, F., & De Clercq, B. (2014). Fifty shades of personality: Integrating Five-Factor Model Bright and Dark sides of personality at work. Industrial & Organizational Psychology, 7, 121–126. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woods, M. (2006). Careless responding to reverse-worded items: Implications for confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 28, 186–191. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wright, A. G., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., Pincus, A. L., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951–951. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar