Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Identifying Pedophilic Interest in Sex Offenders Against Children With the Indirect Choice Reaction Time Task

Published Online:November 30, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000293

Abstract

Abstract. Pedophilia – a disorder of sexual preference with primary sexual interest in prepubescent children – is forensically relevant yet difficult to detect using self-report methods. The present study evaluated the criterion validity of the Choice Reaction Time (CRT) task to differentiate between a sample of child sex offenders with a presumably high rate of pedophilic individuals and three control groups (other sex offenders, non-sex offenders, and community controls, all male; N = 233). The CRT task required locating a dot superimposed on images depicting men, women, girls, or boys and scrambled pictures as quickly as possible. We used two picture sets, the Not Real People (NRP) set and the Virtual People Set (VPS). We predicted sexually relevant pictures to elicit longer reaction times in interaction with the participant group. Both CRTs showed main effects of stimulus explicitness and preferred stimulus gender. The CRT-NRP also yielded an interaction effect of participant group and stimulus maturity while the CRT-VPS showed a tendency in this direction. The overall effect size was moderate. Results offer support for the usefulness of the CRT task in forensic assessment of child sex offenders.

References

  • Abel, G. G., Jordan, A., Rouleau, J. L., Emerick, R., Barboza-Whitehead, S. & Osborn, C. (2004). Use of visual reaction time to assess male adolescents who molest children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 255–265. doi: 10.1177/107906320401600306 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Babchishin, K. M., Nunes, K. L. & Hermann, C. A. (2013). The validity of Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures of sexual attraction to children: A meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 487–499. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0022-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Banse, R., Schmidt, A. F. & Clarbour, J. (2010). Indirect measures of sexual interest in child sex offenders: A multimethod approach. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 319–335. doi: 10.1177/0093854809357598 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blanchard, R., Klassen, P., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E. & Blak, T. (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 13, 118–126. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.13.1.118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Card, R. D. & Farrall, W. (1988). Detecting faked penile responses to erotic stimuli. Annals of Sex Research, 3, 381–396. doi: 10.1007/BF00850441 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Conaglen, H. (2004). Sexual content induced delay: A reexamination investigating relation to sexual desire. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 359–367. doi: 10.1023/B:ASEB.0000028889.63425.fb First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dombert, B., Mokros, A., Brückner, E., Schlegl, V., Antfolk, J., Bäckström, A., … Santtila, P. (2013). The Virtual People Set: Developing computer-generated stimuli for the assessment of pedophilic sexual interest. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 557–582. doi: 10.1177/1079063212469062 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frenzel, R. R. & Lang, R. A. (1989). Identifying sexual preferences in intrafamilial and extrafamilial child sexual abusers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2, 255–275. doi: 10.1177/107906328900200304 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Freund, K. & Blanchard, R. (1989). Phallometric diagnosis of pedophilia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 100–105. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.100 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fromberger, P., Jordan, K., Herder, J., Steinkrauss, H., Nemetschek, R., Stolpmann, G. & Müller, J. L. (2012). Initial orienting towards sexually relevant stimuli: Preliminary evidence from eye movement measures. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 919–928. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9816-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gardiner, J. C., Luo, Z. & Roman, L. A. (2009). Fixed effects, random effects and GEE: What are the differences? Statistics in Medicine, 28, 221–239. doi: 10.1002/sim.3478 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Geer, J. H. & Bellard, H. S. (1996). Sexual content induced delays in unprimed lexical decisions: Gender and context effects. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 379–395. doi: 10.1007/BF02437581 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Geer, J. H. & Melton, J. S. (1997). Sexual content-induced delay with double-entendre words. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 295–316. doi: 10.1023/A:1024574915201 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Giotakos, O. (2006). A combination of viewing reaction time and incidental learning task in child molesters, rapists, and control males and females. Annals of General Psychiatry, 5 (Suppl. 1), S114. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-5-S1-S114 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gress, C. (2005). Viewing time measures and sexual interest: Another piece of the puzzle. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 117–125. doi: 10.1080/13552600500063666 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gress, C. L., Anderson, J. O. & Laws, D. R. (2013). Delays in attentional processing when viewing sexual imagery: The development and comparison of two measures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 66–82. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02032.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hanson, R. K. & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haywood, T. W. & Grossman, L. S. (1994). Denial of deviant sexual arousal and psychopathology in child molesters. Behavior Therapy, 25, 327–340. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80291-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hietanen, J. K. & Nummenmaa, L. (2011). The naked truth: The face and body sensitive N170 response is enhanced for nude bodies. PLoS ONE, 6, e24408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024408 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Janssen, E., Everaerd, W., Spiering, M. & Janssen, J. (2000). Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal. The Journal of Sex Research, 37, 8–23. doi: 10.1080/00224490009552016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kalmus, E. & Beech, A. R. (2005). Forensic assessment of sexual interest: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 193–217. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2003.12.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Laws, D. R., Hanson, R. K., Osborn, C. A. & Greenbaum, P. E. (2000). Classification of child molesters by plethysmographic assessment of sexual arousal and a self-report measure of sexual preference. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1297–1312. doi: 10.1177/088626000015012004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Laws, D. R. & Holmen, M. L. (1978). Sexual response faking by pedophiles. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 5, 343–356. doi: 10.1177/009385487800500406 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Laws, D. R. & Rubin, H. B. (1962). Instructional control of an autonomic sexual response. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 93–99. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-93 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Looman, J. & Marshall, W. L. (2001). Phallometric assessments designed to detect arousal to children: The responses of rapists and child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 3–13. doi: 10.1177/107906320101300102 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mokros, A., Butz, M., Dombert, B., Santtila, P., Bäuml, K.-H. & Osterheider, M. (2011). Judgment of age and attractiveness in a paired comparison task: Testing a picture set developed for diagnosing paedophilia. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 323–334. doi: 10.1348/135532510X514104 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mokros, A., Dombert, B., Osterheider, M., Zappalà, A. & Santtila, P. (2010). Assessment of pedophilic sexual interest with an attentional choice reaction time task. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1081–1090. doi: 10.1007/s10508-009-9530-6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nichols, H. R. & Molinder, I. (1984). Multiphasic Sex Inventory. Tacoma, WA: Crime and Victim Psychology Specialists. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Osterheider, M., Banse, R., Briken, P., Goldbeck, L., Hoyer, J., Santtila, P., … Eisenbarth, H. (2012). Frequency, etiological models and consequences of child and adolescent sexual abuse: Aims and goals of the German multi-site MiKADO project. Sexual Offender Treatment, 7, 1–7. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pacific Psychological Assessment Corporation. (2004). The Not Real People (NRP) visual stimulus set. Victoria, BC: Pacific Psychological Assessment. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rice, M. E. & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Salemink, E., van den Hout, M. A. & Kindt, M. (2007). Selective attention and threat: Quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 607–615. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.04.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Santtila, P., Mokros, A., Viljanen, K., Koivisto, M., Sandnabba, N. K., Zappalà, A. & Osterheider, M. (2009). Assessment of sexual interest using a choice reaction time task and priming: A feasibility study. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 65–82. doi: 10.1348/135532507X267040 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. (2008). Pedophilia and sexual offending against children: Theory, assessment, and intervention. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. (2009). Pedophilia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 391–407. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153618 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seto, M. C., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E. & Barbaree, H. E. (2004). The Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests predicts recidivism among adult sex offenders with child victims. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 455–466. doi: 10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037426.55935.9c First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seto, M. C. & Lalumière, M. L. (2001). A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 15–25. doi: 10.1177/107906320101300103 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Singer, B. (1984). Conceptualizing sexual arousal and attraction. The Journal of Sex Research, 20, 230–240. doi: 10.1080/00224498409551222 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Snowden, R. J., Craig, R. L. & Gray, N. S. (2011). Indirect behavioral measures of cognition among sexual offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 192–217. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.557750 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stermac, L. E., Segal, Z. V. & Gillis, R. (1990). Social and cultural factors in sexual assault. In W. L. MarshallD. R. LawsH. E. BarbareeEds., Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 143–159). New York, NY: Plenum Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tanner, J. M. (1973). Growing up. Scientific American, 229, 34–43. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0973-34 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilson, R. J. (1998). Psychophysiological signs of faking in the phallometric test. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 113–126. doi: 10.1177/107906329801000204 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Worling, J. R. (2006). Assessing sexual arousal with adolescent males who have offended sexually: Self-report and unobtrusively measured viewing time. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 383–400. doi: 10.1177/107906320601800406 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wright, L. W. & Adams, H. E. (1994). Assessment of sexual preference using a choice reaction time task. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 221–231. doi: 10.1007/BF02229209 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wright, L. W. & Adams, H. E. (1999). The effect of stimuli that vary in erotic content on cognitive processes. The Journal of Sex Research, 36, 1–7. doi: 10.1080/00224499909551979 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zappalà, A., Antfolk, J., Bäckström, A., Dombert, B., Mokros, A. & Santtila, P. (2013a). Differentiating sexual preference in men: Using dual task rapid serial visual presentation task. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54, 320–327. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12050 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zappalà, A., Antfolk, J., Bäckström, A., Dombert, B., Mokros, A. & Santtila, P. (2013b). Using a dual-target Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Task (RSVP) as an attention-based measurement procedure of sexual preference: Is it possible to fake? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20, 73–90. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2011.619642 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zou, K. H., O’Malley, A. J. & Mauri, L. (2007). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circulation, 115, 654–657. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594929 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar